Mandiant Advantage Security Validation vs. Zscaler Private Access

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Mandiant Advantage Security Validation
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Since 2004, Mandiant has been a partner to security-conscious organizations. Mandiant’s approach helps organizations develop more effective and efficient cyber security programs and instills confidence in their readiness to defend against and respond to cyber threats.N/A
Zscaler Private Access
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Zscaler Private Access™ (ZPA) gives users secure access to private apps and OT devices while enabling zero trust connectivity for workloads.N/A
Pricing
Mandiant Advantage Security ValidationZscaler Private Access
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Mandiant Advantage Security ValidationZscaler Private Access
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Mandiant Advantage Security ValidationZscaler Private Access
Considered Both Products
Mandiant Advantage Security Validation
Chose Mandiant Advantage Security Validation
There are many parameters which are the differentiator between mandiant and cymulate but some of the key differentitors are listed below:
1) Manpower costs are less and justified as compared to cymulate
2) Better technologies innovation
Chose Mandiant Advantage Security Validation
Mandiant is focused on a clear view of the environment, vulnerabilities, and threats. Palo Alto is a great tool for some of this, but was not mature enough at the time of our initial eval. The new version of Palo Alto looks much more robust and capable and we will definitely …
Chose Mandiant Advantage Security Validation
Haven't done a direct comparison for Verodin and other similar products. But I compared Verodin port scanning with NMAP. Verodin provides an intuitive result.
Zscaler Private Access
Chose Zscaler Private Access
Ivanti had its moment. However moving to Zscaler Private Access was the best decision for us. Zscaler Private Access is faster, smoother UI and has heaps of feature that, in my opinion, makes it tower over Ivanti. The authenticate early option, ensures we don't loose connection …
Chose Zscaler Private Access
Cisco Secure Access, Cisco AnyConnect and Ivanti Secure Unified Client
Chose Zscaler Private Access
Zscaler Private Access is a better fit for overall Zero Trust ecosystem.
Chose Zscaler Private Access
All of these tools are for different needs. Zscaler Private Access being for internal seems very simple as it really only allows filtering up to L4 whereas ZIA allows for filtering up to L7. ZDX often tries to give insight into the environment but since it only works with …
Chose Zscaler Private Access
Zscaler Private Access was chosen as trusted VPN system versus Cisco, due to better licensing model, more flexible configuration of the security protocols, verification scenarios. Also it
Chose Zscaler Private Access
We had a nightmare experience with Prisma Access. The tool was not the most intuitive, and their peripherals to make it more secure were not efficient. Their integration with other tools to provide MFA was mediocre at best. That is the main reason we decided to explore …
Chose Zscaler Private Access
Well ZPA is a good solution, however everyone has their own advantage and disadvantages, with ZPA you can deploy ZTNA model, which will help you better control on access, however Palo Alto, Fortinet they are also market leading firewall solution, and you can not deny if they …
Chose Zscaler Private Access
We originally used Cisco AnyConnect but when the pandemic hit and everyone started working remotely the Cisco VPN just couldn't handle the massive increase in users. The connection was unreliable both inability to connect and stay connected. It also seemed to include a lot more …
Chose Zscaler Private Access
Both are good but sometimes relationship and cost is the factor to decide the final vendor.
Features
Mandiant Advantage Security ValidationZscaler Private Access
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Mandiant Advantage Security Validation
-
Ratings
Zscaler Private Access
10.0
Ratings
13% above category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Zero Trust Security
Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of Product A and Product B
Mandiant Advantage Security Validation
-
Ratings
Zscaler Private Access
10.0
Ratings
7% above category average
Continuous Verification00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Secure Web Gateways00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Network Flow Control00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Network Data Encryption00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Network Topology Mapping00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Mandiant Advantage Security ValidationZscaler Private Access
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Score 8.5 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Score 8.5 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Mandiant Advantage Security ValidationZscaler Private Access
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Mandiant Advantage Security ValidationZscaler Private Access
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well-suited to larger enterprise environments and less well-suited to small businesses. You need some level of maturity to be able to fully utilize this tool, but overall it is fairly easy to get fully up and running within the environment, which is really nice. Well-suited if you have the budget for it and it saves on staff time to perform these functions. Not well-suited if you don't have a good budget in-place for your environment size.
Read full review
The tool is, for the most part, very intuitive. Most of our issues so far (working through them with our Resident Engineer) are the one-off applications. We are working on some exemptions to make them functional. Besides that, the team loves the tool and how it can provide better security than our previous tool.
Read full review
Pros
  • Testing of security controls
  • Mitigation of Risk
  • Return of investment
Read full review
  • Allows strong cyber security corporate policies
  • Very reliable VPN application that operates at 100% efficiency
  • Very easy to be configured with friendly user interface
Read full review
Cons
  • Portal / Dashboard
  • Integration across tools
  • System resources efficiency
Read full review
  • Granularity and Complexity of Policy Enforcement
  • Application Segmentation and Listener Configuration - The way applications are defined and listened for is fundamental to ZPA, but can be a source of frustration, especially when dealing with legacy or non-HTTP protocols
  • The ZCC is the user's primary gateway, but its control over local system network behavior can sometimes clash with enterprise requirements.
Read full review
Usability
The product is easy to use, it is a useful tool, and has good support.
Read full review
Few things stand out. The ease of access: It very convenient - one click to open add details and done. Packet capture: Can't talk enough about this feature. Troubleshooting private access is always problematic,but this feature helped a lot. One thing that can be improved is early warning about expiring authentication
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
There are many parameters which are the differentiator between mandiant and Cymulate but some of the key differentitors are listed below: 1) Manpower costs are less and justified as compared to Cymulate 2) Better technologies innovation 3) Good reputation in market 4) Good cummulative man hour experience Also, they are in the market from last 20 years and they have a huge client base.
Read full review
All of these tools are for different needs. Zscaler Private Access being for internal seems very simple as it really only allows filtering up to L4 whereas ZIA allows for filtering up to L7. ZDX often tries to give insight into the environment but since it only works with preconfigured items, that then means when a new problem shows up - ZDX isn't helpful troubleshooting postmortem. For the internal side of the house - Zscaler Private Access' strength is its simplicity to configure.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Help data-driven and informed decision making.
  • Improve company security postures.
  • Visualization
Read full review
  • Positive: We have now charged users internally for the service
  • Negative: Dealing with users who also have the Zscaler Client Connector for their company, can cause confusions
  • Negative: Enabling the Zscaler Internet Access entitlement has been a major headache for us because Zscaler Private Access users can't autheniticate through ZIA on a non corporate device.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Mandiant Advantage Security Validation Screenshots

Screenshot of SECURITY VALIDATION PLATFORM - Visualize and generate performance data on how security controls across  people, process and technologies respond to active adversary attacksScreenshot of Threat Actor Assurance Dashboard- Visualize how your security controls perform against real threat actor TTPs by operationalizing threat intelligence source.

Zscaler Private Access Screenshots

Screenshot of how ZPA provides access for all users while minimizing the attack surface, eliminating lateral movement, and stopping zero day threats. A cloud native service, ZPA can be deployed in just hours to replace legacy remote access tools like VPNs and VDIs.