Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs. Skyhigh Cloud Access Security Broker

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps (formerly Microsoft Cloud App Security) is a multimode cloud access security broker.N/A
Skyhigh Cloud Access Security Broker
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Skyhigh Cloud Access Security Broker (formerly McAfee MVISION Cloud) is a cloud access security broker (CASB) that protects data and stops threats in the cloud across SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS from a single, cloud-native enforcement point.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Cloud AppsSkyhigh Cloud Access Security Broker
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Defender for Cloud AppsSkyhigh Cloud Access Security Broker
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Defender for Cloud AppsSkyhigh Cloud Access Security Broker
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps was chosen primarily due to its ability to work perfectly within our mostly M365 environment. Given that this was an added feature of our E5 license, we chose to dive into it and use it due to it's good visibility into user actions and the …
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps acts as an additional security layer for all SaaS applications our organizations uses to do business and helps providing detailed information about this Apps that we normally use across the entire organizations on a single dashboard, enabling …
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
Netskope CASB, Broadcom CloudSOC CASB and formerly from Symantec
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
We had a past experience with Microsoft ATA, one of the engines that Cloud App Security now uses to provide insights on internal threats, Microsoft ATA was discontinued and all of its features became part of the Microsoft Defender suite, surely, Cloud App Security and the …
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
Microsoft Cloud App Security is more professional than Google 360. It helped organize documents better and staff [was] more willing to integrate it into their daily routines. Microsoft offered more options for organizations and it made more sense the way their application was …
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
More flexible and more features with easy integration with cloud services like Microsoft Azure and other cloud services. Overall both gives similar features but we prefer Microsoft cloud app security due to its high threat detection rate. mostly we have been able to stop the …
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
We did not evaluate other tools, as our main driver was Defender ATP and MCAS came included
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
I would go for MS because we leverage Azure in our organization and that helps.
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
MCAS works well for our particular needs in the DLP, Data Protection, cloud discovery and Threat Detection spaces; most of these tools can accomplish the same tasks and also do enforcements with a forward proxy solution - MCAS does not offer that and if you need it you will …
Chose Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
Many of the competitors who started in the CASB space have expanded into the SASE category. If organizations do not need the additional controls provided by a SASE solution, then Defender for Cloud Apps is pretty good. If an organization needs a true SASE solution, you would be …
Skyhigh Cloud Access Security Broker
Chose Skyhigh Cloud Access Security Broker
McAfee is definitely the best in the market. Their security services are vast and highly competent. I personally love the encryption feature.
Chose Skyhigh Cloud Access Security Broker
It integrates great with third-party software. so part of our company's choosing this depends on the great and smooth integration it provides. except previous software were not good and We have to hire an expert to deal with this particular software cause it was hard to …
Chose Skyhigh Cloud Access Security Broker
Skyhigh is one of the leading CASB on the market because it has a cool User interface where it is easy for a normal user who cannot read raw logs to easily understand the issue by the UI and perform remediation steps. The way it provides security to customer data is …
Chose Skyhigh Cloud Access Security Broker
We felt like when we looked at at Netskope, Skyhigh had the most complete vision. They also have custom apps which I am not aware of other services being able to do
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud AppsSkyhigh Cloud Access Security Broker
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Avanan
Avanan
Score 9.4 out of 10
Avanan
Avanan
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Avanan
Avanan
Score 9.4 out of 10
Avanan
Avanan
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Defender for Cloud AppsSkyhigh Cloud Access Security Broker
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Defender for Cloud AppsSkyhigh Cloud Access Security Broker
Likelihood to Recommend
The feature that helps us in detecting the sensitive information being shared has been very useful. In addition, the feature that allows [Microsoft Cloud App Security] to apply policies with SharePoint, Teams, and OneDrive is being used predominantly. It is a kind of unified solution. As compared to other solutions such as Netskope, Symantec, or McAfee, it provides a more unified reporting structure. It also integrates with other technologies. We have Azure Information Protection, and it goes well with the solutions that we are already using.
Read full review
It is well suited for almost every organization [that] deals with sensitive data or [their] users have to perform certain sensitive actions that can go [into] financial loss if somehow there are attacked by [viruses] or malicious links. To prevent that a company must have certain apps prevent these and MVISION is [one] of them. so I recommend it.
Read full review
Pros
  • Integrates with Microsoft Products
  • Has a fair share of popular SasS connectors
  • Is constantly releasing new connectors for new SaaS platforms
Read full review
  • Great visibility into cloud apps
  • Understanding of unsanctioned services
  • Control of sanctioned services
Read full review
Cons
  • Cloud discovery throws away found services not found in the MCAS database of SaaS apps.
  • Many panes of glass required for a fully enabled implementation to administer, configure and utilize 100% of the product.
  • Room for improvement in the reporting realm - not enough records are visible and exportable for high record count policy reports.
Read full review
  • The interface is a tad complicated, especially for a beginner
  • There are bugs that need to be addressed
  • Can be really slow
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Skyhigh is a leading CASB helps in identifying the bad services and protecting user data with a detokenization feature and also with the anomalies triggering alarms to customers for any suspicious activities. It provides users by providing blocking script to block service on the proxy or firewall and also shows the abilities to the user to balance the weight of risk service.
Read full review
Usability
The interface is pretty simple and easy to use; however, you will need to do a lot of investigative research on your own to get comfortable with it. Originally, many of the Microsoft security tools had their own seperate consoles. Overtime, they have blended into one interface which is the ideal state. In some cases it is clear Microsoft had to pick which console a certain feature or setting was going to reside in and this leads to some confusion. For example, DLP is managed through Defender for Cloud Apps but you will also need to jump into Purview. For things like reverse proxy on your M365 tenant, you will need to go into Azure and setup conditional access rules. Not a big problem and I can understand why the settings are located where they are but for someone just starting out with Defender for Cloud Apps, it will take some time to figure out.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I have not utilized actual support but the Sales and Product teams have been super helpful in moving our implementation forward and showing us the best practices.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
More flexible and more features with easy integration with cloud services like Microsoft Azure and other cloud services. Overall both gives similar features but we prefer Microsoft cloud app security due to its high threat detection rate. mostly we have been able to stop the threat in very very less time.
Read full review
McAfee is definitely the best in the market. Their security services are vast and highly competent. I personally love the encryption feature.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Cloud App Security saves us thousands of dollars finding and rectifying apps security issues
  • Identity Security Posture helps the organization identity stay in shape, saving thousands of dollars on security consultations
  • The cost of suffering a breach cannot be quantified, CAS helps minimize the chances of the attackers succeeding, with excellent historical logging for most operations
Read full review
  • Reduction of high risks.
  • Allowed to set up policies.
Read full review
ScreenShots