ManageEngine OpManager vs. ScienceLogic SL1

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ManageEngine OpManager
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
ManageEngine's OpManager is network performance monitoring software.
$245
for 10 devices
ScienceLogic SL1
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
ScienceLogic is a system and application monitoring and performance management platform. ScienceLogic collects and aggregates data across and IT ecosystems and contextualizes it for actionable insights with the SL1 product offering.N/A
Pricing
ManageEngine OpManagerScienceLogic SL1
Editions & Modules
Standard Edition
$245
for 10 devices
Professional Edition
$345
for 10 devices
Enterprise Edition
11,545
for 250 devices
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ManageEngine OpManagerScienceLogic SL1
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup Fee$245 per installationRequired
Additional DetailsScienceLogic SL1 offers four tiers: SL1 Advanced – Application Health, Automated Troubleshooting and Remediation Workflows SL1 Base – Infrastructure Monitoring, Topology & Event Correlation SL1 Premium – AI/ML-driven Analytics, Low-Code Automated Workflow Authoring SL1 Standard – Infrastructure Monitoring – with Agents, Business Services, Incident Automation, CMDB Synchronization, Behavioral Correlation To get pricing for each tier, please contact the vendor.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ManageEngine OpManagerScienceLogic SL1
Considered Both Products
ManageEngine OpManager
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
it is great. Not opensource. Ours was run by a 3rd party provider who had their own version of nmap. The setup and use is simple and get tons of output in reports and alerts. I would like to get more use of this product as I learn more about it
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
We have an existing relationship with Manage Engine.
Manage engine was a better product in comparison with the other products. It has as option to have addons like network configuration Manager, Firewall log analyzer, switch port mapper, Ip address manager and packet analyzer.
M…
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
Compared to the Solarwinds products ManageEngine OpManager is much easier to configure and use. It's also vastly cheaper!

