Since 2004, Mandiant has been a partner to security-conscious organizations. Mandiant’s approach helps organizations develop more effective and efficient cyber security programs and instills confidence in their readiness to defend against and respond to cyber threats.
N/A
Splunk Enterprise Security
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Splunk Enterprise Security is an analytics-driven SIEM that helps to combat threats with actionable intelligence and advanced analytics at scale.
N/A
Pricing
Mandiant Advantage Threat Intelligence
Splunk Enterprise Security
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Mandiant Advantage Threat Intelligence
Splunk Enterprise Security
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
Priced by company size
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Mandiant Advantage Threat Intelligence
Splunk Enterprise Security
Considered Both Products
Mandiant Advantage Threat Intelligence
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Mandiant Advantage Threat Intelligence
There are multiple SaaS based players offering Threat Intel. But Mandiant TI has the following features which makes it one of the best among the competitors: 1.It understands recent actor, malware or vulnerability trends making it very easy for the analysts to do the research 2.Th…
Broadcom, though it has similar functionality, is a bit expensive in terms of licensing and the feature set available for integration into the existing environment.
The Mandiant Advantage Threat intelligence can evaluate and find the holes in the existing security countermeasures, giving the option to detect vulnerabilities and threats in advance. We can do device health checks periodically, making it possible to identify the weaknesses …
The interface and clearly the analysis provided was much better as compared to other tools. Also, it is more integrable and provided real updates, the logs are also detailed and clear to navigate to the issues.
It gives more ways to analyze threats and options to fixed it. This device gives more visibility on vulnerability detection and its analysis. It provides detailed reports to have more information of all malwares which help us to increase overall security of our current …
I feel that Mandiant Advantage Threat Intelligence is a reputable company with a history of excellent incident response that is well known in the APT space.
I am glad we chose Mandiant Advantage Threat Intelligence for two reasons: They have a very responsive customer support team available 24 hours a day, seven days a week and the dashboard UX is easy to use and attractive.
Recorded Future and ThreatQuotient are in the same ballpark when it comes to price. Mandiant Advantage Threat Intelligence had, at the time of use, the best tracking of unclassified threat actors and the best methodology for assessing the overlap between campaigns and actors. …
For this comparison, I use Intel471, another intelligence platform that I also use on a daily basis. Although it has its differences, the main objective is to provide intelligence to the analyst. Although it is true that Mandiant Advantage Threat Intelligence has higher waiting …
Mandiant Advantage Threat Intelligence offers a wide range of detections that BlueVoyant Digital Risk Protection doesn't cover in my opinion. The software brings a different level of detail that the competitors didn't.
Mandiant provides timely expert analysis for each vulnerability in the vulnerability intelligence feed. Most other solutions are just aggregators of vulnerability data that they synthesize into a feed but don't provide their own expert analysis.
If you want threat intel coming into your EDR, Email gateway, and IPS, this is the most cost-effective solution. The others can only pump into your SIEM and rely on monitoring and detection. The former goes into active defense, aka active blocking.
LogRhythm is good for a team comprising mostly non-technical IT users. Unlike Splunk, it has a GUI log search and a good ticketing system. Splunk is better than Logrhythm for me as it provides me with the ultimate flexibility to write custom queries. Scalyr is a good tool and …
I did not choose this product. Overall although I like ES, I think Sentinel in certain ways is the superior product. The Kusto Query language is a lot easier to use. For instance anything that requires manual parsing in query can be more difficult with this product. Also some …
AlienVault is much more user and beginner friendly, however Splunk ES very much so provides more capability for mass data manipulation, report and dashboard customization, and trend analytics.
These two really helps in better way and low cost and high productivity. Automatic detection ML help you to detect many ways and create cases based on risk score GRS UBA helps to protect organization from data ,via sharing through emails and USB s . Gurucu product license once …
Splunk enterprise is the only solution that we’ve been able to identify that provides risk based alerting, which allows our SOC to reduce analyst fatigue which would be a huge problem without it. Before RBA, there were thousands of alerts a day and it was impossible to review …
I consider Splunk Enterprise Security to have the strongest deployment methodology and troubleshoot features. Other products also provide good solutions such as Riverbed, Broadcom and Solarwinds but I think Splunk Enterprise Security is a great and trustable option to use for …
Even though Splunk ES is not the cheapest solution on the markt, we found it was still cheaper compared to Secureworks we had before. Also the level of flexibility and "thinking with the customer" is much better now.
Traditional hardware logging mechanisms do not provide in-depth research data on the threats and signatures, while Splunk Enterprise Security could easily achieve this feat.
FortiAnalzer is a hardware solution, but with Splunk, we could identify as well get the correct solution for the active threats and too with accurate and precise detailing.
