Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM) vs. SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's System Center Operations Manager (SCOM) is a monitoring and application performance management option, with the core datacenter and cloud-based systems monitoring.N/A
SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
SolarWinds® Virtualization Manager (VMAN) is a tool for monitoring, performance management, capacity planning and optimization for on-premises or cloud-based virtual environments. It also integrates with other SolarWinds products.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Considered Both Products
Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
The capability of SCOM as far as monitoring Windows systems is concerned is far greater than any monitoring product out there as both are a Microsoft product so integration and discoveries work well and fast.
Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
This was used to monitor uor non-Windows systems and was cumbersome. Their licensing was per device with how many agents you needed; however, with System Center Operations Manager, their billing was a lot easier for their product.
Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
All comparative features are way expensive and complex to configure in all other competitors. Value to money and ease of deployment for Microsoft based environment
Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
SCOM is better than OMi for Windows-based servers monitoring.
You need to know how to use Visual Studio to customize the management pack.
Dynatrace is way better for all Application Performance Manager.
Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
It is an excellent product for monitoring features like Exchange, Active Directory, DNS. Monitors are custom designed and can be adjusted to any system. Great monitors can be created even when monitoring open-source systems.
Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
It is used to monitor network device health status, similar to SCOM. Microsoft SCOM is far superior, however.
Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
This is our first solution and we have been using it for many years.
Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
It's the best product that is not heavier like other software of its kind.
Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
SCCM is more streamlined and has better integration than 3rd party platforms.
Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
SolarWinds stacks well on the ease of use with an easily installable version and highly modular (products can be added to the basic installation and are easily managed from a single endpoint. System Center Operations Manager was selected because the majority of the environment …
Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
We didn't consider any other alternatives, nor did we try or demo any other product prior to our purchase of SCOM. I know there are several other products out that perform many of the same functions and more such as SolarWinds, however, those products are pricey as well and we …
Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
HP SiteScope is truly an agentless solution, with all the limitations of such approach, SCOM also has limited functionality for agentless monitoring, but you always can switch to agent-based configuration in SCOM, but not in SiteScope. Datadog is a good cloud-based monitoring …
Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
Our organization currently uses Nagios and while it is a much cheaper alternative, you just don't get the features and capabilities that SCOM offers. Nagios seems to be limited to basic monitoring and alerts. SCOM is tailored to our TFS environment out of the box with the TFS …
Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
We used Altiris and WSUS and in the beginning Altiris had the better admin interface than SCOM, but it is no longer the case as SCOM has refined their admin interface. Altiris still has better and more robust group assignments for management roles and those two other tools can …
Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
The monitoring market is a really crowded one. While I think SCOM is the best solution for Microsoft-centric scenarios, competitors like Nagios or Tivoli may fit better for different expectations. Some companies with specific objectives (like ITIL management) could be pushed to …
Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
We only had What's Up Gold in the past. What's Up Gold could not monitor services or performance of a server. It only would ping for up and down and we also used it for some SNMP monitoring with printers. SCOM had more features and was a more robust solution.
Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
N/A
Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
SCOM naturally competes with other monitoring products on the market. It's obvious, that monitoring products, such as SQLSentry ot RedGate SQL Monitor can do specific workload monitoring better, but when you need to have centralized monitoring solution - SCOM is the best! …
Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
I strongly believe, SolarWinds is the leader in monitoring and managing everything/anything network related, not saying Microsoft can't develop SCOM to beat SolarWinds, but Microsoft really needs to step back and figure out how far they want to take SCOM and what's the end goal …
Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
SolarWinds Application and Server monitoring is the right choice for many organizations. However, it does not provide the flexibility of monitoring that System Center Operations Manager provides. Smaller organizations might want to consider SolarWinds for application and server …
Chose Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
It has more intuitive features and business ready monitoring capabilities
SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
To be honest we never looked into any other products. We already made use of SolarWinds SAN, and once we found out SolarWinds was also able to monitor our virtual environment, we immediately had a trial of the software. We were very happy with what the VMAN component had to …
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
ScienceLogic SL1
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
We selected [SolarWinds] VMAN because we already had [SolarWinds] products and it was simple enough to get it added in.
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
In the past we had used VMware's VRealize yet this integration into our Orion platform makes it easier to work with plus there is price savings when we moved to VMAN.
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
The operation began using Nagios Xi, after a year of use, and based on the results obtained, we realized that what our client wanted was not fully met. Our client asked us to use WhatsUp, however, SolarWinds covered in a more efficient way what was required by our client (IT) …
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
SolarWinds VMAN provides comprehensive monitoring and performance metrics for your VM environment. Provides Recommendations for optimal VM performance. SolarWinds VMAN integrates with the Orion Platform and provides a single pane of glass for monitoring your entire VM …
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Logic Monitoring
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
We chose SolarWinds for the price point, the ability for Single Pain of Glass monitoring for Dashboards, and having a single vendor to support all our monitoring needs.