Something like the Solarwinds suite of applications is incredibly complicated and difficult to configure. ManageEngine OpManager is very straightforward to …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
ManageEngine OpManager is very easy to manage and easy to scale, and the GUI is far better than all available products in the market. We can have a single dashboard of all offerings of ManageEngine OpManager and they can be distributed through role-based access for monitoring …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
ManageEngine OpManager is more user-friendly and easy to use. It is all on your screen to set up and organize. The service logs monitor could display over a month of performance history, and you can make reports for each of the services, which others cannot do. The 3D viewer, …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
ManageEngine OpManager is faster, not bloated, and less expensive. Wins in every category in my opinion.
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
We have been using ManageEngine Opmanager for quite a long time, I'm not aware if the company was using other products before I joined.
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
We found ManageEngine OpManager easier to plan, implement, and train our team.
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
ManageEngine stands out effectively when compared to ControlUp monitoring solutions, mainly due to distinct architectural differences. One key advantage is its versatile deployment options, including
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
1. inhouse deployment using ManageEngine OpManager is easy and possible, but site24x7 has cloud based monitoring 2. We use both tools but ManageEngine OpManager is user friendly 3. it has free version up to 10 devices to monitor 4. Always available and very less updates …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
OpManager teams' technical support was excellent. They helped us throughout the implementation - from the initial discovery phase. It is also very easy to use. Our Infrastructure team was able to use it with minimal training.
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
OpManager's straightforward license policy simplifies our product selection process significantly. This clarity enables us to make informed decisions aligned with our business needs, facilitating efficient budgeting and resource allocation. The transparent licensing structure …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
OpManager is the best solution between all the vendors we reviewed. When completing your request for proposal, be specific as possible with your expectations and needs. Ensure the vendor you select is the correct fit. OpManager selected all the check boxes for our …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
A hardware monitor is a software application used for hardware health monitoring. Hardware monitor software can collect a wide range of information related to hardware health, including CPU, temperature, and fan speed.
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
OpManager, compared to other platforms, is much cheaper, compared to performance and performance, it has the same characteristics as other tools and is quite fast compared to its market competitors. The sensors it has are useful at the level of network equipment, although it …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
more accurate with great GUI + it agentless
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
Reliable with almost no false positives at all
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
I think for the price this product offers much more. Maybe not as pretty but certainly is feature rich with the ability to add and manage multiple device brands (Cisco, Cisco Meraki, Fortinet, Palo) in an easy to use and very customizable interface. You can get as deep as you …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
Before implementing ME OpManager, I used the Nagios Core monitoring system. When choosing OpManager, we also considered other options. One option was to stay with Nagios. Other monitoring systems we considered were Zabbix and op5 Monitor. The advantage of Opmanager was based on …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
ManageEngine OpManager is the best, most suitable Network Device Monitoring solution I have used. It is straightforward to setup, configure, administrate and tailor. It also has a very good UI and a comprehensive device Template repository.
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
ManageEngine OpManager provides us with the same functionality, the web UI performs better and the price is much less. Support is quick to respond to any issues and the community also has a lot of great information and people willing to help and share their experiences and …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
Main reason to select ManageEngine was price/performance ratio. Another reason was great coverage of monitoring of different technologies and modules: network devices of various vendors, network modules like NCM, NFA, support for monitoring of vmware virtualisation , citrix …
Chose ManageEngine OpManager
During our competitive analysis, we found ManageEngine OpManager was not expensive compared to other vendors. At the same time, there was no compromise on the features such as customized reporting or configuring alerts per our clientele's unique requirements. These are our …
ScienceLogic SL1
Chose ScienceLogic SL1
ScienceLogic SL1 supports large scale of IT Infrastructure devices and vendors.
Was the single tool providing multiple functionalities at same time and allowed to remove additional legacy tools used for monitoring.
Allowed integration with incident management and CMDB. Allowed …
Chose ScienceLogic SL1
From a capability perspective they stack up very similar but from a look and feel, ScienceLogic SL1 one is miles behind the curve on all three. We chose SL because we already had elements of the service in place on our infrastructure from our previous MSP so they were a …
Chose ScienceLogic SL1
It is a User-friendly tool compared to other tools in the market.
Chose ScienceLogic SL1
I see great potential and infact i do strongly beleive it offers even beter capabilities than the traditional tools out there but again it comes down to how well you have trained us on how to unlock these capabilities. I suggest incentives for techs for providing feedback for …
Chose ScienceLogic SL1
Geneos is more complicated and 'heavy' to setup. It requires a lot of expertise in setting up. Also the dashboards are not great. ScienceLogic SL1 works well for customer facing dashboards.
Chose ScienceLogic SL1
For url monitoring, db status monitoring
Chose ScienceLogic SL1
Entuity was lacking a lot of custom reporting and also the out of the box automation and RBA was also less. Our customers were mainly looking for devices which are next gen like sdwan which Entuity doesn't support. When it come to ScienceLogic SL1 it will support all sets of …
Chose ScienceLogic SL1
Galileo analyzes storage arrays and backups more thoroughly, but SL1 is much better for host and network monitoring. SL1 has some storage monitoring features for some storage arrays, but they are not as detailed.
Chose ScienceLogic SL1
IBM Tivoli NetCool/OMNIbus
Chose ScienceLogic SL1
In comparison to above tools specifically in terms of monitoring capabilities, ScienceLogic SL1 is way-way behind.

