Maple vs. RXNT

Maple is very useful in following scenarios :

• When doing some equation modelling for differential equations
• Writing code to simulate a electrical of mathematical system
• Speech and Image Processing Use case
• Linear Algebra Problems
• Lot of Options to plot 2-D and 3-D, including implicit, contour, complex, polar, vector field, conformal, density, ODE, PDE, and, statistical plot
• Engineering plots, including time and frequency domain responses and root-locus and root-contour plots

Incentivized

I believe it is best suited for organizations that wish to utilize all of the available tools within the system. I do not believe it is well suited for organizations that lack a deep understanding of the revenue cycle process or individuals who try to cut corners in managing accounts receivables. It works extraordinarily well in situations where one will take the time to set up all the available tools, test them, and make them part of their workflow.

Incentivized

• Numerical Calculation and Calculus
• Visualization of statistical and numerical data
• Predefined code templates for standard problem like finding FFT

Incentivized

• Patient portal, communications with patients and an easy to use platform for communciation.
• Auto posting features and claim scrubbing tools.
• Claim management and the ability to easily work to correct claims errors, rejections, and denials.
• Easy customizable reporting tools for administrative analysis on our perfromance.

Incentivized

• On the software side and the software is bulky
• Code Editor can be improved
• Sometime software fails and hang when doing high calculation

Incentivized

• The ads are very annoying and distracting. I would like to see these removed.
• Sometimes when using the prescribing feature, the list of meds is unscrollable. This is likely a glitch that could be fixed.
• Same thing after choosing a pharmacy. The preview page of Rx is unscrollable, making it impossible to see all of them. Would like to see this fixed as well.
• Would like to be able to add more templates under the macros but it is not clear how to do this.

Incentivized

This is exactly what we needed and I can’t think of of another system that can give us better service and customer support for a better price.

Incentivized

Having used other systems, there are still items I would like to see added to this platform. Additional forms, understanding of how to load those forms into the system. Ability for clients to access those forms. And the ability to upload forms that are coming in externally. This would be helpful.

Incentivized

We have not had any issues being able to connect.

Incentivized

No issues at all. We could not be happier with this system

Incentivized

Super quick response to any questions I have had

Incentivized

Gabrielle and all the rest of our trainers were great!

Incentivized

It was fantastic! The training was easy and everyone was very helpful and knowledgeable throughout the whole process

Incentivized

Maple is a very niche product and competes directly with Mathematica and MATLAB. It is a little expensive as compared to the other two however has more set of functions and libraries which makes it for suitable for high level and complex mathematics. It's editor is not on par with other two however it's visualization module is very good and powerful.

Incentivized

RXNT offers better quality and more customization for the cost. Valant was very expensive regardless if you wanted a few features or the entire EHR. eClinical Works is easy to duplicate records but then it can take a while to update with current information. And their updated version...you might need a magnifying glass especially if you are using on a laptop. I love the larger font and overall appeal of RXNT much better

Incentivized

It fits our needs perfectly

Incentivized

• It saves time and does lot of hard calculation which is not possible manually
• Software is little bit expensive however has more functions as compared to Matlab and Mathematica
• Learning curve is little steep and hence take additional time to master

Incentivized

• I've only been using for 2 mo so I can't answer this quite yet.
• I do know that the cost is much more affordable and an excellent value for the cost.
• I am a single provider practice so I have had to learn the admin side and the provider side which has been a challenge at times.

Incentivized