Microsoft Teams Rooms vs. Skype (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Teams Rooms
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
A solution to turn any space into a meeting room designed for inclusive collaboration, where everyone can fully participate.N/A
Skype (discontinued)
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
Skype (the personal edition or Skype free) was a web meeting, video conferencing, and VoIP software, now superseded by Microsoft Teams' free edition and unsupported from May 2025.
$2.99
per month
Pricing
Microsoft Teams RoomsSkype (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
United States Subscription
$2.99
per month
North America Subscription
$6.99
per month
India Subscription
$7.99
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Teams RoomsSkype (discontinued)
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Teams RoomsSkype (discontinued)
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Teams Rooms
Chose Microsoft Teams Rooms
Microsoft Teams Rooms has been more cost effective for us than using a separate subscription from another vendor. With our microsoft 365 tenant already in-place we've streamlined our configuration and licensing into a single management portal which really suites us and the way …
Chose Microsoft Teams Rooms
Microsoft Teams Rooms is very similar to WebEx and Zoom. Webex is no longer an option, and we use Microsoft Teams Rooms more frequently than Zoom simply due to its functionality and ease of use for our team. It is also more cost-effective than the other options, which is a very …
Chose Microsoft Teams Rooms
I consider MTR better because it first allows integration with all the Microsoft apps and is more cost-effective, considering all the included services such as the Office app, Cloud Storage, and email.
Chose Microsoft Teams Rooms
Limited customization options vs Microsoft Teams Rooms.
Chose Microsoft Teams Rooms
Microsoft Teams Rooms is better than Yealink conferencing phones but not better than Webex app or the Webex conferencing devices. Microsoft Teams Rooms have better system features than Yealink devices. Yealink lacks in variety of features and also focuses more on core …
Skype (discontinued)
Chose Skype (discontinued)
Selected Skype because it was the only platform that was available for such purposes for video conferencing or audio conferencing. Since Microsoft, the tech giant, backed it, it was assured that it would work great in terms of productivity, with utmost security measures for all …
Chose Skype (discontinued)
All of these other products have kept up with advancements in VoIP and communication technology and have expanded their portfolio of grouped services with their applications while Skype has been pretty stagnant
Chose Skype (discontinued)
We use Skype in combination with Grasshopper. While Grasshopper acts as a routing toll free number with extensions, if we are making calls directly, we do it through Skype.

Skype's desktop and mobile apps are easier to use, and provide unlimited local calls at a flat, …
Chose Skype (discontinued)
Teams is more professional, Calendar integration with Outlook is possible so that is plus point as compared to Skype. Many people use Teams and are comfortable on it so it is good for us. But yes, Skype is the only business communication tool which enables calling on mobile …
Chose Skype (discontinued)
Skype is great for one on one calls and easy catch ups. However, when it comes to talking in a more professional setting and in a group setting, we have gone with other communication services. Skype is great for video conferencing with one other person though and I would …
Chose Skype (discontinued)
As a whole business, we did not go with Skype. But for selected use cases we did. These scenarios were based upon what technology the other parties had access to. They were comfortable using Skype so we adapted to using it. We have used it to connect classes on site and off …
Chose Skype (discontinued)
Skype is a great app for various purposes, such as texting, calling, video chatting, and even holding virtual meetings. Regardless of connection speed, it provides the best quality and user experience. Skype's user base, reliability, and ease of use are unrivaled, and because …
Chose Skype (discontinued)
As WhatsApp business is not useful as skype because there are certain features which were not as useful as those available on skype. Whatsapp has a file size limit while transferring data, it doesn't have screen sharing which is a big drawback, and cannot be used as a …
Chose Skype (discontinued)
Skype is more user-friendly and has a better-suited option for us, plus its acceptability is unique and very much welcomed all over. Professionals are already adhered to interphase and using for their personal use and no such training costs were involved as in this region its a …
Chose Skype (discontinued)
It’s extremely user-friendly. Truthfully I use multiple different applications that serve similar purposes depending on what our partners are familiar working with. Skype has had pretty dependable connectivity compared to others I’ve used. Also very simple to set up and share …
Chose Skype (discontinued)
They are close but TEAMs had a wider adoption in the general community which led to us leaning on TEAMs a bit more.