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Honestly we didn't check in depth other vendors, because we use the entire Solarwinds Eco-system.
So first of all, we want to keep one unique tool to handle everything. In addition the migration to another product would be super difficult or nearly impossible.
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Datadog and Log Monitor are doing great in bringing in new technologies for monitoring, however SolarWinds has still got edges since we are using it [for] many years. By using [it], we know that their product development team was always on top of new technologies monitoring. …
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
  • Good performance of the application
  • Visually well designed
  • Really useful topology creation in comparison to most competitors
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Better performance monitoring. Was able to see bottlenecks in our network that we were able to address. Ability to set thresholds and critical warning alerts to match our specific business needs and parameters. The predefined reports helped us with metrics to ensure the …
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
If you used these two products, you know the difference. It's too vast to explain here. PRTG does have its place in a network, but SolarWinds is the high bar in this space.
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Virtualization Manager does a much better job of bringing all of the relevant system information together in an easy to view and use interface.
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Veeam ONE is a product to compare against SolarWinds Virtualization Manager. Veeam ONE is a solid product, however, SolarWinds Virtualization Manager has multiple product tie-ins for a bigger more complete picture of the total environment it is deployed in. It is hard to put a …
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
We have trialed almost all of the SolarWinds family of products if they were seen to have a potential positive effect on our environment and ability to find/resolve problems. We are currently using all of the products outlined previously as it gives us an excellent top down …
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
It has the capability of all monitoring products individually and it is easy to work within the VMware monitoring tool.
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
We have had so much success with Solarwinds that we did not look at any other options.
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
In our experience, the market for exemplary tools for managing a VMware environment is pretty small. Either go with the VMware tools, which may or may not be part of your enterprise licensing, or use a 3rd-party platform. If you have a multi-vendor environment (say VMware + …
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
None.
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
The Cisco solution is more expensive and complex to install and configure
The VMware horizon does not detect and manage the non VMware VMs such as Microsoft Hyper-V
In case the environment is purely VMware, then VMware horizon provides more possibilities of managing the VMs and …
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Seamless incorporation into the Orion framework. We needed a tool to tell us what was going on with our vSphere environment beyond what vCenter was telling us. There are just 2 of us that manage 40 ESXi hosts on1000 virtual machines and we needed some additional insight. I have …
Features
Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Application Performance Management
Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
6.1
Ratings
22% below category average
SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
-
Ratings
Application monitoring5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Database monitoring9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Threshold alerts10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive capabilities2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Application performance management console3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration tools6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Out-of-the box templates to monitor applications4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Application dependency mapping and thresholding4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Virtualization monitoring7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Server availability and performance monitoring10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Server usage monitoring and capacity forecasting8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
IT Asset Discovery5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Veeam ONE
Veeam ONE
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.8 out of 10
Veeam ONE
Veeam ONE
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.8 out of 10
Foglight
Foglight
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Likelihood to Recommend
Well suited for IT Departments that can budget the funds and time needed for setup and maintenance of SCOM. The end product is well suited for medium to large environments that have 100's of resources that require monitoring and reporting. Enterprise level statistics are at your fingertips with a few clicks of a mouse after the product has been configured and agents have been deployed. As I said previously, we are a small business and I was fortunate enough to be able to budget this product into our environment. It did take us a while to configure and fully deploy, but as a result, we are well-informed and are able to extract detailed information as it pertains to usage/consumption of our workstation and server resources to include performance metrics and any errors that may arise.
Read full review
[It is well suited for] full integration with the virtual environment (VMware vcenter in our case). [It is also useful] when updating [the] host to a new version, including [a] new version of VM Tools. Messages are automatically created in SolarWinds VMAN to notice which VM's still need to be updated with [the] newer version of VM tools. This [makes] management [easy].
Read full review
Pros
  • SCOM can manage Windows OS systems from desktops to servers very well.
  • SCOM is platform agnostic in that we manage physical and virtual machines with no differentiation.
  • SCOM can quickly deploy emergency security patches and the best part is it can provide detailed results of success and failure rate of patch deployment.
Read full review
  • I created custom dashboards, to view the different elements of the virtual environment. For example, you can view the number of online VMs and those off, or disconnected. You can also choose to see the status of every virtual cluster, the storage disk usage on every VM, the RAM usage, CPU usage.
