Microsoft Dynamics SL vs. Viewpoint Spectrum

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Score 5.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family. This product was acquired from Solomon 2000. The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.N/A
Viewpoint Spectrum
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Viewpoint Spectrum is a cloud-based construction ERP suite with project management, accounting, resource management, and reporting and analytics. Key features include workflow automation and collaboration tools, document imaging and sharing, cost estimating tools, and RFI management tools.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics SLViewpoint Spectrum
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics SLViewpoint Spectrum
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsProspective buyers may contact vendor directly for a price quote.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics SLViewpoint Spectrum
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
We started with QuickBooks Enterprise when our company was young. We quickly outgrew this program as it was not able to accommodate the financial reporting we needed to satisfy our investors. QuickBooks was also very limited in managing our revenue as we grew.
We did try Great …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
MIP is a more robust product with more comprehensive modules that is tailored toward a non-profit accounting environment. The reporting and GL analysis features on MIP is also a lot more robust than Dynamics SL and the interface within MIP is designed to tailor to user needs. …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
Different class. Microsoft Dynamics SL isn't modern in design or interface.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
Dynamics SL provides built in complex project accounting flexibility with the benefit to accommodate additional complexity with customization tools to enhance the system capabilities and fill requirement gaps either as to process, reporting, or controls.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
I have been on this product for 17 years. I have worked with Great Plains and have worked with products in the Health Care industry and believe this product pulls in all the main functionality into basic core modules and allows users to quickly grasp how to use the product. …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
They were both pretty easy to use, but I started using Microsoft Dynamics SL so it was a matter of knowing and becoming familiar with this program first. I became very accustomed to the modules and how to navigate the program.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
I have used QuickBooks when I was in college and I did enjoy it mainly because that was my first experience with an accounting product like that. I did not switch to Microsoft Dynamics; it was the product used in the first company I received a job in. Although I did not select …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
QuickBooks is not a bad solution, but it is typically used by smaller companies since it is not a true, auditable accounting system. Dynamics is much more robust than QuickBooks and handles complex accounting much better.

FinancialForce may be a good option if you are looking …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
QuickBooks is a good entry point software. Dynamics is the next logical progression in a company's growth. Dynamics SL will allow for rapid growth and provide the necessary controls that QuickBooks is lacking.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
I have evaluated many competitive products in the past. Dynamics Nav, Mass90, Dynamics GP, Platinum and others. This product is ahead in TCO and flexibility. Since the customization uses standard Microsoft tools (VBA, Visual Studio, and MS SQLServer, Object Model) it is much …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
I would love to have the Quorum product for our company; it is what the future-focused players in the industry are using.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
SL is lacking in various places for a direct sales type of company plan. Currently, we are looking into other options and have decided on Microsoft Dynamics AX as a solution. The move to AX will allow us to keep ordering in one system instead of two (right now we are forcing SL …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
We used Connectwise, which did a good job costing function, but had to be periodically integrated and lacked some reporting capability.
We looked at GP but it does not have good project accounting, so it was not a good fit for our company.
We looked at NAV but there was too much …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
We selected Dynamics SL because our business lives and dies by the success of our projects. A product that can tell you that you have a problem before you invoice, helps you get your project back on track much better. It's also much easier to evaluate across projects, tasks and …
Viewpoint Spectrum
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
The cloud-based system is great, and the ease of use compared to other systems is why we chose it.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Viewpoint Spectrum allows us to have one platform to do payroll, invoice for projects, and manage the cost of a project. Whereas Procore didn't have those features and we were using multiple other platforms to do all of those things.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Spectrum, when compared to Simply accounting, is better. It has more options, and it is easy to navigate. Spectrum meets our needs better. Spectrum, when compared to Sage 300 Construction and Real Estate, is better. Spectrum has better connectivity between its project …
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Not sure how comparable these software are. Both are great and were used for different reasons for different companies and circumstances. I use Viewpoint Spectrum for the Roadway Contruction industry and SAP for the chemical manufacturing world. There are similarities but a lot …
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Spectrum is much more comprehensive than its competitors, and provides a much deeper level of insight into project costing. From bidding to project closeout, Spectrum's software allows for cohesiveness and fluidity where other programs are very segmented and difficult to track.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Quickbooks Enterprise is much easier to use with a lot of the same more advanced features. From my experience, I wouldn't recommend Viewpoint Spectrum
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Viewpoint is much more user friendly than Sage 300, but is more limited (less customizable). It is not easy to get custom reports out of Viewpoint, whereas Sage is perfect for customization. With that comes more attention to detail in Sage, from all users, to avoid erroneous …
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Spectrum is the only one I have used since starting here 2 years ago.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Viewpoint Spectrum is much more construction based.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
I originally came off of the American Contractor when it reached its end of life, and my company converted to using Spectrum. American Contractor didn't give us half the visibility that Spectrum does - we still had to rely heavily on outside systems and processes to gain a full …
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Prior to acquisition by Viewpoint and then Trimble, the customer support was a major selling point of the software. Unfortunately at this time, that is no longer the case.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Foundation has some nice features that Spectrum doesn't and vice versa. Procore is much more complicated to use but it has better company wide reporting. I think Viewpoint will be a better choice in the long term. They are rolling out updates all the time. The cost is …
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
