memoQ vs. Trint

memoQ

memoQ

21 Reviews and Ratings

Trint

Trint

6 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
memoQ	Score 6.1 out of 10	N/A	memoQ is a translation technology from the company of the same name headquartered in Budapest, boasting an emphasis on quality, innovation and customer satisfaction.	N/A
Trint	Score 8.0 out of 10	N/A	Trint uses artificial intelligence to power its web-based automated transcription platform. Audio and video files are uploaded to Trint’s online software and then transcribed using automated speech recognition. The Trint Editor is the marriage of a text editor to an audio/video player: the transcribed text is “stitched” to the audio or video file, making it simple to search, verify and edit the machine-generated transcripts. Users can instantly time the length of their soundbites. They can…	$80 per month per seat

Pricing

memoQ

Trint

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Starter: $80
per month per seat
Advanced: $100
per month per seat
Enterprise: Custom Pricing

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
memoQ	Trint
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

$15 hour

Additional Details

—

Up to a 40% discount for annual pricing.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	memoQ	Trint
Considered Both Products	memoQ Daniela Coelho Professional Linguist Chose memoQ MemoQ is useful in its own ways. It was the first CAT tool I have ever used, so my proficiency is higher in this regard. The QA process seems to be lighter and smoother, allowing for a fast review of the work in question, with a good and trusting spellcheck feature. Incentivized Helpful? WP Wim Peys Project Manager Chose memoQ I believe memoQ is the best of these 3 tools. It has soo much functionality. I wish I could use it for all my projects, but we have a lot of clients that want to use either Memsource or SDL Trados Studio. As for the Web Editor, our translators seem to prefer Memsource over … Incentivized Helpful? Saraj Noori Localization Project Manager II Chose memoQ I like MemoQ because there is a good amount of choices of service and engineering support. Memsource accepts lots of different file types as a source file. Like Memsource and Trados, you can install different connectors to your CMS and process your files smoothly. I would … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose memoQ We are using memoQ for only certain projects and it’s not our main tool. It’s relatively slow and sometimes it can get too complicated. It does the job in the end but we prefer Memsource because of its easy-to-use interface as time is very important for us as project managers. Incentivized Helpful?	Trint No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
	memoQ	Trint
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic	Dragon Speech Recognition Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	No answers on this topic	Dovetail Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises	No answers on this topic	Verint Speech and Text Analytics Score 8.4 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	memoQ	Trint
Likelihood to Recommend	8.0 (0 ratings)	9.5 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	memoQ	Trint
Likelihood to Recommend	MemoQ is especially useful when working in tandem with established translation agencies. The network access is one of the best and allows users to collaborate in projects easily. I would recommend memoQ in that manner, as I have always found it very intuitive and easy to use. All functionalities provided are a must for translators in the industry. Incentivized Daniela Coelho Professional Linguist Read full review	It consequently translates sound from all record designs and produces a shareable and editable transcript. The interface of Trint is decent and works really hard in interpreting the content. It can also be used when taking an interview of an individual from a different language background. Here and there the record of certain dialects contains botches which are then rectified by the actual persons. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Online projects feature Detailed customization such as project templates Various export options such as plain, XLIFF, RTF, etc. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	More accurate than those of a live agent because Trint uses Artificial Intelligence. Speed is high of transcribing. You're ready to tap on the part you need to change, pay attention to it and fix. This is an amazing apparatus. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Selection of multiple segments is not possible (you can select multiple segments that are following each other by holding down the shift key but not randomly selected segments by holding the Ctrl key or so). Make it easier to use filter configurations of a file already used in a project when adding a new file of the same type. Incentivized WP Wim Peys Project Manager Read full review	Some languages transcribe need improvement Web interface need to improve as well Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	I believe memoQ is the best of these 3 tools. It has soo much functionality. I wish I could use it for all my projects, but we have a lot of clients that want to use either Memsource or SDL Trados Studio. As for the Web Editor, our translators seem to prefer Memsource over memoQ, so this might be something memoQ can improve in the future. Incentivized WP Wim Peys Project Manager Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Sales improved. Production rate is growing. Linguists are happy. Incentivized Saraj Noori Localization Project Manager II Read full review	Save time and money Quick results help us to focus on different work Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots		Trint Screenshots