Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs. Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Score 6.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (formerly Dynamics NAV) is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family. The technology is based on the Navision product acquired by Microsoft in 2002. This product is the best-selling Microsoft ERP platform, and is often used by companies in the manufacturing and distribution verticals.
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Finance and Operations (or Dynamics AX) was an ERP product in the Dynamics family. It has been split into separate Dynamics 365 products and is no longer available.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralMicrosoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
Dynamics 365 Business Central Team Members
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
Dynamics 365 Business Central Essentials
$70
per month (billed annually) per user
Dynamics 365 Business Central Premium
$100
per month (billed annually) per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralMicrosoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralMicrosoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Used to work on Dynamics AX, an ERP solution which is now discontinued
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is more robust and extensible than NetSuite. NetSuite wins out on visual presentation and user based reporting flexibility. Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central wins out on integration and financial integration as well as power of …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
I think from an overall easy to use ERP that has many modules to help manage the business from client side to back office with accounting and finances MS Dynamics BC is one of the better solutions I've used. It seems to be more robust in features yet intuitive and easy for …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
As compared to others Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is more advanced in terms of features and tools available along. In terms of pricing it gives a fight with the competition. Make it the ideal choice as its easy to use and for streamlining operations across multiple …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Dynamics fits the modern world, integrating new technology to ensure a complete business process is readily accessible in a rapidly moving world of "in-office" and "remote" work. It solves the need for several departments and streamlines procurement, warehouse, and finance …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
We use Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central with Avatax and they work well but again I think changes are very difficult to make.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Really easy to use, user friendly. Its Reliable, when it goes wrong it’s usually easy to fix as the error message tells you what it is. The system looks nice and easy for non financial people to use. The new features with pivot tables is a great addition and the analytical …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
BC is MUCH easer to setup and to use. The support offering for BC is much better.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
We looked at both Quickbooks and Multiview, and ultimately felt that Quickbooks was too limiting for our growth, while Multiview met our needs but didn't offer quite as much ease-of-use as Business Central. I believe it was the dashboarding, reporting, and single-sign-on …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Microsoft Dynamics GP feels a bit more user friendly and intuitive than NAV. However, NAV will definitely win the gold on the ability to integrate and connect with other software and technologies, especially as the company grows. We are having a tougher time training employees …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
There was a third party that collected company ERP requirements from people representing all functional areas to narrow down the field of ERP offerings. The top two options presented were Epicor and NAV. Company management and IT preferred that the ERP system be hosted on a …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
MS Dynamics NAV is a powerful tool in terms of functionality as it provides financial management, supply chain, project management, service, and CRM capabilities. It has a very reasonable price compared to the other tools that are well overpriced. It also provides several …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
I selected Microsoft Dynamics NAV since it is easy to install and setup. Also, the slick design and straightforward interface is what keeps my corporation growing. Lastly, Microsoft Dynamics NAV has all the features for the capability of inventory planning, invoicing among …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Dynamics NAV stacks up well against Infor ERP with its ease of use and the functionality much like other Microsoft products. Dynamics has a lot more options for customization of the software when compared to other products. Dynamics NAV also is reasonably priced when looking at …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
The only other system that we've deployed within our organization in the past is Great Lakes Accounting Software. Some of our users preferred this software over the Microsoft Dynamics NAV because they said it was easier to use. I personally prefer Microsoft Dynamics because …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
I have personally supported all of the Dynamic family of ERP systems and made the decision to concentrate on NAV as the solution of choice. From a support and development standpoint there are few if any packages that can compare. It is not uncommon for most of the companies …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Navision is more flexible tan SAP and also easier to configure and use. It also allows you the possibilty to integrate easily your ERP database tables witho other products.
Comparing it aginst Oracle eBusiness Suite, Navision is clearly cheaper and easier to maintain since it …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Dynamics NAV blows the doors off of Accpac in breadth, scalability and performance. If you're looking for full functionality for a small to medium sized business that can scale as you grow with solid performance and data integrity, then Dynamics NAV is the right solution for …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
I have used Microsoft AX, and also JDEdwards and PeopleSoft.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
We chose NAV over JD Edwards 10 years ago because it was able to better handle the customizations that were needed in order for us to do our business. The ability to customize has been helpful, but it needs to be controlled.
