Mediawide vs. OpenText Documentum

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Mediawide
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Mediawide offers you a SaaS marketing platform to help you ADAPT, LOCALIZE AND PERSONALIZE your global marketing campaigns effectively. The platform support all kinds of media requirements for video, digital personalization and print ads.N/A
OpenText Documentum
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
OpenText acquired Documentum from Dell EMC in 2017, and now supports the enterprise content management (ECM) system. The vendor says users can build content-centric applications and solutions from collaborating on business documents to delivering case-based applications to managing highly precise processes in the most regulated business environments.N/A
Pricing
MediawideOpenText Documentum
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MediawideOpenText Documentum
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
MediawideOpenText Documentum
Considered Both Products
Mediawide
OpenText Documentum
Chose OpenText Documentum
Sharepoint and others are a bit late to the party -- they have some nice features, but are leaders in the suite spot areas that we found OpenText helping us with.
Chose OpenText Documentum
At the time it was purchased it was one of the best, most robust solutions available on the market.
Chose OpenText Documentum
Features and underlying technology and development roadmap are much better for both Docushare and Confluence. OpenText product was preselected when I came into the implementation of the project. It should not have been.
Chose OpenText Documentum
Subjective but here's how I see it:
Heavy duty (in order of how much they can do and how much they can handle): 1)Documentum, 2)FileNet 3)OpenText
Middle duty: 1)WCC-WebCenter Content, 2)Alfresco, 3)M-Files (3rd b/c it is Windows only), 4)Nuxeo (only b/c of its newish approach …
Chose OpenText Documentum
We have evaluated IBM Filenet, Alfresco and Oracle WCM. Documentum has a very strong business process management system, security and scalability. It's not just a web content management system, it's an enterprise content management system with very good capabilities for …
Chose OpenText Documentum
We selected EMC Documentum because of its robustness and scalability.
Chose OpenText Documentum
While Livelink has many more modules out of the box and provide some more functionality which can be applied to document lifecycle without writing any customizations, from the support perspective Documentum is much cheaper to support and it is much more stable than Opentext ECM …
Chose OpenText Documentum
There are numerous other products available including SharePoint, Stellent, FileNet, etc. Most offer many of the same solutions and modules that Documentum provides, however some, such as SharePoint, still have significant shortcomings when it comes to true, enterprise-level …
Chose OpenText Documentum
Robustness of Documentum is far better than SharePoint.
Features
MediawideOpenText Documentum
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Mediawide
-
Ratings
OpenText Documentum
9.2
Ratings
14% above category average
Content capture & imaging00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Document management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Records management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Automated workflows00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Mobile support00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Integration00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
MediawideOpenText Documentum
Small Businesses
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MediawideOpenText Documentum
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
MediawideOpenText Documentum
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well suited for designing brand-compliant billboards, storefront signs, in-store signs, and wall signs to draw attention to your brand and drive foot traffic to your store As I already told you earlier, they can work on printing stationery and business cards.
Read full review
What are the document volume, the throughput - currently and expected in year, 3 years etc.? Is the company doing content management on international level, where access from multiple locations is needed - then Documentum can be good investment. What ECM system will be used for - document storage, document lifecycle or retention? Or all of the above? - Documentum works very well if all 3 items are combined, yet for storage there must be cheaper and more easily adaptable solutions available.
Read full review
Pros
  • It can merge data and videos to deliver an exceptionally engaging experience to the receiver.
  • It is also useful in addressing the customer by the first name at the outset, delivering a relevant message to him and if need be, engaging him with a unique story
  • There is a feature that conducts surveys, customer profiling or includes a call to action buttons in HTML5 videos to increase and optimize interaction with the consumer.
Read full review
  • It's good at integration with external systems through standard industry supported APIs, including but not limited to web services integration and file system integration.
  • Good support from major up and downstream technologies such as image capturing and back end ERP, Database, and HR.
  • Highly configurable.
  • Very fast searching capabilities.
  • Highly scalable.
Read full review
Cons
  • I still feel that they can do more in the Business Card design part.
  • They can also put more work in printing stationary.
  • Everything else is good and I love the product.
Read full review
  • Expense. If Documentum costs less it would penetrate more markets. This is often the reason a lighter weight solution is chosen.
  • Web Publishing. Documentum is not a great solution for replacing CMSs like SiteCore or Drupal. Probably better as an archiving target for parallel publishing to both web and Documentum. Documentum is also not a web hosting solution like some other systems, it is possible to try and consume directly from the repository in real time but it is better to push web content out and consume from another platform.
  • Development. The price of broad functionality is complexity. Arguably, Documentum drank the kool-aid and tried to become like other enterprise solutions by adapting Java, Windows, etc. in the late '90s and it made them slower, more complex in design, and less stable. They recovered from that but it still requires developers with a few years of experience in Documentum to safely develop in Documentum. The issue is not knowing Java but knowing what to do or not do in an ECM system. This is even more important in regulated ECM/RM systems.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Stability is a key factor as well as its flexibility. Also, any organization that deploys Documentum will have made a significant investment in terms of time and money, so not renewing its commitment can come with a significant cost. That said, the decision to deploy Documentum initially should come only after extensive evaluation, knowing that once deployed it will likely remain the platform of choice.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Support is better than with ECM, but could use some improvement.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Subjective but here's how I see it: Heavy duty (in order of how much they can do and how much they can handle): 1)Documentum, 2)FileNet 3)OpenText Middle duty: 1)WCC-WebCenter Content, 2)Alfresco, 3)M-Files (3rd b/c it is Windows only), 4)Nuxeo (only b/c of its newish approach that may lead somewhere) Light duty: 1) BOX (not an ECM but it says it is), 2) EFSS (pick your poison, BOX is an enhanced EFSS), 3) CMSs (some have some ECM capability, none have much)
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Very good ROI, I would say personally, as when I went to local vendors, they were charging a lot, and Mediawide is a cost-effective option.
Read full review
  • After this product, the client is able to manage content security and due to it, the client is able to use the business process, and this really reduces effort and increases the profit in business.
  • It provides integration with SAP easily which really helps the client to manage this effectively and with minimum effort system is ready to use.
  • Also searching, automated flows also create a bigger impact and reduce a lot manual effort.
Read full review
ScreenShots