TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Microsoft 365 vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft 365

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft 365 (formerly Office 365) is a Microsoft Cloud subscription service that includes Microsoft Office products (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, OneNote, Outlook, Publisher, and Access). The software can be installed across multiple devices and ensures that users always have the most up-to-date version of the included Office applications.

    $5

    Per User Per Month

    Mimecast Advanced Email Security

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AThe Mimecast Secure Email Gateway is a messaging security option with anti-spam / anti-malware, data loss prevention, large file send, and other features, from UK company Mimecast.N/A
    Pricing
    Microsoft 365Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    Editions & Modules
    Business Basic
    $5.00
    Per User Per Month
    Individual
    $5.84
    *Per Month
    Business - Apps
    $8.25
    Per User Per Month
    Enterprise - F3
    $10.00
    Per User Per Month
    Business Standard
    $12.50
    Per User Per Month
    Business Premium
    $20.00
    Per User Per Month
    Enterprise - E3
    $32.00
    Per User Per Month
    Enterprise - E5
    $57.00
    Per User Per Month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft 365Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details*When billed annually.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Microsoft 365Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Mimecast
    Chose Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    Proofpoint ATP offered strong threat detection and forensics, but it was more complex to manage and significantly more expensive. Microsoft 365 Defender had solid native integration with M365, but its filtering and impersonation protection weren’t as strong out of the box, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    Less customizable than Mimecast Advanced Email Security. Less policy options
    Incentivized
    Chose Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    I have never really used Mimecast or Sophos, which was an on-prem mail filtering tool - Now use 365 Defender services alongside Mimecast.
    Incentivized
    Chose Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    Mimecast Advanced Email Security had a reputation in the industry we went with, and the price was very competitive at the time.
    Incentivized
    Chose Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    The reason we went with Mimecast over other products was for the partnership. We heard from our businesses who utilize Mimecast of their great partnerships and relationships they build with their customers. We meet with our representative quarterly to discuss any trends in the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    At the time, Mimecast was the leading industry standard, and we needed a better solution, so it was only natural. After checking out our options, I chose the tool that worked for me the best. Mimecast gave me a platform that did everything i was already working on via one …
    Incentivized
    Chose Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    We were longtime customers of Proofpoint before moving to Mimecast Advanced Email Security. In my opinion, the support and product usability is heads and shoulders above what Proofpoint offered us, at a similar pricepoint no less.
    Incentivized
    Chose Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    We most seriously looked at Proofpoint, and just felt like Mimecast Advanced Email Security has a slightly better bang for the buck.
    Incentivized
    Chose Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    Mimecast Advanced Email Security at the time, seems to be the most stable, reliable, cloud-based MTA spam filter that integrated with SSO and ticks all of our security and compliance boxes.
    Incentivized
    Chose Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    We selected Mimecast based on its features, cost and ease of use. We were also recommended to use Mimecast by other professionals in our industry, and based on the reviews we found doing our product research. Mimecast has performed well and has exceeded our expectations. We are …
    Incentivized
    Chose Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    Mimecast Advanced Email Security is very competitive with Microsoft's email solution. In my opinion, Mimecast is superior as far as ease of use and the layout of the user interface. For Microsoft's product you tend to have to go down the rabbit hole to find something. With …
    Incentivized
    Chose Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    It is a very powerful and focused offering.
    Incentivized
    Chose Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    Mimecast Advanced Email Security is better than our previously used product in term of features and usability. Mimecast Advanced Email Security has a lot of good points. The email gateway policies provided by Mimecast Advanced Email Security is larger than others and has a lot …
    Incentivized
    Chose Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    For features price , speed , accuracy
    Incentivized
    Chose Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    Mimecast is the most mature email security platform I've ever used in my nine years in industry and across MSPs, other work 'well enough' but the configurability of Mimecast is where it shines - it can be *exactly* how I want it to be. Given we work in a highly regulated …
    Incentivized
    Chose Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    Interface is easier to use
    More reliable, and quicker email deliverability
    Incentivized
    Chose Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    MTA based product that works regardless of which front end mail app you use with and O365 backend.
    Incentivized
    Chose Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    Mimecast Secure Email Gateway has a bit more features to use with its out of the box service.
    Incentivized
    Chose Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    We were previously using Tumbleweed to manage SPAM and it was not as effective as Mimecast - we had it deployed in addition to Mimecast and mimecast caught much more SPAM that Tumbleweed had marked as safe
    Incentivized
    Chose Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    Barracuda - We've previously used barracuda and this has been much more powerful of a product with much more granularity. We also considered IronPort and Trustpoint
    Incentivized
    Chose Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    Mimecast is as effective as Proofpoint, but cheaper. The built-in Office 365 email security features are good but offer less control.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Microsoft 365Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    Secure Email Gateway
    Comparison of Secure Email Gateway features of Microsoft 365 and Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    Feature
    Microsoft 365
    -
    Ratings
    Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    8.0
    67 Ratings
    Anti-malware00 Ratings8.565 Ratings
    Customizability00 Ratings8.566 Ratings
    Data Loss Protection00 Ratings6.655 Ratings
    Threat Detection00 Ratings8.463 Ratings
    Sandboxing00 Ratings8.058 Ratings
    End-to-End Encryption00 Ratings8.555 Ratings
    Management Tools00 Ratings7.764 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Microsoft 365Mimecast Advanced Email Security
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.8
    (240 ratings)
    8.5
    (79 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.5
    (6 ratings)
    8.7
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    7.2
    (8 ratings)
    8.2
    (54 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.9
    (54 ratings)
    6.0
    (7 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.8
    (28 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Professional Services
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)