Chose Skype (discontinued)
As a business messaging solution, Skype for Business has been replaced by Microsoft Teams which has been a significant upgrade. But the normal Skype hasn't really changed or developed much over the years leading to a steady decline in its customer base as well. A few years back …
Chose Skype (discontinued)
Skype is inexpensive and easy to use, and all of us may access it through the internet. Because of concerns about privacy and security, I value Skype's longevity much. With this system, we can deal with people in distant locations since it is more dependable regularly. The …
Chose Skype (discontinued)
For security and privacy reasons, Skype's existence for the past 15 years is incredibly important to me
Chose Skype (discontinued)
Microsoft Teams is more suitable for teams who share information in Channels. It also allows simple management of tasks and projects through the integrated Kanban Board. Zoom and Webex Meetings are more suitable for holding Webinars. Zoom is easy to use for holding meetings …
Chose Skype (discontinued)
Skype was used literally only cause it was included in the Microsoft Suite and we did not need to pay for another service. However, after using it for some time and constantly running into audio/video issues (especially during client presentations when sharing powerpoint, …
Chose Skype (discontinued)
Skype overall is easier to use than a lot of comparable collaboration tools on the market. It really doesn't require formal training to use, and most users get used to all the features of the platform pretty quick overall. Some other collaboration tools may offer more …
Chose Skype (discontinued)
Lee's functionality than Zoom, more glitches and log in complications than Google, but affordable and familiar for most of our clients and staff, which makes it an easy tool for a nonprofit. In general, we use Zoom and Google more but Skype is still a useful tool.
Chose Skype (discontinued)
Skype works better than Google Hangouts simply because everyone in the organization has a skype address that comes from being an employee here. Not everyone has a google account, so it's hard to meet or use Google tools.
The university has also worked with Zoom so that we can …
Chose Skype (discontinued)
Skype is more user-friendly than these other products. Skype has a simple, easy-to-understand user interface that even newcomers to audio/video conferencing can understand intuitively. While Skype and Zoom offer similar features, they are loaded down with extras: more buttons …
Chose Skype (discontinued)
Team meetings are easy with Skype. Demo presentations are another thing where it stands out from the rest of its competitors. Reminders are another thing done here. Video conferencing and screen sharing is very much improved through Skype and Skype for Business desktop and …
Chose Skype (discontinued)
When trying to video chat using other apps, and the call is breaking, after switching to Skype, usually the call/video quality is better.