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Chose Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Using this Microsoft platform is the similarity of the structure and appearance of the software and their integration and easy integration with each other, which makes the work easier for users and employees of the company.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Dynamics AX is one of the most advanced ERPs out there. When your business needs grow, many other smaller ERPs struggle to cover them.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Microsoft D365 FO stands out amongst the competitors with its strong backing on the Microsoft Azure cloud and the life cycle services is the best I’ve seen. There is a ways to go in making it low/no code and mobile is there but not great. Overall an ok product as ERP is a …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Cost and local regional compliance were primary factors in chosing Microsoft Dynamics AX over SAP Access Control for our need. SAP AC would have provided easier integration into our primary ERP system SAP but there were some regional compliance with ASEAN countries as well as …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
I found a smaller cost in AX and higher flexibility in process definition and in features customization
Chose Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
I was not part of the decision making process to select Microsoft Dynamics AX, however, I do know that an exhaustive search was done and many options were considered alongside Microsoft Dynamics AX and I feel that the right decision was made in choosing this solution.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)

Microsoft Dynamics AX is more user friendly compared to our old ERP system.

With the growth of the company, the old way to generate from the old ERP system is too slow and not competent enough.

We need to get the data as fast as possible.

Chose Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Not as user-friendly and takes more time to input invoices but gets slightly faster as you get used to their quirks.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
In all cases Dynamics proved to be a more affordable overall investment compared to Oracle and SAP as well as a less complicated implementation.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)

SAP--there is no way to compare these as SAP is large and complicated as it is not a single integrated system - but many system underneath the GUI / Cover of SAP. No process flexibility that is so needed in our competitive world where global competition requires change at a …

Chose Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Customization capabilities are far more beneficial than a rigid product like SAP.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Oracle business suite 11i. DAX is simpler and easier to install and customize.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Oracle. Cost and mitigation of single platform risk, as we also use Oracle for Finance, Order Mgt, etc.
Features
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralMicrosoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
4.0
Ratings
57% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
Ratings
20% above category average
Pay calculation2.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration2.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files2.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
5.8
Ratings
27% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.0
Ratings
8% below category average
API for custom integration5.80 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Plug-ins5.80 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.7
Ratings
6% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
6.0
Ratings
31% below category average
Single sign-on capability7.40 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions10.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
5.2
Ratings
33% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.3
Ratings
14% above category average
Dashboards4.90 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Standard reports5.80 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Custom reports4.90 Ratings9.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.7
Ratings
0% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.2
Ratings
6% above category average
Accounts payable7.40 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable6.90 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support5.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers5.80 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations6.30 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting5.80 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Standardized Processes5.80 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
5.9
Ratings
29% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
Ratings
10% above category average
Inventory tracking5.80 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering5.80 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Location management2.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
4.7
Ratings
50% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
Pricing2.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Order entry5.80 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Credit card processing2.00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold2.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Order Orchestration6.30 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.4
Ratings
1% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
Ratings
15% above category average
Billing Management6.30 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management6.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management5.80 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting5.80 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Period Close5.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.7
Ratings
13% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.9
Ratings
16% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Project Costing10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Cost Capture10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Capital Project Management8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition8.00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
6.2
Ratings
10% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
Ratings
25% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling2.00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers2.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality2.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools2.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
9.7
Ratings
27% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
Ratings
16% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
6.9
Ratings
1% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
Ratings
23% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared2.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Contract Authoring2.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Contract Repository2.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated5.80 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Supplier Management5.80 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.3
Ratings
11% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
Ratings
30% above category average
Risk Repository5.30 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Control Management4.90 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments5.80 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Issue Detection5.30 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification5.30 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
5.4
Ratings
21% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.5
Ratings
24% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization2.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management2.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management2.00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Fulfillment Management1.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management2.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
4.5
Ratings
49% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.7
Ratings
4% above category average
Production Process Design2.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Production Management2.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Configuration Management2.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Work Execution2.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs2.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
3.5
Ratings
68% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
9.2
Ratings
26% above category average
Forecasting1.00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Inventory Planning2.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring2.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.3
Ratings
2% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
9.0
Ratings
23% above category average
Proposal Management2.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management2.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralMicrosoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralMicrosoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
6.3
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralMicrosoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
It addresses well some integration and connectivity issues with other software and adapted technologies: formulation and manufacturing batching software, scanners and bar codes, inventory, financials, emailing of invoices and statement, sales and purchasing... etc. I believe it to be better suited to a medium to large company. Not as simple and seamless as we expected for migrating from another Microsoft Dynamics software product (we moved from GP to NAV). Our staff is going through a tougher time than we thought to learn some procedures. Normal growing pains?!