  • I used this application to see the growth of virtual memory in each cluster and accordingly do forecasting for future growth. A capacity planner included in this application would help in doing accurate estimations and setting a future upgrade budget.
  • Another powerful tool was the customized reports, where i could generate reports on any element of the VM or cluster. Reports can be exported to Excel or PDF and are very useful for sharing information with colleagues and management.
  • Alerts can be customized. For example, you can set a rule to get an email alert if any virtual server RAM usage exceeds 85% and send a text message if RAM usage exceeds 90% for more than 10 minutes.
Read full review
Cons
  • It is a monster of a system and really needs a person managing the system full time
  • Options are a bit clunky especially when you need to set overrides.
  • Takes a lot of time and effort to setup alerts as you want them, don't rely on the out of the box options you need to invest time into the system to get what you want out of it.
  • Make sure you size the underlying database server/s correctly (Microsoft provide a tool to calculate based on number of objects you plan to collect data on), it is a datawarehouse underneath after all.
Read full review
  • Server trending could be stronger. A server which sits at the same resource usage day in and day out can be normal operation while Virtualization manager may report it as an issue.
  • Orion in general can be painful to change a node page with the desired screens and widgets
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft System Center Operations Manager is tightly integrated to Microsoft Windows servers os monitoring with great product support.
Read full review
Critical component for companies ability to maintain services both customer facing as well as internal systems. Without insight into our VM estate provided by VMAN outage duration as well as frequency would increase to unacceptable levels. VMAN has allowed us to consolidate multiple monitoring mechanisms into one, as part of the Orion suite providing us with 1 solution. This has the added benefit of enabling our engineers to focus on learning 1 solution oppose to multiple solutions, meaning we're able to handle administration and support of our monitoring across the whole company alot more efficiently from a time spent resource as well as savings on costings.
Read full review
Usability
Ease of Use and user friendly dashboard
Read full review
SolarWinds VMAN is easy to use for everyone. When I say everyone which literally means anyone e.g. Virtualization Environment SME, Consultant, Support Team, Management Officers etc. Anyone who have worked on IT technologies could easily deploy SolarWinds by reading videos, Thwack posts or Virtual Classrooms (Custom Success Centers) - this makes this application easy to operation and for maintenance support is always there.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
We have yet to enconter any issues in terms of availability. We have a highly available SQL cluster running Orion.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
We find page load times to be quite slow at times. Flipping between tabs can also be very slow.
Read full review
Support Rating
Hard to get support. The product is not being actively developed anymore, so it is hard to get new features for the product.
Read full review
SolarWinds gives good support. I have never had a time when i was working through a support case where I did not get the support I needed for the required issues to be resolved. I have always had resolutions from SolarWinds support. They are top notch. Issues once had are no more.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Easy to install with intuitive interactive interface during the installation process a and integration to MS SQL was smooth
Read full review
Pretty straighforward, as long as you check Solarwinds site for recommended installation path. KEY ITEM - be sure that you know which versions of all SolarWinds products you are using, because there are incompatability issues between versions for many products. It took me about 2 hours with a spreadsheet to figure out an upgrade path. Don't assume that the version you downloaded is the right/most current version without checking first!
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
SolarWinds stacks well on the ease of use with an easily installable version and highly modular (products can be added to the basic installation and are easily managed from a single endpoint. System Center Operations Manager was selected because the majority of the environment is based on Windows products and it was part of the licensing agreement. It offered an easy way to consolidate the monitoring tools to provide a single point of management.
Read full review
To be honest we never looked into any other products. We already made use of SolarWinds SAN, and once we found out SolarWinds was also able to monitor our virtual environment, we immediately had a trial of the software. We were very happy with what the VMAN component had to offer as well as having it integrate into our already existing SolarWinds SAM environment.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
Purchasing the correct license allows the platform to scale with your environment.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Since we are at the tail end of our POC, we have no immediate ROI to report.
  • That said, during the POC, we immediately identified several issues within TFS that we immediately addressed and will potentially save us hours of lost time and troubleshooting.
Read full review
  • VMAN has been used for reports provided to executive-level meetings. These reports showed our growth patterns, allowing for easier decisions on purchasing additional hardware.
  • VMAN has provided a positive impact on allowing for near real-time monitoring of resources, able to pinpoint when services are using more memory than expected, not running at all, or other options as defined.
  • VMAN was purchased to help monitor our VMware platform, the added abilities for AWS allowed us to migrate clients from on-prem to cloud-based with the same views.
Read full review
ScreenShots

SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN) Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of