MetaCompliance vs. SAI360

MetaCompliance is well suited to be managed by a small IT team. It is also well suited for companies that need to provide their employees with security awareness training. It has the added benefits for companies that may not have a formal policy approval process, MetaCompliance's policy management modules will help there. Lastly, the capabilities of the phishing simulation could be used by any organization that does not have a program in place for phishing.

Incentivized

The usage of ROAM, as well as the integration of external programmes through API and import functions, has almost reduced duplication of work. One thing to keep in mind is that your use cases must be very clear. There are a lot of SAI solutions, and their titles don't always correspond to what they actually perform.

Incentivized

• Customized unified design platform
• Modules that fit your organization
• Low technology involvement with information department.
• Built on foundational platforms some bidirectional in the ERM framework with TPRM contracts
• Single sign-on web-based applications

Incentivized

• Reporting
• Legacy modules (i.e. tasks)
• Look and feel
• Intuitive UI

Overall it is a very versatile system that does help to keep our processes automated and secure. We are able to streamline our day to day activities.

Incentivized

This system is compatible and compares to others in the marketplace.

Incentivized

• We are finding our employees are much better able to identify malicious emails
• Less time spent on IT developing, delivering, and maintaining security awareness training
• Overall has lead to an increase in Security within the organization

Incentivized

• Less administration for risk assessments allowing for quarterly control assessments
• 100% removal of IT effort in our annual conflicts of interest assessments
• Reduction of manual processes
• Consolidation of legacy systems into SAI360