Microsoft SharePoint vs. Oracle WebCenter Sites

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SharePoint
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's SharePoint is an Intranet solution that enables users to share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and collaborate across the organization.
$5
Per User Per Month
Oracle WebCenter Sites
Score 5.5 out of 10
N/A
Oracle WebCenter Sites is the new name for FatWire which Oracle acquired in 2011. It is a complete CMS often bundled with other Oracle WebCenter products to present a more comprehensive management solution for businesses and enterprises.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft SharePointOracle WebCenter Sites
Editions & Modules
Plan 1
$5.00
Per User Per Month
Plan 2
$10.00
Per User Per Month
Office 365 E3
$20.00
Per User Per Month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SharePointOracle WebCenter Sites
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft SharePointOracle WebCenter Sites
Features
Microsoft SharePointOracle WebCenter Sites
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Oracle WebCenter Sites
7.0
Ratings
14% below category average
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Oracle WebCenter Sites
5.5
Ratings
32% below category average
API00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Oracle WebCenter Sites
6.8
Ratings
13% below category average
WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Admin section00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Page templates00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Library of website themes00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Publishing workflow00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Form generator00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Oracle WebCenter Sites
6.2
Ratings
17% below category average
Content taxonomy00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
SEO support00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Bulk management00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Community / comment management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
User Ratings
Microsoft SharePointOracle WebCenter Sites
Likelihood to Recommend
9.3
(0 ratings)
5.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.8
(0 ratings)
4.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.6
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
4.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
6.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft SharePointOracle WebCenter Sites
Likelihood to Recommend
SharePoint Document Management excels as a central repository for storing, organising, and retrieving documents. It supports version control, metadata tagging, secure access, and integration with tools like Power Automate. At our organisation, it's used for managing contracts, policies, and supplier documents. SharePoint Workflow Automation integrates with Power Automate to streamline approvals, gather feedback, and automate recurring tasks. This reduces reliance on email chains and manual trackers.
Read full review
Oracle WebCenter Sites is very well suited to presenting marketing content in all shapes and forms, including mobile, an in a corporate web site. Oracle WebCenter Sites can also manage small product catalogs easily. Important things to consider when selecting a CMS:
  • How important is the ease with which my business users update content?
  • How often are updates made?
  • How distributed are my business contributors?
  • How important is preview in my organization's workflow and publishing process?
Read full review
Pros
  • Making collaboration easier via a better connection between accounts. You can share anything from a file to events with just a couple of clicks.
  • All services are connected and switching between services is a breeze[.]
  • Solutions to the majority of everyday business problems.
Read full review
  • Timely management of web content including examining future designs and enhancements.
  • Targeting of customer groups.
  • Analytical capabilities to help define usage and gather info for future refinements.
Read full review
Cons
  • There are far too many good features to choose from, and advanced features are noticeably absent.
  • There is room for improvement in terms of integration with non-Microsoft products, as well as developer Story.
  • It is challenging to provide easier access via file explorer while also granting outside users and guests access.
Read full review
  • Creating new content is not so easy
  • Publishing is not trivial
  • In my opinion documentation is weak
  • I think there are cheaper solutions then WCS
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We have too much invested at this point to do anything different and there are too many reasons as a company our size to keep it. We are heavily licensed out for Microsoft and have 12 years of SharePoint development baked into who we are. Extracting that as a tool at this point would be dumb and devastating. There are no like-kind competitors to it at an enterprise level that scale and integrate as well.
Read full review
A valuable tool for enabling marketers and business users to easily create and manage contextually relevant social and interactive online experiences across multiple channels on a global scale to drive sales and loyalty. It also allows multi-site management (in fact Sites) using the assets and template developed, without having to re-implement again for each individual site.
Read full review
Usability
No usability issues reported. Individual teams also have allocated areas which replace legacy shared drives on local LANs. Access to Sharepoint resources is fully integrated with corporate Active Directory with additional two-factor authentication required for administrative users. Users have access to Microsoft Services Hub which allows you to create, manage, and track support requests while staying current on Microsoft technologies with access to select self-paced learning paths
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Support for SharePoint is quite good. Microsoft provides good support. Microsoft offers
  • Quick turnaround time for issues
  • A range of support services
  • Access to a network of resources
  • Escalation of issues
  • Ongoing development and commitment to produce enhancement
The majority of support is required for initial installation. Once complete and the system is operating we have had very few support issues.
Read full review
The WebCenter Sites Support team is extremely good and very responsive to client needs. They are quick to resolve Level 1 issues and when escalated to Level 2, the team makes every effort to keep the client informed.
Read full review
In-Person Training
The face to face training I received was on SharePoint Administration. It was rushed as there was a lot of information to cover and the application of the labs weren't that great either. I like to be able to relate what I am learning to what I am currently doing.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
I like to learn at my own pace and online training allows for that. Additionally, you can skip through pieces of content that you already know or are already comfortable with. Microsoft actually offers great videos on their website for basic fundamental SharePoint Training. I have used these training videos in some of my own training sessions with end users.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Planning to the last detail would be advised. SharePoint is a very large application that takes a lot of finesse to get operational
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The reasons for selecting MS SharePoint are: SharePoint provides ease of use and web design assistance and support SharePoint helps you schedule your content for publishing. enables users to share documents with external parties and offers a better internal structure of the content and better indexing and searching capabilities.
Read full review
There are lot of WCM products available in the market, some free and some licensed. But for a organisation using more Oracle products and on Java technology, WCS is the best in class, for intranet and internet needs. It has everything which is required for a web application. Also it can be well integrated with other platforms with Oracle Document Cloud/Oracle Content/Oracle Identity Manager and a lot more. Its a well integrated product. It can also be integrated with social media using a community plugin. It also comes with its own search and analytics tools. The templates are pure JSP and can be easily coded by Java developers using the development guide. Its based on Java, so writing custom applications and integrating is easy
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We've recently implemented Microsoft SharePoint access via iPads for our Template teams out on job sites. They can easily upload CAD / Laser files into Microsoft SharePoint for our production team to review in real time. Serious ROI when we don't have to wait for our Template team to get back to the shop!
  • We have multiple physical locations. Microsoft SharePoint allows users at each location to collaborate by working on documents simultaneously. Allowing us to solve multi-site problems & strategize on multi-site initiatives much faster!
  • We can also share key information with external partners. As long as they have a registered MS account (not necessarily an O365 account) we can share our information with them in a variety of ways. This allows consistent & concise communication with our partners.
Read full review
  • It has alleviated some of the burden on our IT staff.
  • It has allowed our Marketing department to be more hands-on with content changes, and they have more flexibility with the types of changes and how often they make them.
Read full review
ScreenShots