ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Patch Manager Plus is an automated patch management software that provides enterprises with a single interface for all patch management tasks. The vendor claims it works across platforms, helping users patch Windows, Mac, Linux & 300+ third-party applications. With Automated Patch Deployments, users can automate the entire process of patch management:…
$245
50 endpoints
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator (formerly McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator) software centralizes and streamlines management of endpoint, network, data security, and compliance solutions.N/A
Pricing
ManageEngine Patch Manager PlusTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Editions & Modules
Professional
$245.00
50 endpoints
Enterprise
$345.00
50 endpoints
Professional
$345.00
50 endpoints
Enterprise
$445.00
50 endpoints
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ManageEngine Patch Manager PlusTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ManageEngine Patch Manager PlusTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Considered Both Products
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Chose ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Ivanti Endpoint Manager is used in my full-time job; for my purposes and my own customers, it would be too expensive and overpowered.
Chose ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
because it fits well in all our requirements
Chose ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus was easier to use, and you can basically set it and forget it. The performance is very good and we had way less failed patch than competing product.
Chose ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
We previously used Microsoft Windows Server Update Services (WSUS). The reporting was extremely limited and all remediation had to be done manually, you can't initiate a reboot or a manual install like you can from ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus. Creation of Automated Patching …
Chose ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
SolarWinds was not selected because it runs on top of SCCM which in itself is problematic and unreliable. We need an application that runs in standalone mode and does not rely on any other application. SolarWinds
Chose ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Patch Manager Plus does the most basic job of monitoring machines, deploying packages silently, and keeping machines up to date.
Chose ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus keeps our devices all under one pool.
Chose ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
The price point is the main reason on why Patch Manager Plus would be better, the better app would always be Defender for Windows environment, but for an environment which has multiple OS, its better to have a non-affiliated patching solution.
Chose ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Since we are using ManageEngine for quite a long time, this gives us more comfort than any other product which may not fulfil our needs if chosen.
Chose ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
We were talking to Action1 and Adaptiva about their solutions of patch management. The main factor of choosing ManageEngine was pricing, which was considerably lower compared to these tools. Also, for Action1, it didn't featured some important features (like Linux patching), …
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
This can be particularly beneficial for organizations with large and complex networks, as it simplifies the management and monitoring process. Trellix ePOoffers a range of customization options.. It allowing IT teams to tailor the solution to meet their specific needs.
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator really seemed to have all the best pieces in one platform and the network admin and asst. network admin both had previous experience with the product. The others tend to focus more on singular aspects, whereas McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has data …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
If you are using Microsoft Services or newer, cloud ones, it can be worth [it] to try their services but it may be very expensive because of the licensing thing and here Microsoft is very tricky and very difficult to decide the right one.
MalwareBytes is good product and adds …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
I have used Symantec Endpoint Encryption before. Symantec and EPO are both good in their own ways. EPO allows integration of other McAfee products. I have been using ePolicy Orchestrator for years. I have a lot of experience with the product. That is why I like it.
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Trend micro-endpoint management, Symantec/Norton AV
Compared to these, McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator provides a much more robust and extensible all-around deployment and ongoing management solution.
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
We selected McAfee EPO partly because we were already using McAfee VSE, but mostly because there are very few other AV management packages out there that offer the same level of enterprise management tools. That's where it really shines - deployment and management of AV in a …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
The price and the licensing options are very good. We were able to negotiate our pricing with plenty of flexibility ePO is one of the best administration console in the security world. Capability of deep customization are one of the biggest advantage. Ability to run PDF …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
I think McAfee is a strong competitor and holds up well when compared to other software of its kind. If McAfee antivirus is already being used then it makes sense to go with this product to add another layer of management to the network.
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
McAfee plays well in not only scanning the endpoint machines like the data which is shared through disks or pen drive but it also helps in internet security. With its wide range threat source it blocks users entering into malicious sites and also blocks suspicious things which …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Other products that were reviewed were Symantec's DLP and Forcepoint. The reason we ultimately went the ePolicy Orchestrator route was that we owned other McAfee products and the logic way to bring them together and to gain the maximum information was to bin them together with …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
We have not evaluated any other products in a very long time because moving to another AV product suite would be a very costly and long process. Another AV product would have to provide a very large cost reduction, performance improvements and unknown threat finding. We …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator

We were using Vipre Anti-virus for years and switched to McAfee. We gained better insight into our environment. Management felt more secure knowing that at any moment we could bring up reports into what was going on in our environment.