Read full review
It integrates fully with the other Microsoft software we use daily, and this coordination speeds up our work and gives us the agility to run easily. For example, in a purchase inquiry, the customer, after submitting a request, identifies the teams that should work on the project, and if they need further review by other people, they are added to the process, and everything is managed seamlessly rather than the sales process. Get the result as fast as possible.
Read full review
Pros
  • All of the Dynamics ERP systems are fully integrated with the full family of their Office products (Word, Excel, etc.) but the true power behind Dynamics-NAV is that it comes with complete access to the source code. Although most ERP packages provide some type of a development environment, it is always a third-party software package and requires an additional expense. NAV comes with full source code access and devolvement tools out-of-the-box and requires no additional purchase. The user is able to modify pages, reports and even add additional fields to the standard tables. If your company has an internal development staff you have the ability to purchase the same full development license that the VAR has, allowing you to handle all system customizations and support in-house. The sum total of this high flexibility is that you are able to make NAV conform to your business rather than you conforming to the software.
  • In addition to the available source code, NAV provides the user with an unlimited ability to modify and build within the rich environment of C/AL code. In over 20 years of modifying the NAV product I have never had a client ask for a modification or custom functionality that I was not able to provide. Add to this the fact that NAV now includes many development points that allow the user to place their custom code inside of the system without impacting the base code. This makes the upgrade process quick and easy and avoids the common occurrence of being version locked.
  • The user interface of Dynamics NAV has been well thought out and provides a very easy to learn and use package. Master records (Customer, Vendor, Items, etc.) have been laid out in a standard format. Once you learn where fields are located on one record you have learned them all. The forms (called Pages in NAV) have a very similar structure and, by design, are uncluttered and easily customized by the user without impacting the base code. This allows each user to configure the Page to the way they work, easing the learning process and speeding up daily work and data entry.
  • The NAV environment has grown to be very feature rich in the functionality offered and provides the user with almost everything they need with the purchase of the base product. Advanced features can be added if required as can a large number of third party add-ons made exclusively for the NAV environment. Additionally, user licenses are sold as concurrent and not as named. Concurrent licenses control the number of users allowed into the system at any one time meaning that anyone can be provided with the ability to log into the system. This allows the company to setup an unlimited number of users with the ability to access the system at any given time. This allows the occasional user to share a license with other users who only need to access the system to enter a small amount of data or run a few reports. This functionality is a plus for the company with a large sales staff or outside workers who only need limited access to the system. Named licenses would require that you purchase an access license for every person who needs to access the system.
Read full review
  • Pricing: Microsoft Dynamics AX gives us good flexibility in how we price our products.
  • UX: Microsoft Dynamics AX has a good user interface to put valuable information on the screen for users.
  • Inventory Management: Microsoft Dynamics AX does a great job at giving us insight into our inventory.
Read full review
Cons
  • There are not a lot of "out of the box" automation processes, for Microsoft Dynamics NAV. Different versions of NAV, have had various job scheduling functionality. However, each process that is automated, must be confirmed that it will function correctly, in an automatic mode. In our installation, most of the automation processes have been custom-developed.