This is my first construction job and Spectrum is the only software I've used. The company used to use Sage
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Spectrum seems to be a better option for now since current leadership is comfortable with the financial aspect that Spectrum bring but some in the leadership team are not happy with the other offers that Trimble has.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
On my old accounting software one feature I miss is the feature where I could run a GL detail report and actually click on a line to see the actual entry.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
We selected Viewpoint Spectrum because it allowed us to run our construction and projects department along with our service department all in one application. We are into year five with Viewpoint Spectrum and are still very pleased with our decision.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
I have only evaluated the products. I chose Spectrum because it was (at the time) relatively inexpensive or on par with the others and seemed like the best option that fits our business model. It has not proven to be very costly for what we are getting in my opinion and nothing …
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Have not previously utilized any construction software. Our company has been on Viewpoint Spectrum for over 10 years.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
I wasn't part of the evaluation, but I did give input on what I thought of Viewpoint Spectrum before we bought it. I had used Timberline and Sage, before we got to Spectrum.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Spectrum is an ERP system that was built with construction in mind. It has more applicability vs. Dynamics, which is used across many types of companies.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
I investigated Sage, Timberline, ConMast, and Quickbooks some 25 years ago. Viewpoint Spectrum was the best overall in most coverage and flexibility, ease of use, and mastery. I do not have any knowledge on other software currently.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
We stayed with Spectrum for what we thought would be an easy upgrade and transition. However, we are evaluating how we are going to use ViewpointOne Teams because we've suffered many roadblocks to daily use like daily logs and uploading of photos using the app. Also, choosing …
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
We originally had Jonas Premier prior to Viewpoint based on cost and flexibility (report writing). However, we discovered that Jonas reports are not available as described in the demo. And reports were not easy to read because they had to be created. It was challenging to …
Features
Microsoft Dynamics SLViewpoint Spectrum
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.5
Ratings
17% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
5.0
Ratings
36% below category average
Pay calculation9.60 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Direct deposit files9.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
Ratings
23% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
5.3
Ratings
35% below category average
API for custom integration6.00 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Plug-ins6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.3
Ratings
11% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
8.3
Ratings
1% above category average
Single sign-on capability7.40 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Role-based user permissions7.30 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.8
Ratings
6% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
3.6
Ratings
67% below category average
Dashboards7.10 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Standard reports7.10 Ratings3.30 Ratings
Custom reports6.10 Ratings2.40 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
8.9
Ratings
14% above category average
Accounts payable7.60 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable6.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers6.60 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations7.40 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Configurable Accounting7.00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Standardized Processes7.30 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.3
Ratings
59% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
6.2
Ratings
24% below category average
Inventory tracking6.00 Ratings5.10 Ratings
Location management1.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Automatic reordering00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.7
Ratings
16% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
7.8
Ratings
1% below category average
Pricing6.00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Order entry6.00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Credit card processing7.00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Cost of goods sold7.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.8
Ratings
25% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
8.1
Ratings
8% above category average
Billing Management6.00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management7.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management5.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting6.30 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Period Close7.40 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.7
Ratings
47% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture2.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.3
Ratings
16% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
Ratings
21% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Production Management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
Ratings
17% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Inventory Planning6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Viewpoint Spectrum
6.7
Ratings
2% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Viewpoint Spectrum
7.8
Ratings
12% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics SLViewpoint Spectrum
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SLViewpoint Spectrum
Likelihood to Recommend
6.6
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.4
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
1.8
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.9
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
1.0
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.5
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
1.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
6.6
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
1.4
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics SLViewpoint Spectrum
Likelihood to Recommend
In the service series, there is a weakness in applying revenue recognition concepts which are a strong point of the project series. It is difficult to get a period sensitive WIP that could be recreated at any time for a point in time (fiscal period).
Read full review
Viewpoint Spectrum would be fine for small to medium-sized companies. It would be great for transitioning from an in-house paper-based process, especially since it's designed with small construction companies in mind. They're making it even easier for smaller companies by offering additional features that you'd normally have to find in other products. However, companies can easily outgrow this system. We have about 15 years of data in the system, over 300 active jobs, and nearly 1,500 employees. In the past 3 years we've noticed slower performance and frequent locks in the system that require intervention from a system administrator. We moved to the cloud about 2 years ago and this has made troubleshooting even more difficult as we don't have the same access that we did before to resolve performance issues.
Read full review
Pros
  • Ability to add companies, and sub-accounts on the fly allows for the growth of the system without conversions, and flexible reporting allows for the quick utilization of the data.
  • Multi-Company allows for easy and automated data entry and reporting across multiple legal entities and business segments.
