TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Microsoft Entra ID vs. WatchGuard AuthPoint

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft Entra ID

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Entra ID (formerly Microsoft Azure Active Directory or Azure AD) is a cloud-based identity and access management (IAM) solution supporting restricted access to applications with Azure Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) built-in, single sign-on (SSO), B2B collaboration controls, self-service password, and integration with Microsoft productivity and cloud storage (Office 365, OneDrive, etc) as well as 3rd party services.

    $6

    per user/per month

    WatchGuard AuthPoint

    Score9.2 out of 10
    N/AAuthPoint Total Identity Security provides businesses with a solution to protect user accounts and credentials. With multi-factor authentication and dark web credential monitoring, AuthPoint mitigates the risks associated with workforce credential attacks. AuthPoint adds an extra layer of security by monitoring for potential credential exposure in the dark web for both personal and corporate accounts.N/A
    Pricing
    Microsoft Entra IDWatchGuard AuthPoint
    Editions & Modules
    Premium P1
    $6.00
    per user/per month
    Premium P2
    $9.00
    per user/per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft Entra IDWatchGuard AuthPoint
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Microsoft Entra IDWatchGuard AuthPoint
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    WatchGuard Technologies
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    NordLayer did not provide the connections we needed, which WatchGuard AuthPoint did, allowing me to sync our on-site devices to the Cloud.
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    Although there can be issues with authentication conflicts that may cause account lock-outs, Microsoft Authenticator is simple and effective. One upside to WatchGuard AuthPoint is the longer timer for the authentication code time length, especially for users that aren't "fast …
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    I have used Authy, google authenticator, last pass, and a few others; the push notification is definitely more convenient than having to go look for the app and type the token every time.
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    AuthPoint has better integration with the product stack. Simpler to implement. Less complex of a setup. Easier to explain to customers and easier training for the engineering/support team. Licenses per user are good value and affordable for the majority of our small and …
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    AuthPoint was a clear choice when comparing these products. With a mixed OS environment, Cisco Duo did not seem to work well. Azure MFA does not work with MAC OS. Watchguard AuthPoint met what we needed.
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    We selected Authpoint as we already had WatchGuard security appliances in use at our organization. We also began to evaluate the product based on a recommendation from our MSP. They have several customers that use Authpoint, so it was recommended. It was also nice that they had …
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    We use the Microsoft MFA also and I have used the Google Authenticator (only prior to the MS version being released, however). They are similar in terms of functionality of course, but I have not attempted additional integrations using SAML 2.0 or anything like that so cannot …
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    It is only worth purchasing because of the cheap price and integration with WatchGuard VPN. The downside in trying to test a MFA product is having to configure your products (Tableau Online, Office365) to use it and therefore all users immediately will have issues unless using …
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    Both products are very useful, but have their own public.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Microsoft Entra IDWatchGuard AuthPoint
    Identity Management
    Comparison of Identity Management features of Microsoft Entra ID and WatchGuard AuthPoint
    Feature
    Microsoft Entra ID
    8.6
    94 Ratings
    WatchGuard AuthPoint
    -
    Ratings
    ID-Management Access Control8.992 Ratings00 Ratings
    ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)9.192 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-Factor Authentication9.293 Ratings00 Ratings
    Password Management8.889 Ratings00 Ratings
    Account Provisioning and De-provisioning8.988 Ratings00 Ratings
    ID Management Workflow Automation7.569 Ratings00 Ratings
    ID Risk Management8.071 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Microsoft Entra IDWatchGuard AuthPoint
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (121 ratings)
    8.7
    (220 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.4
    (15 ratings)
    8.5
    (20 ratings)
    Usability
    7.4
    (8 ratings)
    7.1
    (27 ratings)
    Availability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.1
    (21 ratings)
    7.0
    (52 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.7
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.7
    (3 ratings)
    7.5
    (13 ratings)
    Configurability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.3
    (3 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    7.4
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (3 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    Professional Services
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)