A lot of features which were available in these suites may be in 2010s are still not available in 2020s.
Chose ScienceLogic SL1
I was not part of the team selecting ScienceLogic SL1. Our goal was to increase event visibility in our server environment. We were using scripting which created many false events. SolarWinds is primarily used in the Network space to monitor network gear.
Chose ScienceLogic SL1
Agentless product that can integrate easily with other product and also allow us to automate tasks, example closing tickets when events are cleared automatically which user interactions.
Chose ScienceLogic SL1
Just because Science logic provides much more better enhancement and getting improved everyday. The autonomous integration and overall customization provided by the SL1 Platform is outstanding. In every sections be it in Monitoring or checking system logs and provide the best …
Chose ScienceLogic SL1
Nimsoft is a very powerful tool that has been around for years.. ScienceLogic SL1 is able to be tweaked and customised due to python scripting
Chose ScienceLogic SL1
As described already 3 times, it has more customization over itm6 and is cheaper than dynatrace.
Chose ScienceLogic SL1
Science logic SL1 is so user friendly and it's really easy to navigate between function. I would recommend Sciene logic SL1 to all of them who are looking for really useful monitoring tool and expecting easy way of managing it.
Chose ScienceLogic SL1
ScienceLogic SL1 has a greater understanding and maturity on what Infrastructure monitoring needs to be and has to include at a decent price point for what it offers compared to its competitors.
Chose ScienceLogic SL1
ScienceLogic SL1 comparing with ITM/Netcool monitoring has better price. It's more easy to implement and mange ScienceLogic SL1 then other monitoring tools.
Chose ScienceLogic SL1
SL1 is able to offer way more enhanced monitoring than UIM. We have used UIM for quite a long time and the benefits offered by SL1 are much higher.
Chose ScienceLogic SL1
Used nagios but I found this is the best
Features
ManageEngine OpManagerScienceLogic SL1
Network Performance Monitoring
Comparison of Network Performance Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
ManageEngine OpManager
8.8
Ratings
7% above category average
ScienceLogic SL1
-
Ratings
Automated network device discovery8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Network monitoring9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Baseline threshold calculation8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Network capacity planning8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Packet capture analysis8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Network mapping8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable reports8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Wireless infrastructure monitoring8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Hardware health monitoring9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
AIOps Features
Comparison of AIOps Features features of Product A and Product B
ManageEngine OpManager
-
Ratings
ScienceLogic SL1
6.5
Ratings
0% above category average
Monitoring and Alerting00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Performance Analytics00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Incident Management00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Service Desk Integration00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Root Cause Analysis00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Capacity Planning Tool00 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Configuration and Change Management00 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Automated Remediation00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Collaboration and Communication00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Threat Intelligence00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ManageEngine OpManagerScienceLogic SL1
Small Businesses
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA)
Score 9.0 out of 10
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ManageEngine OpManagerScienceLogic SL1
Likelihood to Recommend
7.4
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.1
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.1
(0 ratings)
6.5
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ManageEngine OpManagerScienceLogic SL1
Likelihood to Recommend
OpManager offers a set of advantages that allow it to adapt to the needs of the company, guaranteeing effective monitoring of the application networks used in our organization. It has an intuitive and easy-to-use interface. The initial setup went smoothly and in a decent amount of time.
Read full review
Appropriate if you are setting up a monitoring suite in new Infrastructure Environment. Definitely NOT suited for Migration Projects. ScienceLogic SL1 cannot cater to a lot of monitoring requirements which already would have been configured in old monitoring suite. Plus, limited support for customizations and having to go to "Feature Requests" route makes in extremely complicated.
Read full review
Pros
  • We changed our RDP port to a non-standard port and monitor servers by that instead of a simple ping. Systems that are busted will still respond to pings.
  • The dashboard shows us any drives that are almost full. We check this when we do our monthly maintenance.
  • Monitoring Windows services and event log events and sending notifications when things don't behave as expected.
Read full review
  • Best overall coverage of montioring different technologies.
  • Easy to use in any environment
  • Customizable being able to generate your own reports, dashboards, DA's, RBA's, etc.
  • Have very good out of the box integrations with other monitoring solutions such as ServiceNow
  • Always improving and regularly releasing new versions and upgrades to the system/DA's.
  • Interactive community
Read full review
Cons
  • Adding devices to existing groups and applying a group-wide parameter.
  • Email alerts can be a bit challenging depending on how email is managed within a company, sometimes adding ManageEngine OpManager to the allowed relay list for Exchange is necessary to receive any alerts
Read full review
  • Creating powerpacks from scratch for new devices may be straightforward but will rarely be easy. Rewarding when completed, but not easy.
  • Developer documentation needs a rethink. While the information may be there (it isn't always) it is not easy to find. This is not helped by using different terms for the same things.
  • A developer console/dashboard for monitoring data collection from powerpacks instances without having to switch webpages or have to monitor multiple webpages.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
This product works very well for our organization, and it would be hard to not have a tool like this going forward
Read full review
We migrated away from our 20-year-old homegrown solution and have no back-tracking capability. ScienceLogic is demonstrating new capabilities that we would not have been able to do on our own using our legacy system.
