Microsoft Stream vs. Panopto

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Stream
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Stream is an enterprise video option available to users of Microsoft 365 as part of the Office 365 E1 edition tier. Users can create explainer videos and send videos to Teams channels, SharePoint sites, Microsoft Viva Engage posts, Microsoft Viva Connections, and Microsoft365.com to inform and align with colleagues in the flow of work.N/A
Panopto
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Panopto is a video management platform for businesses and universities from the company of the same name in Seattle, supporting the recording, sharing, live streaming, and (after recording) sharing via LMS or internal video site, video search, and virtual classroom.
$14.99
per month
Pricing
Microsoft StreamPanopto
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Pro
$14.99
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft StreamPanopto
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft StreamPanopto
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Stream
Chose Microsoft Stream
Consensus is better for lead generation and sharing marketing content; however, Stream is most appropriate for capturing meeting recordings when using teams. its integration flawlessly allows for such a slick process that using an external solution wouldn't.
Panopto
Chose Panopto
Panopto has the best captioning features that I've seen for a video repository. This enables us to caption videos quickly and efficiently. It also has tags and chaptering which makes viewing videos easier. We can also link videos inside Panopto to outside entities without …
Chose Panopto
The only other products like Panopto that I have used are Studio (which is part of the Canvas LMS) and Tegrity.

Studio seems to be much more limited in its functionality, but perhaps it is intended to serve a different audience/market. I prefer Panopto's ability to link to …
Chose Panopto
Overall, Panopto is much better organization. Their is no case against this!
Chose Panopto
Panopto holds us fairly well against these other tools as a recorder and basic editor. It's easy to download the application or use a browser based tool to start recording in a few minutes. Video encoding is relatively fast so content can be distributed to students quickly. …
Chose Panopto
Kaltura is sleeker and more polished, both on the user-facing and backend. Panopto has been doing in-class lecture capture for longer, but Kaltura's new(er) offering is catching up. Kaltura was easier and more intuitive for faculty and instructors in many ways. Panopto is still …
Chose Panopto
At the end of the day, it came down to affordability for us. Panopto is affordable for smaller institutions. It is also geared primarily at lecture capture compared to many of the others that are first a media library. Panopto's focus is also education, so they do understand …
Chose Panopto
Cost wise, unless you have a huge audience, Panopto is better.

