Mandiant Advantage Security Validation vs. Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

Mandiant Advantage Security Validation

Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Mandiant Advantage Security Validation	Score 8.3 out of 10	Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)	Since 2004, Mandiant has been a partner to security-conscious organizations. Mandiant’s approach helps organizations develop more effective and efficient cyber security programs and instills confidence in their readiness to defend against and respond to cyber threats.	N/A
Trellix Endpoint Security ENS	Score 8.0 out of 10	N/A	Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) solutions apply proactive threat intelligence and defenses across the entire attack lifecycle to keep organizations safer and more resilient.	N/A

Pricing

Mandiant Advantage Security Validation

Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Mandiant Advantage Security Validation	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Mandiant Advantage Security Validation	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
Considered Both Products	Mandiant Advantage Security Validation Piyush Mittal Senior Manager Chose Mandiant Advantage Security Validation There are many parameters which are the differentiator between mandiant and cymulate but some of the key differentitors are listed below: 1) Manpower costs are less and justified as compared to cymulate 2) Better technologies innovation Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Mandiant Advantage Security Validation Mandiant is focused on a clear view of the environment, vulnerabilities, and threats. Palo Alto is a great tool for some of this, but was not mature enough at the time of our initial eval. The new version of Palo Alto looks much more robust and capable and we will definitely … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Mandiant Advantage Security Validation Haven't done a direct comparison for Verodin and other similar products. But I compared Verodin port scanning with NMAP. Verodin provides an intuitive result. Incentivized Helpful?	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS At the time we took the decision all other products seemed to be complicated in usage and licensing. Trellix was very simple in all the aspects: licensing, usage, support. It also was very simple to deploy, setup and manage. Product interface was simple to understand and even … Incentivized Helpful? JC Jensen Concepcion IT head Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS All in one protection for endpoint devices, the data loss prevention, and adaptive threat protection is the best advantage against other competitors. The cost for the platform and service is very effective and efficient. The usage and capability of this software is very edge … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Unlike Trellix Endpoint Security Symantec Endpoint provides less information about events on the user side. Trellix give an opportunity to see information about virus detection on a user machine as quick as it possible, so we were able to catch the signs of virus propagation … Incentivized Helpful? Junior Pierre-Toussaint Senior Information Technology Security Officer Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS i've evaluated a few different solution but from different needs Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS FireEye Endpoint Security is my favorite EDR tool. It's a single pane of glass that fits nicely into the Helix and NX platforms. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS It has fewer false positive issues. It also provides more compatibility with a variety of different OS versions. The sensor installation is easy to use, update and maintain as well as the reporting capabilities that it can offer are more robust than the ones that other … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Compared to its competitors like Cisco, McAfee is cheaper. At the competitive pricing levels, McAfee Endpoint Security does a good job. Although it stacks up finely against decent priced solutions but it doesn't provide superior service if the price limit is scaled down or up. … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Compared to Endgame and AMP, McAfee Endpoint Security doesn't hold a candle to them when it comes to detecting/advanced identifying malware or zero days. Since Mcafee Endpoint Security is signature-based, it is way behind the curve with newer anti-malware tools that can focus … Incentivized Helpful? TP Tanish Pruthi Marketing Associate Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS We were using Microsoft Defender in the beginning as it was free and quite good. But as we got acquired by a large MNC, we were asked to switch to McAfee as we had to follow the company guidelines which takes data security very seriously and personally. I think the switch did … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS The solution is already in place when I join the organization. I do not have any information on what other antivirus software they evaluated before decided to purchase McAfee Endpoint Security. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS McAfee is a strong, if not strongest A/V solution in the endpoint security space. It's wide adoption and strong support and positive reviews from companies like Gartner and Forrester back it up. Incentivized Helpful? Ralf Richter Senior Solution Architect Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS If you have Cisco tools and equipment globally in place and just for the clients additionally McAfee you should have a deeper look. We wanted to install end-2-end security over all networks and hardware. This was a big point for Cisco. For a managed client team, Cisco is a step … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS McAfee Endpoint Security has a better GUI, better pricing, stronger features, and agent deployment is much faster. Their firewall is extremely good, and for those reasons I would firmly recommend it over other solutions (Kaspersky, Symantec etc). Like I mentioned earlier, do … Incentivized Helpful? Dharma raju DevOps Engineer/Linux Admin Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS McAfee Endpoint Security provides a single platform for Firewall, AV and web control. With the new console and integration between the components, threat detection is superior. Incentivized Helpful? Tom Parker Remote Facilities Systems Support Analyst Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Trend Micro is a better solution in our environment. It is easier to manage and seems to do a better job. Incentivized Helpful? Christopher "Scott" Pandolfo Security Specialist Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS McAfee is a cheaper price point, however Kaspersky out performs McAfee in every category. We went with McAfee, because many of the team members in IT were familar with it, less training (short term), and lower cost (short term) Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Advanced Threat Protection, or ATP in Office 365 was awful. Some attachments wouldn't be delivered at all while others took minutes and sometimes hours to be delivered after being scanned. It was causing us to lose business. FireEye processes attachments in less than 60 seconds … Incentivized Helpful? Roberta Jones IT Administrative Specialist Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS We only selected McAfee because we are already using ESET NOD32 for the protection of our desktops and laptops. We didn't want to use the same software for our servers so we chose McAfee instead. I personally like ESET Smart Security better than McAfee when deploying it on a … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Trellix Endpoint Security ENS interfaces better with other tools and is simpler to use. provides wider endpoint protection and more centralized control than SentinelOne's automatic response. Trellix Endpoint Security ENS preserves McAfee's dependability while offering newer … Incentivized Helpful?