- Schema on the fly indexing --> Gives you faster index searches. Even if you use Datamodes, it's 100x time faster as well. - Correlation with other domains easily gives you total visibility and reduces the time to investigate and understand the problem. - With lookups and trust, …
Securonix does not nearly meet the scale, extensibility, and maturity that Splunk ES offers. However, when looking at the MSP architecture options, Securonix is a much more flexible platform for multi-tenanting. So, Splunk ES for captive SOC platforms and Securonix for …
Splunk ES is by far the best solution in the market as per flexibility, features and support. Cost-wise, it is the most expensive option to go with, but that has its own advantages as the product that we get is premium and superior to other SIEM. The best thing about Spunk ES …
Splunk Enterprise Security allows for data normalization that does not compare to other SIEMs such as QRadar or Trustwave. QRadar requires custom dsm parsers before the data can be onboarded. I appreciate that Splunk Enterprise Security can ingest any source of data and …
LogRhythm is a superior SIEM from a purely security/SOC perspective in my opinion. However, Splunk shines if you have an expert behind the wheel or if the organization is quite large - as my experience with LogRhythm indicated it couldn't handle large-size organizations.
Splunk does not hide its correlation and analytics logic from users as much as other solutions in the same space. While some features are harder to access the underlying information is all accessible and tunable. This gives Splunk an edge over other solutions that lock the …
Splunk Enterprise Security is superior in the logging aspect and searching. That’s why it was easier to pick switch to Splunk Enterprise Security. Arcsight is however superior in the correlation and stability aspect. It’s very reliable and stable that we sometimes forget that …
Mandiant Advantage Threat Intelligence is well suited to data enrichment tasks and surfacing additional potential indicators of compromise based on observables found in an environment. Difficulties arise if the given data is classified in multiple platform modules, each requiring a different subscription. When tracking an indicator of compromise and wanting to see what actors it relates to and further understand the actor, you often end up with one side of the data or the other. IOCs with little campaign context or actor details with no tactical data.
Its best feature is its user interface, which is easy to navigate and understand. All you need is a little tutorial on how to use the Splunk query language and you're done.
Logs can be easily uploaded or shared across multiple platforms and display a highly insightful graphical representations of data using graphs, tables, and many other formats.
Mandiant Advantage Threat Intelligence is a great cyber intelligence service with a great team of professional analysts. They provide quick responses to queries or incidents that require further investigation or information. Additionally, they provide personalized treatment as well as monthly meetings to coordinate teams. We have high reliability in the results obtained, as well as a large number of daily reports and trends.
You definitely need to learn how to use Splunk to get the most of the tool. There are many courses available for free to get up to speed on the usability of the tool but it's not that simple. It will take time to digest all the data and to understand how to query for what you are looking for.
ES requires a very performant infrastructure: if it has it's performant, otherwise not. I had situation with a very performant infrastructure and I didn't notized that it was a distributed architecture, it seemed that there ware few data on my PC, othewise I experienced less performant infrastructures with less performaces.
It's good when it's responsive, but I've had times where I had to wait quite a while for a response. But these are typically the exceptions rather than the rule. When you do get a response it is always well-informed and appropriate. I would say they've been trending better over time with this.
I experienced only on-line training, but the trainers were very professional and competent. Maybe it could be more useful if they also have an experience in projects because sometimes they didn't have a real project experience to communicate to the students. Anyway, it was very interesting and I learned many thing that's very difficoult (or maybe impossible!) to have by myself, aven if I have more than 10 years of Splunk activity experience.
It was very interesting and I learned many thing that's very difficoult (or maybe impossible!) to have by myself. The only problem was that, when I worked with the Splunk Professional Services, I found some difference between the training contents and the information from PS. In addition is required a long experience on Splunk Enterprise for the data ingestion part, in other words I'm able to work with ES because I'm worling on Splunk since 11 years, otherwise I'd some problem.
There are multiple SaaS based players offering Threat Intel. But Mandiant TI has the following features which makes it one of the best among the competitors: 1.It understands recent actor, malware or vulnerability trends making it very easy for the analysts to do the research 2.Threat Profiling of the organization and setting the rules proactively hunt threat actors targeting the organization. 3.Accelerating the threat response by prioritizing the threats that matter most helping the analysts priortize the threats. 4.Access threat intelligence via the platform, the browser plugin or APIs
LogRhythm is good for a team comprising mostly non-technical IT users. Unlike Splunk, it has a GUI log search and a good ticketing system. Splunk is better than Logrhythm for me as it provides me with the ultimate flexibility to write custom queries. Scalyr is a good tool and quite frankly lot faster than Splunk. However, I prefer Splunk because of its better Dashboards and panel customization abilities. Elastic is another amazing tool. It is hard to choose between the two especially because both have different sets of logs on them. I use both. Elastic for internal server logs, Splunk for everything else.
We have on prem splunk and it’s mostly east to setup, but we have issues keeping data separated between customer splunk deployments while at the same time only having to look at one SIEM to address events in every environment
We have a 100% success rate on all our ES implementations due to the amazing documentation and Splunk enablement on the subject.
Our Splunk ES business has grown 100% YoY for the last 3 years.
In terms of long term management and maintenance, ES has been highly stable and predictable, reducing our overhead on costly services team for ad hoc maintenance work.