Metasploit vs. Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Metasploit
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Metasploit is open source network security software described by Rapid7 as the world’s most used penetration testing framework, designed to help security teams do more than just verify vulnerabilities, manage security assessments, and improve security awareness.N/A
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is an automated, all-in-one mobile application (Android/iOS/Windows) pen-testing, malware analysis and security assessment framework capable of performing static and dynamic analysis. MobSF support mobile app binaries (APK, IPA & APPX) along with zipped source code and provides REST APIs for integration with CI/CD or DevSecOps pipeline. The Dynamic Analyzer helps you to perform runtime security assessment and interactive instrumented testing.N/A
Pricing
MetasploitMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MetasploitMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
MetasploitMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Considered Both Products
Metasploit
Chose Metasploit
Acunetix vulnerability scanner, Netsparker, SQLMap
Chose Metasploit
You can configure and develop your own versions of exploits that are suitable for your business. The free version is very useful and the Rapid7 website has a lot of info to help you understand the exploits. Nessus just lets you identify the vulnerabilities but Metasploit lets …
Chose Metasploit
Metasploit is an all around good suite of tools to test and validate potential vulnerabilites. Other tools have bits and pecies such as NMAP, Nessus, Burp Suite, etc. but Metasploit can function in the same way but more.
Chose Metasploit
Metasploit is the most well-known tool in the average pen tester's toolkit. It's hard to compare to its neighbor's due to its size and following.
Chose Metasploit
They are equal in my mind. It really just depends on a user's preference. Cobalt Strike is essential a graphical user interface (GUI) built on top of Metasploit, so it will feel very familiar to Metasploit users. The Pentestly Framework is also quite similar to Metasploit. …
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Chose Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)
In my opinion, MobSF is not as comprehensive as SonarQube. Both, however, do a very good job in scanning your code for vulnerabilities. Both do roughly the same things. The reports of SonarQube are more detailed though. The advantage that MobSF has over SonarQube is the price. …
Best Alternatives
MetasploitMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MetasploitMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
MetasploitMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Likelihood to Recommend
In security of information it's vital to think like a hacker and it's important to know the tools they use for attacks. So this software gives you the exploits that are already in the wild and to the access of everyone. That's very dangerous so you have to be aware of it.
Read full review
MobSF is good for checking for vulnerabilities in your app. It will also give suggestions on how to address them. Another thing is can do is find code that may be incorrect. It is not, however, a substitute for a system that actually checks your code for proper use. It really is concentrated on security.
Read full review
Pros
  • Scanning our network for new or existing vulnerable systems.
  • Automation of manual tests and exploits to allow what used to be days of effort to be squeezed into hours.
  • Metasploit has become an integral part in our validation of new systems before their inclusion in our production network.
Read full review
  • Scan for vulnerabilities
  • Scan for bad coding
  • Give suggestions on fixes for security issues
Read full review
Cons
  • If Metasploit could support payloads written in languages other than Ruby, that would be amazing and could help draw in a larger set of contributors.
Read full review
  • The UI is not that user friendly
  • The documentation could be easier to understand
  • An easier method of deploying MobSF would be appreciated
Read full review
Support Rating
We don't use it.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Acunetix vulnerability scanner, Netsparker, SQLMap
Read full review
In my opinion, MobSF is not as comprehensive as SonarQube. Both, however, do a very good job in scanning your code for vulnerabilities. Both do roughly the same things. The reports of SonarQube are more detailed though. The advantage that MobSF has over SonarQube is the price. One is free while the other is a paid solution (with several tiers). However, we use them together to get a more comprehensive scan.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We have been able to weed out false positives with a more manual vetting of scanned vulnerabilities.
  • Our teams have become more well versed in penetration testing with Metasploit to understand the vulnerabilities potentially present.
Read full review
  • It has allowed our apps to pass a security vetting requirement of a third party to deploy our app
  • We can see where we can improve on the development of our app
  • The deployment can take a while, especially with teams not familiar with the software
Read full review
ScreenShots