Mashery (now part of Boomi) vs. UiPath Integration Service

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Mashery (now part of Boomi)
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Mashery, for a time sold as TIBCO Cloud API Management, was an API management solution whose former capabilities have been added to Boomi's enterprise platform.N/A
UiPath Integration Service
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
UiPath Integration Service (including technology from Cloud Elements, following UiPath's acquisition of the company in 2021) is a cloud API integration service that uses cooperative apps to connect an organization’s customers, partners and employees to the cloud services they use. The vendor says that by using their pre-built elements, their one-to-many approach connects applications with services, each through a single API. The organization’s app can instantly share data with other applications…N/A
Pricing
Mashery (now part of Boomi)UiPath Integration Service
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Mashery (now part of Boomi)UiPath Integration Service
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Mashery (now part of Boomi)UiPath Integration Service
Considered Both Products
Mashery (now part of Boomi)
Chose Mashery (now part of Boomi)
AWS API Gateway
Azure API Gateway
Chose Mashery (now part of Boomi)
Far more expensive than Mashery, no support on migrating data from Mashery to Apigee. If you wish to migrate you are on your own.
Chose Mashery (now part of Boomi)
We've use Red Hat CloudForms, but we prefer TIBCO Mashery.
Chose Mashery (now part of Boomi)
Other providers have been considered, such as Mulesoft and IBM. The choice for Tibco was primarily inspired because of the existing partnership, and the flexibility of their offering.
Chose Mashery (now part of Boomi)
For us, it was an easy decision as we used other TIBCO solutions that well integrated with TIBCO Cloud Mashery.
Chose Mashery (now part of Boomi)
Mashery, in its deploy anywhere approach, protects web and non-web applications. It is flexible and holds its own against AWS's Web Application Firewall.
Chose Mashery (now part of Boomi)
Amazon API Gateway mainly. We find AWS is innovating very fast in the space. For the user's already with workloads running in AWS, it's easier to integrate with many other value add services like security and monitoring.
Chose Mashery (now part of Boomi)
TIBCO Cloud Mashery rates easier to use in API implementation and deployment. It also allows combining multiple APIs into packages which can be consumed by different applications.
Chose Mashery (now part of Boomi)
We use session management with TIBCO Cloud Mashery and we really love it.
Chose Mashery (now part of Boomi)
TIBCO Cloud Mashery is equal to or better than each of these competitors in many areas.
Chose Mashery (now part of Boomi)
Our selection process happened in 2016. TIBCO Mashery's easy hybrid deployment model was the reason why we decided on Mashery over Apigee. AKAMAI API gateway is now a new tool on the market evolving really fast but was not available yet when we went through the selection …
Chose Mashery (now part of Boomi)
When the evaluation of API Management was done, the market for a cloud, SaaS offering was limited. The short timeline for setting up TIBCO Cloud Mashery and the quick enablement of the developer portal have been major decision criteria.
Chose Mashery (now part of Boomi)
Mashery was already installed when I took over the project. I have not worked extensively with other platforms.
Chose Mashery (now part of Boomi)
I've really only looked at Mashery since it has been around a very long time and has a rich feature set. I do know our platform teams are looking into AWS gateway but not sure this product has everything we need.
Chose Mashery (now part of Boomi)
When we were first trying to identify an API Gateway provider, we evaluated Mashery and Apigee and chose Mashery because they were more competitive on cost. Now that we are with Mashery, we have not considered other vendors.

