Invited by the Vendor
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ManageEngine Endpoint Central | Score9.3 out of 10 | N/A | Desktop Central from ManageEngine is a client desktop management with patching, remote control, and configuration. | $795 per year per user |
| ManageEngine Endpoint Central | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| ManageEngine Endpoint Central | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Verified User Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central ManageEngine Endpoint Central was easier to use and more cost effective in the long run. It also provided a great integration with Service Desk Plus under one umbrella of products. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() It analyst in Information Technology at Mired (Financial Services, 51-200 employees) Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central I had already used SCCM in other companies, but when I joined the company I'm currently in, I started using Endpoint Central and I've been incredibly satisfied with the service and support. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() IT Systems Analyst in Information Technology at WD-40 Company Limited (Chemicals, 201-500 employees) Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central We did not use ManageEngine Endpoint Central over intune specifically, we run the solutions in parallel. This is ideal, as intune allows surface devices to be shipped and enrolled (no imaging, PXE or any intervention needed) The huge advantage of intune is we can ship the … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central I chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central because it allows me to update devices, deploy configurations, install software, remotely patch, and monitor vulnerabilities. Elegi ManageEngine Endpoint Central porque me permite actualizar equipos, desplegar configuraciones, instalar … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info ![]() IT Support in Information Technology at The Bernard Group (Printing, 501-1000 employees) Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central While some of these other Windows MDM solutions had some small improvements for something ManageEngine Endpoint Central does not have, I still find that ManageEngine Endpoint Central still has the biggest library, if you will, for functionality. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central It is overall better, locally deployed accessed via agent Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central more user friendly and superior documentation Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() System Administrator in Information Technology at Plains Commerce Bank (Banking, 501-1000 employees) Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central Haven't used anything else like it Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Senior Systems Engineer in Information Technology at MSL (Industrial Automation, 201-500 employees) Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central Used it many years ago, not relevant at the moment Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() System Analyst in Information Technology at Daland Corporation (Hospitality, 1001-5000 employees) Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central ManageEngine included remote tablet management, Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Network Engineer in Information Technology at Demgy EIS GmbH (Airlines/Aviation, 201-500 employees) Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central It holds up very well even against the microsoft native solution Microsoft Intune. The Configurations are easy to set up and apply quickly over the selected scope of Clients. You have a almost real time inventory of everything detected by the agent. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() IT Manager in Information Technology at Farmalabor Srl (Health, Wellness and Fitness, 51-200 employees) Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central ManageEngine Endpoint Central is strongly integrated with other products (ex. ServiceDesk). Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Infrastructure Engineer in Information Technology at CIPFA (Accounting, 201-500 employees) Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central I tend to use a combination of solutions to keep the estate running efficiently. ManageEngine Endpoint Central has more control over the timing of patching for users. Juggling users being able to work and keeping systems up to date with user satisfaction in mind is a monthly … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central Easier to implement, the agent can be deployed faster, the agent consumes fewer system resources. (TR) Einfacher zu implementieren, der Agent lässt sich schneller ausrollen, der Agent verbraucht weniger Systemressourcen Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central Its can always be integrated with ManageEngine other products, which is very useful. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() IT Manager - Hydraulics US & EMEA in Information Technology at PHC (Machinery, 201-500 employees) Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central Dollar for dollar, ManageEngine seems to be the most bang for your buck self-hosted solution. NinjaOne is cloud deployment only which can really add up over time, and KACE while better for scripting and asset management charges a premium for all of the extra modules that are … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central They have no point of comparison Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central The reporting on scripts is far better in ManageEngine, always showing the latest result. Unlike Intune which can run a script every day, but the "Report" only shows the result from the first time the script ran, it never refreshes. When we have had issues where the LAPS … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Director of Information Systems in Information Technology at InfuCare rx (Hospital & Health Care, 501-1000 employees) Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central Other product like XCitium does not do USB block and is more pricier. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central Compared to other product, cost, feature and easy management is main criteria to select ManageEngine Endpoint Central. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central Ease of use Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central Much better patching capabilities Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Senior Network Administrator in Information Technology at Unipart Rail (Railroad Manufacture, 201-500 employees) Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central More features better licensing Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
No answers on this topic | |
| ManageEngine Endpoint Central | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 (54 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.3 (6 ratings) |
| Usability | 7.9 (14 ratings) |
| Support Rating | 7.8 (7 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | 9.1 (1 ratings) |