  • Multi-Company also allows for easy centralization of business processes (AP check writing and Fixed Assets for example), while spreading data entry across the enterprise.
  • Ability to Copy/Paste into Dynamics SL has always been a strength- especially from Excel. The additional power of being able to use Excel for a myriad of calculations, including complex allocations, and formatting the result into a JE to paste directly into the Journal Entry Screen has saved countless hours in data-entry, and made re-use of complex items very easy.
Read full review
  • Dashboards make navigating to the crucial information quick and easy.
  • The layout with what we affectionately call the job info bar helps our project teams to quickly get where they need to go in the system.
  • Crystal reports are easily managed and integrated with Spectrum, giving us great flexibility in custom reports.
  • With a little training, and I mean a little, Spectrum is user friendly. Easy to create favorites/shortcuts for ease of use.
Read full review
Cons
  • When we have a lot of invoices rather than just a few large invoices, we can be frustrated by how long it takes Flexible Billings to generate a lot of invoices
  • It would be nice if Dynamics SL had an easy integration to some of the nicer salestax tools such as Avalara and CCH.
  • It would be nice if the fixed assets module and electronic banking were not third party.
Read full review
  • Subcontract Kiosk can be glitchy - allows subs to overbill on subcontract billing items
  • Document Imaging can be glitchy - often says users do not have adequate security to view/add documents, but they do - if they sign out and back in, it works fine
  • At times, support can be lacking - sometimes case responses are delayed or you get an incorrect answer
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
Read full review
It checks all of our boxes at the moment.
Read full review
Usability
SL itself is relatively easy to use and most of the Help Files documentation is well kept and outstanding in the amount of information that is given. Most end users pick up the functions quickly and are off and running after some limited training. There will always be questions and research to be done, but overall SL is relatively easy to follow for a seasoned user
Read full review
Some things in Spectrum are NOT that intuitive, but I think knowledge of the software just comes with time. There are still some things I need assistance with in Spectrum but I'm very comfortable with my day to day items now that I've been using it for years. However, if there is something I don't do often or haven't done before, I don't find the software to be that intuitive, I actually find the logic on some things to be a little weird but it's fine once I know how to do it.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
Read full review
Very little down time. They host our system.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
For the most part the product is very reliable. Since we are hosted we sometimes have connectivity issues but I would say that is more our ISP than Spectrum.
Read full review
Support Rating
Many times support will tell you that your issue is an identified bug and will be scheduled in the future to be fixed in a future release. The knowledgebase has gotten worse in recent years and much more difficult to use. many times you can't find the error during the search
Read full review
The support has recently changed. Last year, you could call in and get an immediate response. Now that doesn't seem possible unless you have an urgent situation with access to the software, payroll or payables. I have found that using chat or e-mail works nicely for the most part, but sometimes I feel it would be easier if someone from support would jump on our site and take a first-hand look rather than going back and forth
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Our trainer was excellent and navigated the time zone differences expertly. She gave us test assignments to complete and was available for questions at any time.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
Read full review
It is important to have a strong implementation partner. It made the transition from our old system to the new system easier.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We started with QuickBooks Enterprise when our company was young. We quickly outgrew this program as it was not able to accommodate the financial reporting we needed to satisfy our investors. QuickBooks was also very limited in managing our revenue as we grew. We did try Great Plains and Peachtree (now Sage 50) and we discovered that they were rather complicated for our users. They were not as easy to maneuver and manipulate as SL and we felt that SL was much more "user friendly" and simplified, but still able to produce the same results.
Read full review
Spectrum, when compared to Simply accounting, is better. It has more options, and it is easy to navigate. Spectrum meets our needs better. Spectrum, when compared to Sage 300 Construction and Real Estate, is better. Spectrum has better connectivity between its project management system compared to Sage 300 Construction and Real Estate. Spectrum, when compared to CMIC, I believe they are equal. CMiC has a better project management system, but Spectrum has an easier accounting system to navigate.
Read full review
Scalability
Since the backbone of the database is MS SQLServer, the database can be easily scaled.
Read full review
You can grant user specific access which is nice. Project managers do not need all the same modules as Accounting. But Accounting does need access to PM modules as well
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Dramatic improvement in our ability to judge the profitability of jobs.
  • Lots of improvements in delivering invoices and statements to customers.
  • Automated AP approvals and imaging made our last tax audit a breeze.
  • Ease of reporting data is a big plus. Financial statements with drill down capability are very useful.
  • One integrated system means less data moving around and more real time information.
  • EFT payments, email statements and live linked Excel charts have improved our efficency
  • Too many more to name.
Read full review
  • Viewpoint Spectrum has allowed us the opportunity to be proactive in analyzing the costs for a project in time to make a difference in the outcome of the project. It has allowed us defense in supporting our communications with the project owners.
  • Viewpoint Spectrum has allowed us to become more productive with its accounting software and the cohesion between the modules. It has definitely streamlined the processing necessary to account for the business.
Read full review
ScreenShots