Microsoft Security Copilot helps security and IT teams to protect organizations at the speed and scale of AI. It is available in a standalone experience or embedded into other Microsoft Security products.
N/A
Arcsight by OpenText
Score 5.2 out of 10
N/A
A combined SIEM and SOAR, used to accelerate threat detection and response with holistic security analytics, native SOAR, and intelligent automation.
I think we have other products that we have evaluated. Since it's confidential, I can't share it. One is brand for Microsoft and the second is ease of use.
I mostly use it because of the AI. Mitre is more manual process. It's a very old process. So definitely using AI for security is the reason why I went for this product and kind of augmenting my skills is the reason why I chose this.
while answers from ChatGPT can be better some times , having Microsoft Security Copilot integrated directly in your stack is something completely different , it has awareness of you environment , EDR and XDR , security incidents in Microsoft sentinel , your entry ID enivrnment …
My usage of other products is based on SIEM tools. So far, Microsoft Security Copilot is the only product I've seen that works across multiple technologies/products to provide full visibility into security tooling using AI. I know other vendors are working towards this, but …
These are all AI tools buy Copilot is integrated with the Microsoft stack so it is already part of the normal workflow. It is also easier to manage because of this.
I have used mostly ChatGPT and Microsoft Security Copilot. I feel that Microsoft Security Copilot is a little bit better when helping with Microsoft products. I think both products can give you what you want, but Microsoft Security Copilot seems to use a more streamlined …
Copilot is already integrated with and built for the Microsoft stack. It lives in it natively, versus integrating with a third-party. You always know where your data is stored and used. The HIPAA compliance aspect is a big factor to as some third parties will not sign a BAA …
ArcSight Intelligence easily provides visibility to understand the logs and monitor the different devices .have features to manage multiple client with asingle console.searching is little bit hectic but we can mange these thing while using its filter creation process. It costs …
We are currently using Elastic search as well for better management of our devices and to keep all the loopholes filled that have been created around the non-upgraded version of Arcsight Enterprise Manager. Elastic searches have the latest mechanism to fetch logs and correlated …
Multiple platforms are already supported by Arcsight. Support is good. Scripts can be used to get data from multiple threat intel sources & the same can be used in correlation rules to detect any suspicious activity. Reporting features are good & you can check any backdated …
Actually we weren't [in a] decisive situation at that time. We had only a few weeks to make a decision and our firm has good relationships with the HP Support team. That's why I can't compare them all properly, but we searched these 2 different solutions to show differences.
Microsoft Security Copilot is well-suited for environments where security teams face high alert volumes and need rapid triage. It is effective during active threat response, helping us establish timelines and suggest remediation steps quickly. Copilot also excels in executive reporting, generating clear summaries for leadership without much effort. Security Copilot is less effective outside of Microsoft's ecosystem because it doesn't integrate well with other products.
In the current lot of hundreds of SIEM solutions out there in the market, ArcSight ESM is fairly less expensive with strong fundamentals in place. The log ingestion, correlation are very well performing and totally worth ROI. However, the tool has lost its way when it comes to staying abreast with current feature curve of SIEM technology and the evolution has not been done by MicroFocus. Search times are high and there is no major plug-in that has been introduced as part of the product life cycle.
I think this product can do much better in terms of static code analysis. I don't think it has the full bit of knowledge on various languages. If the product can improve on SaaS and also help with threat modeling, that should be a great addition.
It is easily accessible and provides a similar Copilot interface as other Microsoft services. The natural language processing allows users to interact with it in plain language which greatly reduces the learning curve. Theoretically, even non-technical users within a company could utilize the product to get data for reporting or analysis.
Overall, it is a good investment in order for an organization to stay compliant and stay secure from all the wild things happening. It is definitely a cost effective tool with some good features including correlation, log storage, reporting and dashboards. If a customer is looking for advanced set of features, then I would highly not recommend this.
If you go for platinum support, it's good as you have priority for support. They will take remote control of your machines and troubleshoot. Also, they arrange requirement SEM depending on the issue.
Microsoft Security Copilot is more orientated towards the work I do and business I work for which is Security in Azure or Microsoft Products. Comparing the products has minor differences unless given explicit scenarios. In general use all of the products can fit a need but Microsoft Security Copilot suits mine in my security role the best.
We are currently using Elastic search as well for better management of our devices and to keep all the loopholes filled that have been created around the non-upgraded version of Arcsight Enterprise Manager. Elastic searches have the latest mechanism to fetch logs and correlated data, as well as process them in a more useful way.
Helps reduce time spent creating a baseline script.
Some errors get corrected but then get reintroduced while adding functionality.
I noticed that when using this for PowerShell it will sometimes have you install the module in the script without verifying if it is already installed. You must read the script before executing.