Features

Mandiant Advantage Security Validation

Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

Endpoint Security

Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
	Mandiant Advantage Security Validation - Ratings	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS 8.8 Ratings 3% above category average
Anti-Exploit Technology	00 Ratings	9.30 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)	00 Ratings	8.80 Ratings
Centralized Management	00 Ratings	9.40 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support	00 Ratings	7.90 Ratings
Infection Remediation	00 Ratings	8.90 Ratings
Vulnerability Management	00 Ratings	8.20 Ratings
Malware Detection	00 Ratings	9.40 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Mandiant Advantage Security Validation	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic	ThreatLocker Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Microsoft Defender for Cloud Score 8.5 out of 10	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises	Microsoft Defender for Cloud Score 8.5 out of 10	BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Score 9.8 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Mandiant Advantage Security Validation	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
Likelihood to Recommend	8.2 (0 ratings)	9.3 (0 ratings)
Usability	8.2 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	5.0 (0 ratings)
Ease of integration	9.1 (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Mandiant Advantage Security Validation	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
Likelihood to Recommend	It is well-suited to larger enterprise environments and less well-suited to small businesses. You need some level of maturity to be able to fully utilize this tool, but overall it is fairly easy to get fully up and running within the environment, which is really nice. Well-suited if you have the budget for it and it saves on staff time to perform these functions. Not well-suited if you don't have a good budget in-place for your environment size. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	During the pandemic all our users worked remotely that was challenging from security perspective, so we had to deploy the endpoint protection system with cloud based monitoring server. By doing that we were able to keep safety for users workspaces even though some of them did not connect to VPN for a long time Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Testing of security controls Mitigation of Risk Return of investment Incentivized Piyush Mittal Senior Manager Read full review	Provides high fidelity alerting. Allows CSOC analysts to perform forensic triage and alert investigations through containment from a single pane of glass. Provides alert telemetry across on-disk and in-memory attacks. Supports many additional 'bolt-on' modules to provide additional alert context or capabilities. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Portal / Dashboard Integration across tools System resources efficiency Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	My biggest flak with McAfee Endpoint Security is that it is quite resource-intensive. It does tend to make the system a little slow. You get security at the expense of your machine's speed. Even though the drive encryption makes the system more secure, it takes a lot of time to first enter the very long password, and then for it to decrypt the whole machine. This sometimes clashes with Windows update and causes a lot of complications which leads to boot loops. Incentivized TP Tanish Pruthi Marketing Associate Read full review
Usability	The product is easy to use, it is a useful tool, and has good support. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	So below is my breakdown, Pro's: Centralized Management, Comprehensive Protection and customization. Con's: Initial cost Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	No answers on this topic	The support is pretty good, and I haven't had any issues with getting the highest quality technical support when there are issues. Tech support representatives that I have dealt with know the product quite well and have solved many issues that I have had with the product in the past. The only issue I have with support is that it can be quite expensive. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	There are many parameters which are the differentiator between mandiant and Cymulate but some of the key differentitors are listed below: 1) Manpower costs are less and justified as compared to Cymulate 2) Better technologies innovation 3) Good reputation in market 4) Good cummulative man hour experience Also, they are in the market from last 20 years and they have a huge client base. Incentivized Piyush Mittal Senior Manager Read full review	We only selected McAfee because we are already using ESET NOD32 for the protection of our desktops and laptops. We didn't want to use the same software for our servers so we chose McAfee instead. I personally like ESET Smart Security better than McAfee when deploying it on a desktop or laptop because I think it protects the PC better. When it comes to web protection, policy updates, etc., McAfee is the better choice and that's why we deployed it on our servers. Incentivized Roberta Jones IT Administrative Specialist Read full review
Return on Investment	Help data-driven and informed decision making. Improve company security postures. Visualization Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	This tool helped us in delegating the asset safety responsibility to the client level by 80%, leaving 20% for the management console. With a decent pricing, the benefits are slightly above expectations. The ROI is good. But, considering most of the malware comes from internet, with a good email security appliance and next gen firewall in place, the online security alerts are now redundant. It could be something that can be termed as overkill on the budget. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	Mandiant Advantage Security Validation Screenshots	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Screenshots