M1 vs. Munis

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
M1
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
M1, from ECI Software Solutions headquartered in Ft. Worth, is an all-in-one manufacturing ERP software solution, built for small and medium-sized discrete manufacturers.N/A
Munis
Score 5.8 out of 10
N/A
Tyler Technologies offers Munis, their ERP suite for public sector entities. The modules are Munis Financial Management, Munis Human Capital Management, Munis Procurement, Munis Revenue, Munis Tax Billing & Collection, and Munis Utility BIlling CIS. Additionally, the ERP may include and integrate modules from the Tyler suite of education products.N/A
Pricing
M1Munis
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
M1Munis
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
M1Munis
Considered Both Products
M1
Chose M1
We replaced Open Systems with M1 7 years ago. Our Open Systems software seemed to be more user-friendly and was not overburdened by reports and processes that were not needed for daily functions.
Chose M1
M1 is light years ahead in overall cost and proficiency. It allows so much more control and flexibility as compared to its competitors. When choosing M1 we went through many demos and M1 was the only ERP that met our needs and still does. We also control our own data which is a …
Chose M1
M1 is better with the manufacturing side of software whereas Sage 100 is better at the financial side. Which is frustrating that M1 implementation people are not accountants, so they got us up and running but did not do a good job of making sure the GL accounts were setup …
Chose M1
Our customization requirements were not that high and based on a price/cost benefit M1 was the winner. SAP was considered but the upfront costs and challenging learning curve together with the lack of flexibility in the SAP HANA public cloud version made the M1 choice more …
Chose M1
We considered several other option but M1 was presented as the most flexible and robust option that could handle our custom manufacturing.
Chose M1
We looked at a couple of other software programs, but none of them could compare to M1 and the ease of using the software.
Chose M1
M1 does a good job of being able to handle our requirements. Some of our assemblies and sub-assemblies require a significant amount of detail and different levels in order to complete - and M1 handles that. Some of the other products I've used, or implemented else where fall …
Chose M1
This has been very similar to SYSPRO bit the team at ECI has been far more helpful.
Munis