Both Zoom Meeting and Kaltura and for more expensive and a smaller program/company may not have the demand to justify them.
Chose Panopto
Camtasia, now TechSmith Relay, is also a screen capture program. It is very basic and just captures the screen. Panopto allows you to edit your videos more, create quizzes to incorporate into the videos, and can automatically create closed captioning for your videos, which …
Features
Microsoft StreamPanopto
Video Marketing
Comparison of Video Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Stream
-
Ratings
Panopto
7.0
Ratings
7% below category average
Video personalization00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
eCommerce00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Support for advertisements00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Video SEO00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Video Platform Integrations
Comparison of Video Platform Integrations features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Stream
-
Ratings
Panopto
9.4
Ratings
41% above category average
Integration to LMS00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Video Security
Comparison of Video Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Stream
-
Ratings
Panopto
8.8
Ratings
1% below category average
Video access controls00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
User management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Video link sharing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Internal video00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
External video00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Video Player
Comparison of Video Player features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Stream
-
Ratings
Panopto
8.5
Ratings
1% above category average
Player customization00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Embedded videos00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Video quality / Bandwidth controls00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Mobile compatibility00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Video Analytics
Comparison of Video Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Stream
-
Ratings
Panopto
7.5
Ratings
4% below category average
A/B testing00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Streaming quality reports00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Per viewer tracking00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Per video tracking00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Video analytics dashboard00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Video Hosting, Management & Storage
Comparison of Video Hosting, Management & Storage features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Stream
-
Ratings
Panopto
8.1
Ratings
7% below category average
On-Demand video00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Live streaming00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Impact of streaming on network00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Video upload & format support00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Video library / File management00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Video portal00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Video Engagement
Comparison of Video Engagement features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Stream
-
Ratings
Panopto
8.8
Ratings
10% above category average
Audience polling00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Audience Q&A / Live chat00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Video comments00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft StreamPanopto
Small Businesses
Wistia
Wistia
Score 9.7 out of 10
Wistia
Wistia
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Flipgrid
Flipgrid
Score 1.0 out of 10
Flipgrid
Flipgrid
Score 1.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Panopto
Panopto
Score 8.0 out of 10
Ensemble Video
Ensemble Video
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft StreamPanopto
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft StreamPanopto
Likelihood to Recommend
Stream is good for recording and capturing discussion from meetings. I would say that it isnt appropriate where there is lots of detail and lots of varying topics discussed as the summarising tool can in these instances be too broad. It is really good where meetings have been left or missed; as the notes and transcript allow for easy catchup
Read full review
The more I used it, the more I appreciated its ease of use. If I ever ran into a situation that I felt might be a learning opportunity at some point in the future, I would simply log in, record a session, and only allow access if/when it was appropriate later. Since the more recent versions also work on mobile phones, there really wasn't a time when I couldn't record something to review or present later. During covid, teachers didn't have access to their normal equipment, and students weren't always able to get access to a robust recording setup to do their recordings. Some students actually did recordings of presentations in their cars, or in the stairwells. Portability is powerful. I think that we all run into situations where our presentation didn't go quite as well as we had intended. As Panopto grew, they focused more on allowing the user to control their content and perform some basic (I would argue more than basic) editing, which made actions like awkward pauses easy to "fix" as you could create smooth, blended transitions easily.
Read full review
Pros
  • Records Meetings
  • Transcribes voice to text
  • Summarise discussed audio into concise notes
Read full review
  • It captures multiple streams simultaneous (video, desktop, audio only etc) and is pretty smart when it comes to working with imported PowerPoint Decks.
  • The end product can easily be shared in multiple formats and it has pretty rich content editing abilities for doing basic post-production clean up.
  • They have recently introduced an in-line quizzing feature which can integrate with your LMS's Gradebook.
  • The Analytics feature is very strong - we can get student level analytics when we integrate/embed the videos into our LMS.
Read full review
Cons
  • Notes summarised could be more accurate
  • Transcript could be more accurate with regional accents
  • Sharing recordings could be slicker from Stream
Read full review
  • Captions are always a problem for us. We would like to caption all our videos and currently, the automatic captioning is not very good.
  • We would like integration with our VLE grade book to allow seamless submission and grading for students.
Read full review
Usability
Its integration into the Teams stack allows for ease of use without having to leave the application to access it elsewhere. Its interface is intuitive and easy to use. Sharing could be better. Transcripts and notes are very good
Read full review
Needs some work, but I'm sure improvements will come over time
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Panopto has been quick to answer any questions, but their rollouts and updates have caused issues where we felt a little blindsided by unexpected changes. Their development cycle is slow and often their promises for future updates have been extremely slow or never come.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Consensus is better for lead generation and sharing marketing content; however, Stream is most appropriate for capturing meeting recordings when using teams. its integration flawlessly allows for such a slick process that using an external solution wouldn't
Read full review
Panopto has the best captioning features that I've seen for a video repository. This enables us to caption videos quickly and efficiently. It also has tags and chaptering which makes viewing videos easier. We can also link videos inside Panopto to outside entities without needing them to have a Panopto account. Panopto works best if you have a LOT of video content, but if you only have some or don't care about organization, SharePoint (or Microsoft Stream) might be a cheaper/more efficient option.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Helps to solve disputes with clients on what was said in meetings
  • Allows quick review of meetings without spending 2hrs re watching
  • Sharing of notes helps collaboration internally
Read full review
  • During the pandemic, Panopto allows our faculty to quickly stage up lectures that were normally delivered in person, and these recordings reached thousands of students who could not come to campus for class.
  • Both faculty and student report high satisfaction with the flexibility and convenience of having Panopto video content available in a course to watch and rewatch for learner reinforcement.
  • Panopto's adaptable media distribution reduced impact on student technology and internet speeds when they might not have access to broadband connections, allowing them to continue to access essential course materials.
  • Speech to text capabilities. increase accessibility compliance of media content.
  • Archiving training materials in Panopto allows faculty, staff, TAs, and students to easily find recordings for reference.
Read full review
ScreenShots