Medrio vs. Zelta

Medrio is very user friendly and even allows the user to print out the eCRFs to be used as source documents. This makes creating source documents very easy for the Research team and the information directly matches the EDC, which makes the monitoring process go much smoother. The process for withdrawing a subject can be a bit confusing, as the system only allows for a "screen-failure" designation and not an option for withdrawal, or is lost to follow-up.

Incentivized

Zelta is a good tool for companies currently utilizing multiple software platforms to create and monitor clinical trial information. Due to the price, it is best suited for large pharmaceutical manufacturers with active pipelines and high R&D spend. Zelta's value is more limited to smaller, more focused companies.

Incentivized

• Ease of navigation for entering subject data.
• Very organized placement of eCRFs.
• Allows for accurate and efficient data collection.

Incentivized

• It is highly customizable and easy to program.
• There is a wide variety of data that can be collected from IRB/site information to clinical data.
• Zelta provides comprehensive edit language to program for accurate results.
• Page dynamics are very useful when including or hiding certain data questions.

Incentivized

• The system does not allow a separate designation for screen failures that were lost to follow-up or who were withdrawn by the PI.
• When a subject is deemed a screen-failure, eCRFs are still expected to be filled out and it is unclear which ones unless otherwise directed by the in-house team.

Incentivized

• Would like to have more access to report review. Most of the functions are controlled by the initial data management setup of the specific reports. I would like to be able to run my own custom programs as a CRA (some way to bypass internal programming).
• Sites note that they are limited in pulling tables (with specific information ) based on internal programming. I only see what DM has allowed with the CVS/EXCEL tables.
• Better user guide to assist with training.

Incentivized

We are satisfied from our experience with Zelta by Merative, the close collaboration we have with the Zelta team is also something we value. We plan to use Zelta for a long time

Incentivized

It is easy to use, it helps us to be more productive, work better with teams anywhere they are, especially during the pandemic it was really helpful, it is easier to find data, to organize data, improving our findings, reducing time significantly, and more importantly been able to help in better ways our patients.

Incentivized

available when needed

Incentivized

some audit reports are difficult to download and take time subject pdf also takes some time to download

Incentivized

I have not had any technical issues with this product in the two years I've used it, which speaks for itself. I like how I am now able to use my email address to sign in instead of remembering yet another user name, this makes using this EDC a much more enjoyable experience.

Incentivized

Our organization has been using both Zelta and in-house applications. The main considerations on which one to use for a particular study is time to get the databases running, cost, and ease of use. For some studies, the time and cost of using Zelta are negative factors, and an in-house system is selected.

very efficient self training

Incentivized

again not sure about it, I wasn't part of our organization yet

Incentivized

Zelta is as good or better than Rave. I believe that Zelta has a more friendly user interface and is easier to navigate on the designer and Site side. CRF build and study build in general appears to be easier and Zelta can be used for almost any kind of clinical study that Rave can be used for.

Incentivized

• Monitoring visits run much smoother due to the fact that eCRFs can be directly printed from the EDC.
• Information requested in the EDC is clear and concise and easy to understand.

Incentivized

• Time Saving - We could deliver a fully functional eCRF within the record time of 15 days.
• Cost Saving - Reduces the overall turn around time thus eventually helping stay within the budget.
• Prompt customer support team thus helping in before time resolution of issues.

Incentivized