  • Microsoft Dynamics NAV could have better documentation. Much of the documentation is original, from multiple versions ago. There is generally no step-by-step instructions, on performing various functions. Instead, most help is context-sensitive, obtained by pressing F1, on a particular field.
  • Older versions of Microsoft Dynamics NAV had a built-in WYSIWYG report builder, which made designing reports fairly straight-forward. Later versions (2013 and forward) rely exclusively on Visual Studio and SQL Reporting Services, which require a greater technical level of expertise, to use.
Read full review
  • Sales Ledger. Currently, the idea behind the sales ledger module is that the company prepares a sales order for another company. I would prefer the developers consider the scenario where a sales order is prepared for the same company but for another branch or unit.
  • Postings of issues items are currently possible but none of the modules caters to "departmental material or item request". Further tweaks have been done on our Project Module to cater for this but it's not entirely perfect. This will enable aid in cost allocation per departmental request of materials or items.
  • Challenges with the bank module - does not allow for easily reconciliation as the statement from the banks can not be uploaded except for specific format.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We've already decided to continue using this software. It is too expensive for us to upgrade so we made a workaround by using the virtual computer with Windows XP installed on it. We did research replacing this software, but it was a better financial decision to keep what we had instead
Read full review
Microsoft Dynamics continues to evolve by bringing more functionality to the customer. Also there are several independent software providers that offer a wide range of solutions for vertical markets.
Read full review
Usability
Best in terms of reporting or coming up with a great dashboard. Seamlessly collaborated with teams without depending on particular device as its web version is the buddy for people with work flexibility. Licensing price and integrations can be the areas of improvement and can simplify the interface which will be easy for a new user.
Read full review
Overall the product does what we need it to do in order for us to function as a company. While there are some concerns over ongoing costs, the belief is, once we have it fully acclimated to our business the cost should settle into alignment with our original expectations. The new features that are consistently being added do add value to the product as they are usually customer request directed.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
Read full review
Support Rating
It provides one to efficiently be able to manage bookkeeping and inventory without much challenges. One can easily navigate through workflow processes while managing usages and budgets. Being able to produce reports in Word, Excel or PDF means one is able to have a working document to produce trends and graphs or produce pivot tables.
Read full review
We use a 3rd-party Microsoft Partner for the system. They are responsive and very knowledgeable. While costs have been mentioned several times in this review they are very aware of costs and have developers who are more economical they use to help offset the level of work required to meet our changes and fix our issues.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
It took a lot of work, but Microsoft ultimately did a good job with in-person training, including being onsite in multiple global locations for extended periods.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Our solution deviated from a number of key out-of-the-box standards that were included in Online training. We just used that for introduction to the general functionality.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Some rough spots, but ultimately worked out. The contract didn't appear to be structured to support the level of overlapping facility deployments required to meet timeline commitments. Merging cultures on the program was also challenging. Overall, not an easy implementation by any stretch. Everyone did the best they could.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Dynamics fits the modern world, integrating new technology to ensure a complete business process is readily accessible in a rapidly moving world of "in-office" and "remote" work. It solves the need for several departments and streamlines procurement, warehouse, and finance processes.
Read full review
Cost and local regional compliance were primary factors in chosing Microsoft Dynamics AX over SAP Access Control for our need. SAP AC would have provided easier integration into our primary ERP system SAP but there were some regional compliance with ASEAN countries as well as the cost of implementation was more over Microsoft Dynamics AX.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Better visibility of ROI throughout each period. Orders entered, shipped, and backlogs are very visible to authorized users upon login.
  • Purchasing and inventory turns have been better realized. Out of stock parts reduced.
  • A future customer portal will enhance the customer experience by pulling NAC data into a web-based UI. However, the portal is a separate expense.
  • Time savings realized by being able to generate views or reports versus asking IT or accounting to pull a custom report.
Read full review
  • Clients have seen better cost containment on inventory based on better on hand management and supply chain visibility.
  • Faster closing process for the finance team, where by day 3 of 4 you can generate a trial balance and look to balance ledger to sub-ledger.
  • Better reporting allows for real time analysis and can get to predictive metrics in certain areas.
Read full review
ScreenShots