No answer on this topic

Features
M1Munis
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
M1
5.7
Ratings
23% below category average
Munis
8.8
Ratings
20% above category average
Pay calculation5.30 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration4.60 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files7.10 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
M1
7.0
Ratings
8% below category average
Munis
10.0
Ratings
27% above category average
API for custom integration7.60 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Plug-ins6.50 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
M1
8.1
Ratings
1% below category average
Munis
10.0
Ratings
20% above category average
Single sign-on capability9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions7.10 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
M1
6.5
Ratings
10% below category average
Munis
9.3
Ratings
25% above category average
Dashboards6.60 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Standard reports6.40 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Custom reports6.60 Ratings8.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
M1
6.9
Ratings
11% below category average
Munis
9.8
Ratings
24% above category average
Accounts payable6.90 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable6.90 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support5.30 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers8.10 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations6.50 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting6.80 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Standardized Processes7.80 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
M1
7.0
Ratings
12% below category average
Munis
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
M1
7.3
Ratings
7% below category average
Munis
10.0
Ratings
24% above category average
Pricing6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing7.40 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
M1
6.5
Ratings
14% below category average
Munis
9.5
Ratings
24% above category average
Billing Management8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management6.80 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management4.80 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting5.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Period Close7.70 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
M1
5.2
Ratings
28% below category average
Munis
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers5.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality4.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools4.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
M1
2.7
Ratings
94% below category average
Munis
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management2.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
M1
6.3
Ratings
9% below category average
Munis
10.0
Ratings
36% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated5.90 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Supplier Management6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
M1
4.9
Ratings
28% below category average
Munis
-
Ratings
Risk Repository6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management5.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments4.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection3.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification3.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
M1
4.0
Ratings
50% below category average
Munis
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization2.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management2.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management4.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management4.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management5.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
M1
6.6
Ratings
12% below category average
Munis
-
Ratings
Production Process Design6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Production Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs5.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
M1
5.6
Ratings
24% below category average
Munis
-
Ratings
Forecasting4.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Planning6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring5.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
M1
4.4
Ratings
47% below category average
Munis
-
Ratings
Proposal Management4.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
M1
-
Ratings
Munis
9.5
Ratings
22% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Project Costing00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Cost Capture00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Capital Project Management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
M1Munis
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
M1Munis
Likelihood to Recommend
7.3
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
M1Munis
Likelihood to Recommend
Implementation is by far the weakest link in the ECI/M1 process. Although the tool is powerful, the client is expected to drive the process of learning the tool, planning the meetings with consultants, identifying risks and making mitigation plans, etc. without any samples, guidance or assistance on the part of ECI. The tool is best suited to high volume, standard product manufacturers who build to inventory or to order without much variation. The shop floor routing and time tracking are straightforward if you can master the convoluted Unit Of Measure calculations. The tool is either hosted locally or accessed through Remote Desktop. Shop floor is web enabled but the main desktop for M1 is still a relay which makes connectivity a potential issue. Moving this platform to a truly web hosted environment would substantially improve connectivity and eliminate compatibility issues with Apple products
Read full review
Munis is great for any sort of data keeping and accounting work. There are features of Munis that I am still not familiar with even after 6 years of use. Munis would not be very good for a point of sale sort of operation like a retail store because it just simply is not set up for that sort of operation.
Read full review
Pros
  • Manage inventory counts. Good precision on quantities in and out, through shipping, MI, MR, and receipts.
  • Job costing shows great details on labor, operations, and materials to be used. I wished that would do better in outside operations that would return, but we still think it is great.
  • Ability to track changes (changelog), showing all changes that had in a particular place. Such as where, when, and by whom a line item unit price was changed in a PO.
  • Link, traceability, keeping history. If done correctly, it is amazing to keep the history of a part/lot.
  • The amount of user rights/customization is unbelievable. It can be hard to set up in the beginning, but it is great that you can give some very specific access to a user, and it is not (in general) as a package.
Read full review
  • Munis has multiple different sections that each pertain to different areas of our office. For example, there is a section in Munis that is for listing. This area supports all of the information that our county (or any other county) would need to enter to properly tax Business or Personal Property. There are similar sections for collections, vehicles, etc.
  • Munis has so many features. Munis can be set up to maintain foreclosures, garnishments, attachments, and/or executions within its collections sections.
  • Munis has so many features but they all work together which is great because you can see almost everything within the main bill inquiry area instead of having to flip back and forth between areas of the software.
  • Munis also has a finance side which is great because we are able to submit our collections reports to our finance department and they too can use finance to handle that side of the business.
  • Munis is highly customizable due to the amount of features it has.
Read full review
Cons
  • Some of the functions are pretty detailed - and so they take a while to generate screens and pages in reports.
  • We actually use it for 2 companies we own - and it would be nice if the inter company communication was a little smoother. It's hard to share some data, and not everything is possible to be shared.
  • Customized reports need to backed up before any updates to M1 or they're lost. It seems M1 overwrites the report folders everytime you run an update - so you have to keep track of what you've changed in Crystal Reports and restore it.
Read full review
  • Room for improvement for the Building Dept. software. Could not get it to work so we ended up getting rid of it and going back to our old system.
  • The payroll side could use more fine tuning. You have to manipulate some things to get them to work properly.
Read full review
Usability
Because it would be helpful if ECI would provide better documentation, communication and workflows to understand how each field interacts within the system and how each of those touch other areas within M1. It would also be useful if ECI would provide prescheduled training for how to customize things with M1 through Design Studio
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Support has been great and timely
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Our customization requirements were not that high and based on a price/cost benefit M1 was the winner. SAP was considered but the upfront costs and challenging learning curve together with the lack of flexibility in the SAP HANA public cloud version made the M1 choice more natural. SAP Services is usually more expensive compared to M1.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Time savings having to only enter certain information once and have it follow through the entire order process from quote to cash
Read full review
  • Streamlines some accounting processes (e.g. purchase orders)
  • Provides department heads with current up-to-date budget information
  • Web-based makes it easy to access from anywhere
Read full review
ScreenShots

M1 Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of