McAfee ePO was able to give us time back …

Features
ManageEngine Patch Manager PlusTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
-
Ratings
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
6.6
Ratings
18% below category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management Tools
Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Product A and Product B
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
-
Ratings
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
6.0
Ratings
30% below category average
IT Asset Realization00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Authentication00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Configuration Monitoring00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Web Scanning00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Intelligence00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ManageEngine Patch Manager PlusTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Small Businesses
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ManageEngine Patch Manager PlusTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Likelihood to Recommend
7.1
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ManageEngine Patch Manager PlusTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Likelihood to Recommend
Its a best tool for managing and patching an corporate environment, specially the dashboards and the UI which is relatively easy to adapt for someone without prior knowledge of Patching as well. If a company has Secure Gateway Server, then the remote deployment is a plus, it helps to even remotely deploy patches to the remote employees.
Read full review
McAffee ePolicy Orchestrator is very well suited in large environments. You can load your updates to the repository and deploy them to every node on your network. It has great reporting and auditing features. You can control your users and groups all from the System Tree. DLP is great for USB devices. You can restrict all the ports on a computer and open them up for a limited time to plug in a device. EPO is to bulky for small networks.
Read full review
Pros
  • All the patches are tested before delivered to us.
  • It's on cloud so we does not need to maintain Hardware and Network.
  • It also upgrades the hardware drivers & BIOS. But for BIOS only we use monthly updates no automatic policy just push to target computers.
Read full review
  • Applies the policy settings for the selected group
  • Keeps the hosts updated well, in general
  • Allows update of available software from within the management console
  • Assigns and runs ongoing tasks with little need for intervention
  • Provides quick high-level view of systems
Read full review
Cons
  • If this tool can fetch serial numbers of the devices on which this is deployed
  • This tool should collect all application installed at client machine which is not available as of now.
  • Intergate more application which can be patch using this tool.
Read full review
  • It has a slow mechanism when adding custom threat feeds. For example, if McAfee didn't have a signature or detection about a new virus and we try to add it to our console it is like a really big process in adding that to our available signatures.
  • Whenever a scan is performed, the system CPU utilization goes up 100 percent.
  • Installation fails due to difference in timestamp when we try to shuffle between packages.
Read full review
Usability
Very easy to use once you get used to it. It can be a little overwhelming at first since there is so many thing you can do. But as soon as you get use to it, it works like a charm.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The support team at Patch Manager Plus has been awesome. Very responsive and knowledgeable. There are times when there is confusion between different tickets but there is still good service.
Read full review
McAfee support is definitely GREAT! It is one of the best technical support on a business level. GOLD support is recommended to business. Their website is easy and quick to create a ticket. Their technical team usually responds right away with an email or call. Via call and web they provide a full and complete support until the issue is resolved. The best, most of the time they explain in detail what is the issue, the reason and how to resolve it.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
SolarWinds was not selected because it runs on top of
SCCM which in itself is problematic and unreliable. We need an application that
runs in standalone mode and does not rely on any other application. SolarWinds
is also one of the most expensive. Kaseya and GFI LanGuard are overkill as they contain
functionality that we do not need or already have. GFI LanGuard for instance
does security auditing the same as Qualys that we already have. Kaseya is a full
management and automation solution.
Read full review
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator really seemed to have all the best pieces in one platform and the network admin and asst. network admin both had previous experience with the product. The others tend to focus more on singular aspects, whereas McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has data loss prevention, encryption, anti-virus and other functionality and the excel on each of those points equally.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The tool is cheap compared to any quotes we asked for other suppliers
  • It helps us to accomplish remediation from the vulnerabilities reported by our vulnerability management software
  • It helps us to achieve our infosec goals of risk in our environment
Read full review
  • As with most things the price of products goes up and more-so if your business is growing.
  • We've been able to provide auditors with tangible evidence that our network is protected because of the reporting McAfee ePO provides. Auditors like McAfee because it's been around almost forever and is a mature product.
  • Being a mature product, though, it's very much set in the way it does things and as such there's not a whole lot of innovation.
Read full review
ScreenShots

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Screenshots

Screenshot of Home view and security news feedScreenshot of All patches viewScreenshot of All systems viewScreenshot of Automated patch deploymentScreenshot of Scope of managementScreenshot of Configurations