We understand the capabilities of competitors based on our bake-off selection where ScienceLogic won on capabilities and future near-term potential (expandability, platform growth). We know that those competitors are not really close to where we have been able to push ScienceLogic (as a partner).
Read full review
Usability
The rating I provided is based on the product quality, experience (I have been using OpManager for almost the last 4 years), and relevance of the information/response I generated through Manage Engine OpManager. I have also received good support from OpManager.
Read full review
We use ScienceLogic SL1 in our organization to serve effective monitoring solutions to our external customers. Our customers depend upon us for critical events/alerts related to their IT infrastructure gears and using SL1, we're able to provide them with a proactive monitoring solution that resolves an issue before an impact is noticed by the customer. There are very few monitoring solutions that can cater to a variety of Cloud platforms like Public Cloud (AWS, Azure) and private cloud simultaneously and SL1 addresses this business problem very well
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Science Logic SL1 provides the option of Distributed deployment where multiple instances of each appliance can be deployed to manage the load and availability. SL1 provides a High Availability feature for Database Servers and Data Collection. If one of the Data Collectors in the collector group fails, it will automatically redistribute the devices from the failed Data Collector among the other Data Collectors in the Collector Group. The high availability feature for the Database server ensures that SL1 performs failover automatically to another server without causing the outage to the application.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
The performance is entirely dependent on the complexity of the environment/network being used to host the platform. Outside of those factors, the platform runs very efficiently and quickly out of the box. We have integrations with other platforms and neither seem to take a hit from our moderate API usage. Any issues with performance would be experienced by choices made in infrastructure or complexity of things built by the customer to display in the GUI (overly complicated and cluttered dashboards for example)
Read full review
Support Rating
At first, we were not able to add our Avaya switches to the configuration backup module, our partner tried to help, but they did not find the solution, we had one remote session with tech support of ME and they solve the problem.
Read full review
So far, it's good as part of my overall experience, except for a couple of use cases. The support team is well knowledgeable, has technical sound, and is efficient. When support escalates to engineering, the issue gets stuck and takes months to resolve.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
When I joined our company, I did not know about the in person training at firts. Logging onto the SL University, I realised that there were different sessions being held at different times throughout the year. The training itself was good, but being in a different time zone, made it difficult to attend, but the sessions that I attended was great!
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
There are a lot of educational materials and courses on the SL1 training site (Litmos university). However the recording quality is sometimes not very good - screen resolution is low. There is a lack of professional rather than user-oriented documents and there are mistakes in documentation and education is not well structured.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Along with the purchase of the solution, we purchased a statement of work with their Professional Services organization to meet our outcomes and fill our critical gaps. The PS team was outstanding, very professional and allowed us to screen share while they built our integrations. In many cases they would teach us how they did certain things within the platform.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We have an existing relationship with Manage Engine. Manage engine was a better product in comparison with the other products. It has as option to have addons like network configuration Manager, Firewall log analyzer, switch port mapper, Ip address manager and packet analyzer. Manage engine has an excellent customer support who are always available and response is quick
Read full review
We evaluated a couple of other competitive products in the IT infrastructure observability domain; however, we found that ScienceLogic has a slight edge over the others for us. We encountered a cost barrier, as managing too many customers with an MSP setup was a costly affair, and several solutions did not offer an MSP solution at that time.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
Our deployment model is vastly different from product expectations. Our global / internal monitoring foot print is 8 production stacks in dual data centers with 50% collection capacity allocated to each data center with minimal numbers of collection groups. General Collection is our default collection group. Special Collection is for monitoring our ASA and other hardware that cannot be polled by a large number of IP addresses, so this collection group is usually 2 collectors). Because most of our stacks are in different physical data centers, we cannot use the provided HA solution. We have to use the DR solution (DRBD + CNAMEs). We routinely test power in our data centers (yearly). Because we have to use DR, we have a hand-touch to flip nodes and change the DNS CNAME half of the times when there is an outage (by design). When the outage is planned, we do this ahead of the outage so that we don't care that the Secondary has dropped away from the Primary. Hopefully, we'll be able to find a way to meet our constraints and improve our resiliency and reduce our hand-touch in future releases. For now, this works for us and our complexity. (I hear that the HA option is sweet. I just can't consume that.)
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • ROI has very much increased as we are able to fix issues in a faster manner.
  • Monitoring for system administrators has become easy using ManageEngine OpManager getting a centralized view.
  • Alerts are helping during odd hours where manual intervention is not possible.
Read full review
  • Identified Major Incidents at least 50% of times when it happens
  • Prevented Major Incidents due to alerting for basic IT Infra level issues at least more than 60% scenarios
  • Provides ability to monitor large variety of IT Infra level devices and services
Read full review
ScreenShots

ManageEngine OpManager Screenshots

Screenshot of OpManager's DashboardScreenshot of OpManager's realtime graphsScreenshot of a device snapshot page in OpManagerScreenshot of Alarms in OpManager

ScienceLogic SL1 Screenshots

Screenshot of Application to infrastructure mapping with APM toolsScreenshot of CRM Business Service MapScreenshot of Mobile Banking Business Service Dashboard OverviewScreenshot of Mobile Banking Business Service Dashboard Availability ViewScreenshot of Mobile Banking Business Service Dashboard Anomalies ViewScreenshot of Business Services Leaderboard Dashboard Overview