We do use Amazon's API Gateway service for some …
Chose Mashery (now part of Boomi)
I use Mashery because it is very easy to use and it can help some of the older people in my firm to understand how to use Mashery in the new programs in terms of back end and front end development. It also allows other competitors to not be needed and allows me to use other …
UiPath Integration Service
Chose UiPath Integration Service
Cloud Elements was an established partner before I started working for the organization. I did not review alternatives.
Chose UiPath Integration Service
Multi-touch point integrations and developer friendly. More expensive but better features.
Chose UiPath Integration Service
Cloud Elements was the vendor that had the largest catalog of technologies to integrate with, had support during the sales and development process, and provided go-to-market assistance that others did not offer. We chose them because of their suite of services and offerings and …
Chose UiPath Integration Service
MuleSoft is also a similar product to Cloud Elements, but is not available as an option in this form. Workato and MuleSoft are competing cloud API connector platforms that perform a similar function to Cloud Elements. We chose Cloud Elements over them because CE provided a …
Chose UiPath Integration Service
At the time we found Cloud Elements we found no other option that had a Unified API for cloud storage providers.
Features
Mashery (now part of Boomi)UiPath Integration Service
API Management
Comparison of API Management features of Product A and Product B
Mashery (now part of Boomi)
6.9
Ratings
18% below category average
UiPath Integration Service
-
Ratings
API access control8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Rate limits and usage policies7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
API usage data7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
API user onboarding7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
API versioning7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Usage billing and payments4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
API monitoring and logging6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Mashery (now part of Boomi)UiPath Integration Service
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Make
Make
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Mashery (now part of Boomi)UiPath Integration Service
Likelihood to Recommend
7.6
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Mashery (now part of Boomi)UiPath Integration Service
Likelihood to Recommend
TIBCO Cloud Mashery allows you to quickly enable API access control and management together with quick and easy setup of the developer portal. It focuses on core API management with limited integration features (filters, adapters, orchestration) - so TIBCO Cloud Mashery is mostly suited in a setup which already addresses integration features with other products.
Read full review
Areas where it would be appropriate:
  1. If you want a really 'deep' integration with a third party software, and you want all the control over how it interacts with your software
  2. If you want a totally white-labeled solution, that is totally invisible to your customers.
  3. if you care more about a well thought out/useful API, rather than a pretty UI
Areas where it is less appropriate:
  1. If you want a Zapier-esque hands-off integration for YOU.
  2. if you want your customers to do more of the work, pay for it/etc.
  3. if you're a really small business, it could be too expensive. But it depends on your individual contract with them.
Read full review
Pros
  • Throttling of requests helps prevent DOS attacks. Attackers try to wreak havoc wherever they can. Mashery helps you control your environments to throttle every endpoint independently.
  • The interface for setting endpoints is very intuitive and makes real-time adjustment easy to do.
  • TIBCO Cloud Mashery support is superb. I do not have to go to their website to know of any issues. They are proactive in communicating with their customers
Read full review
  • Customer Support -- They have a knowledgeable team and are very responsive.
  • Communication -- Most questions are addressed quickly
  • Documentation -- The API documentation is well organized and easy to follow.
Read full review
Cons
  • Mashery should allow orchestration and transformation out of the box rather than it being a service or having to buy additional services.
  • The dashboard is easy to use but I think it needs a face lift and it needs to start using TIBCO Spotfire to make it more of a analytical engine.
Read full review
  • There weren't really many cons to our experience. The only slight downside was the cost but they worked with us on that to make it work.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Ease of use.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
i find some of the package adding and key are complex . UI experience is bad . Every step need front and backward navigation too much. It would be better if endpoint itself contain package and key addiction option
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Support has been good overall.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Initially it was difficult to understand . after few day , it was easy
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Our selection process happened in 2016. TIBCO Mashery's easy hybrid deployment model was the reason why we decided on Mashery over Apigee. Akamai API Gateway is now a new tool on the market evolving really fast but was not available yet when we went through the selection process. Tyk is open source and evolving very fast, but 2 years back, it was not mature enough. That might have changed now.
Read full review
MuleSoft is also a similar product to Cloud Elements, but is not available as an option in this form.

Workato and MuleSoft are competing cloud API connector platforms that perform a similar function to Cloud Elements. We chose Cloud Elements over them because CE provided a more robust path to unifying the behavior of connected systems.

Zapier is a workflow automation tool that I feel draws erroneous comparison to Cloud Elements that I need to highlight. Workflow automation tools (Zapier, IFTTT, Microsoft Flow) do provide multiple integrations, but for simplistic scenarios where only a handful of explicitly described steps need accomplished. Cloud Elements is a platform for developers to deliver faster and with higher reliability than making integrations one-by-one in complex systems that solve demanding problems.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Mashery enabled us to go to market quicker because we didn't have to write systems for authentication and security for ourselves.
  • Mashery helps our MTTR when we have issues because we can use their transaction logs to identify and troubleshoot issues.
Read full review
  • We are able to build integrations in HALF the time we could build them from scratch.
  • They allow our development team to spend more hours focused on developing our core product, not connections to other products.
  • Their large catalog of services to connect to allows us to spend much less time researching other platform integration endpoints and increases our R&D speed a considerable amount.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Mashery (now part of Boomi) Screenshots

Screenshot of