ManageWP vs. Umbraco CMS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
ManageWP is a WordPress management console that allows users to manage multiple WordPress sites with ease.N/A
Umbraco CMS
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
Umbraco is an open-source .NET Core CMS with over 700,000 active installs worldwide and with more than 200,000 active community members. It was first released on February 16th, 2005, and is still to this day an open-source project backed by a commercial company. To ensure Umbraco is always running the latest technology, the company has aligned with Microsoft's .NET release schedule to always have the Umbraco CMS…
$0
Pricing
ManageWPUmbraco CMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Umbraco Free
$0
Umbraco Starter
$53
per month
Umbraco Standard
$320
per month
Umbraco Professional
$860
per month
Umbraco Cloud Enterprise
Custom Pricing
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ManageWPUmbraco CMS
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsStarting is easy and free. Premium upgrades are there for those that need more. If you want to free up your time and let ManageWP do the heavy lifting - we are there for you with a number of automations (safe updates, automated backups, scheduled security and performance checks, etc.), site migration tools, website templates and more. Special bundles were built for agencies and companies creating affordable discounts for customers with large number of websites.The Umbraco CMS and all of its core features are the same across all plans.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ManageWPUmbraco CMS
Considered Both Products
ManageWP
Chose ManageWP
ManageWP is the only website management product that we have used.
Chose ManageWP
I'm not sure there are other free options in this space. I haven't heard of any.
Chose ManageWP
Jetpack is going to be a contender in the future, however, at this point in time they are missing some features that ManageWP includes and does very well. These include automatic backups and a robust migration module. Though the UI in Jetpack is a little cleaner and prettier, …
Chose ManageWP
ManageWP is definitely the best in class product for WordPress website management. There are other tools such as InfiniteWP that do similar things, but don't have as complete an offering. Other options like WPEngine are also for hosting and we are not interested in that …
Chose ManageWP
Prior to ManageWP, we utilized InfiniteWP, a free (with paid extensions), self-hosted alternative. We found the interface to be unwieldy, and the paid extension pricing to be a bit confusing. The headache of maintaining the software and server infrastructure to run the …
Umbraco CMS
Chose Umbraco CMS
We preferred Umbraco because it is built with .NET, and most of our team members have proficiency in .NET. Umbraco is open-source so it was free, we could deploy it anywhere - on-premise or cloud. Umbraco had all features which we needed - SEO support, multi-lingual support, …
Chose Umbraco CMS
Someone else selected before I came on board but I was open-minded and willing to give it a try.
Chose Umbraco CMS
The performance of Umbraco is as good as Episerver. The back office in Umbraco is cleaner and more intuitive than Episerver. Sitecore is a good CMS for large projects, but the learning curve for developers and editors is steep.
Chose Umbraco CMS
Umbraco's templating is far superior than WordPress, Drupal and Joomla, but it's update process is WAY behind those platforms. The release schedule of Umbraco is way to often and most releases are to fix something missed in the previous release and not an improvement or new …
Chose Umbraco CMS
  • The learning curve to develop a web application is very short. The time to market is then insignificant.
  • Umbraco is free and open source.
Chose Umbraco CMS
We chose Umbraco because of their technology, and it was better than our previous CMS, Orchard, which was too complicated even for programmers. Orchard was very good but to develop something it required a really strong knowledge of this framework. In Umbraco it seems to be …
Chose Umbraco CMS
We previously used Wordpress, however this was not easy to use, it was a complicated system and was limited in what we could achieve, there was a big outlay in buying bolts on and ensuring the system was safe. We found we where spammed loads, we tried to make it work however …
Chose Umbraco CMS
Both are comparable. We selected Umbraco CMS because it used .NET instead of PHP. I would recommend choosing the CMS that your staff and technical people will be the most comfortable with.
Chose Umbraco CMS
Umbraco provides the best bang-for-the-buck CMS option on a .NET platform for those that cannot afford Sitecore. It is much friendlier to use than Ektron, is free to use, has commercial grade plugins that are not overly expensive, and provides the functionality that most …
Chose Umbraco CMS
Umbraco vs WordPress
Umbraco has more flexibility and customization options, but less features, reliability/stability, and community support.
WordPress offers less customization for data and content, but it is immensely more stable, has better features /plugins, and includes an …
Chose Umbraco CMS
There is not really an alternative when it comes to CMS based on ASP.Net (MVC4 with Razor). There are a few frameworks, like Booststrap; however framework is not content management system.
I will compare it to Drupal, because the second one is well known. Against Drupal, …
Features
ManageWPUmbraco CMS
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
ManageWP
9.5
Ratings
16% above category average
Umbraco CMS
9.0
Ratings
11% above category average
Role-based user permissions9.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
ManageWP
10.0
Ratings
27% above category average
Umbraco CMS
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
API10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
ManageWP
8.2
Ratings
6% above category average
Umbraco CMS
8.0
Ratings
4% above category average
WYSIWYG editor8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Admin section9.80 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Page templates8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Library of website themes9.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design7.50 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Publishing workflow7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Form generator00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
ManageWP
7.0
Ratings
5% below category average
Umbraco CMS
7.2
Ratings
2% below category average
SEO support8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Bulk management10.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions3.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Community / comment management7.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Content taxonomy00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ManageWPUmbraco CMS
Small Businesses
Divi
Divi
Score 10.0 out of 10
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ManageWPUmbraco CMS
Likelihood to Recommend
9.6
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
3.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
2.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
3.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
4.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ManageWPUmbraco CMS
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well suited to anyone that has a Wordpress website, whether it be an individual or a company managing multiple clients sites, its an easy way to manage, maintain and keep your website running smoothly and secure.
Read full review
Umbraco is well suited for websites that are looking to do a wide range of activities that require complex technoligies. An example of this is a company with several different products or services. Umbraco would be overkill for simple sites that are mostly static. It is also difficult to find developers who have Umbraco experience, as it's market share is not all that high
Read full review
Pros
  • ManageWP consolidates important WordPress site management services into on dashboard.
  • ManageWP makes backing up, cloning, and restoring websites so easy.
  • ManageWP provides a simple, easy to use interface.
Read full review
  • Quick to learn. For most if cases, developer needs to know Razor coding.
  • Doesn't require back-end programming.
  • Has build in users management (developers, content managers) and members management consoles (users of the site).
  • Clear admin tool (especially in version 7)
  • Fast.
  • Creating code from scratch, so it is easier to create clean code.
Read full review
Cons
  • The reports could be prettier, more templates in order to avoid having to customize for each client so heavily.
  • It would be nice to see if recommended plugin updates are actually production and not beta versions.
Read full review
  • Migration of data between servers. There are tools that you can pay for that help facilitate this, but like any CMS system, there are still some tricks to getting it to work correctly.
  • Running as a Web Project instead of a Web Site. Umbraco does not run compiled code, but instead compiles it on the fly. I find this to cause some performance issues that would otherwise be resolved with a compiled code base.
Read full review
Usability
It's very straightforward for basic use, but less you dig in more for advanced use. Seems like it would be approachable to the average person.
Read full review
Umbraco CMS effectively addresses enterprise content management needs. It's quite mature .NET based CMS, standing out as a leader among its competitors. Websites built with Umbraco are blazing fast. Extensive customization capabilities, and user-friendly content publishing interface makes it an ideal choice for businesses looking for a mature CMS solution.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Occasionally, errors will appear in the admin that make it impossible to work without developer support.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Working in the admin panel (adding / reviewing / editing content) is very slow. The public facing site speed is dependent on what the pages are doing and how well the code was written (whether it is optimized for speed).
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Support for Umbraco-owned paid plugins is nonexistent.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Online training is often based on older versions of the platform. So, you'll have to fill in the gaps on your own.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Spend the time to wireframe the content structure prior to diving in. This helps speed the process of implementation and it serves as documentation for end users.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
ManageWP is definitely the best in class product for WordPress website management. There are other tools such as InfiniteWP that do similar things, but don't have as complete an offering. Other options like WPEngine are also for hosting and we are not interested in that element. I think that ManageWP is the best tool out there for what it does.
Read full review
We previously used WordPress, however this was not easy to use, it was a complicated system and was limited in what we could achieve, there was a big outlay in buying bolts on and ensuring the system was safe. We found we where spammed loads, we tried to make it work however after a year we decided to leave WordPress behind. The company did evaluated Adobe but the dev team decided that Umbraco was the best tool to meet our own needs.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
Without significant development, the product does not scale well.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Reduced update times - allows me to check for updates on all our sites once a week without spending countless time logging in and updating each one manually.
  • Free backups - allows me to have redundant backups just in case other systems fail, without any effort.
  • Free platform - many of the provided features are free, making it very useful for companies who want to keep costs low.
Read full review
  • CMS is free
  • Support form Umbraco HQ is not expensive, can include Courier or other functionality
  • For most cases does not need back end developer
  • For trained Umbraco developers (Razor coding, using admin tool), developing medium site, takes a few weeks max
Read full review
ScreenShots

ManageWP Screenshots

Screenshot of ManageWP Overview page with Action centerScreenshot of ManageWP Websites page - landing page for website managementScreenshot of ManageWP Add-ons/Price breakdown pageScreenshot of ManageWP Security check with vulnerabilities detected on a number of websites

Umbraco CMS Screenshots

Screenshot of Umbraco 8 backoffice UIScreenshot of Umbraco 8 side by side multilingual editingScreenshot of Umbraco 8 Content AppsScreenshot of Umbraco Cloud project overviewScreenshot of Umbraco Cloud environment overview