In comparison to UnerConference, uberconference has web client (no need to install software). Also has conference rooms, where you can log …
Chose Skype (discontinued)
We have Cisco Jabber, Zoom and Rocket. Chat rolled out across organizations but they all lack the flexibility and attractiveness of Skype when it's coming to day-to-day work and solving business needs, even though they possess some important features and characteristics that …
Chose Skype (discontinued)
I'm not a fan of Zoom. It tries to steer you towards downloading an app even though you can simply log into a meeting via your browser (though it hides the latter functionality as hard as it can). I was an invitee to a reoccurring Zoom meeting and lost the invite link after a …
Features
Microsoft Teams RoomsSkype (discontinued)
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
6.8
Ratings
16% below category average
Skype (discontinued)
9.4
Ratings
17% above category average
High quality audio8.10 Ratings9.70 Ratings
High quality video8.10 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements4.00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Mobile support7.00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
7.8
Ratings
2% below category average
Skype (discontinued)
9.1
Ratings
14% above category average
Desktop sharing8.60 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Whiteboards7.10 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
8.2
Ratings
1% below category average
Skype (discontinued)
9.4
Ratings
13% above category average
Calendar integration8.10 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Meeting initiation8.10 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Record meetings / events8.60 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Slideshows8.10 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Integrates with social media00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
8.0
Ratings
2% below category average
Skype (discontinued)
9.6
Ratings
16% above category average
Live chat7.50 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Audience polling8.00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Q&A8.50 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
8.5
Ratings
5% above category average
Skype (discontinued)
9.6
Ratings
17% above category average
User authentication9.10 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions8.60 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Confidential attendee list8.00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
VoIP system collaboration
Comparison of VoIP system collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
8.7
Ratings
10% above category average
Skype (discontinued)
9.2
Ratings
16% above category average
Video conferencing8.50 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Audio conferencing8.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Video screen sharing9.10 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Instant messaging8.50 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Teams RoomsSkype (discontinued)
Small Businesses
Whereby
Whereby
Score 9.9 out of 10
Whereby
Whereby
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
JioMeet
JioMeet
Score 10.0 out of 10
JioMeet
JioMeet
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Webex Meetings
Webex Meetings
Score 8.4 out of 10
Webex Meetings
Webex Meetings
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Teams RoomsSkype (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
7.5
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Teams RoomsSkype (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft Teams Rooms has been pretty effective for our business. It has allowed multiple members of our team to connect remotely and stay on the same page with any changes, etc. A few times, the screen sharing option didn't work great, but otherwise, the product has been beneficial.
Read full review
Skype is an excellent choice for phone calls, both local and international, and is also one of the most affordable solutions for business office line. It is simple to use and get started with and provides a call experience on mobile that is similar to a regular phone call. It is not the ideal tool for team chat. For text-based team communication, a separate dedicated tool is still ideal
Read full review
Pros
  • Camera view selection is a nice feature which allows remote users to choose the camera feedback to select for better experience.
  • Live reactions like hand claps, thumbs up, raised hands,etc can be used to indicate to presenters that a meeting attendee has a question. This is cool.
  • We can connect our laptop seamlessly to the Microsoft Teams Rooms to share our content or presentation which makes things very simple.
Read full review
  • Perfect for chatting via text. Has emojis, file sharing, audio sharing, and even video sharing capabilities.
  • Good for video chats. You can do 1 on 1 sessions with a good quality video.
  • Privacy is also another important function they have. They allow for private conversations between users.
  • Ability to delete conversations with sensitive information you may not want seen by users not authorized. Can share confidential information via Skype.
  • Customizable profiles to fit your company culture.
Read full review
Cons
  • Improve AI Camera to frame participants in large rooms
  • no translation captions in real team for multilingual teams
  • new elements to introduce quizzes and help with engagement
Read full review
  • Skype is a RESOURCE hog. People who have limited bandwidth will have poor call quality.
  • It is hard to figure out how to use emojis and upload images in the chat.
  • The background images do not fool anybody....it is clearly not your real background.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
I have given this rating as this need to give more than that as it's very helpful for us and makes our work more efficient and fast.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft Teams Rooms really 'cleans up' the old clunky way to deliver a meeting. Too often we've seen issues with scheduling and staff not confident to use the equipment in front of an audience. Microsoft Teams Rooms has provided all the tools our staff need and didn't know that they needed and provides them in one familiar solution.
Read full review
Skype is not as good as Facetime in terms of ease to glance at it and figure out how it works. I think that's a result of Skype trying to be too many things at once. A lot of the menu and UI could be streamlined, and I would jettison some of the additional functions that have been tacked on over the years to simplify. That being said, while some options are slightly hard to find, they all work flawlessly once found.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I am not aware of the current support level for Skype for business, as I have never used even though I have the product. However, the support for Skype's personal paid users is not where it could be. Users who pay for Skype features do not have a clear path to reach out to support. So, rating 6, can be better as soon as I need to use Skype for business support and get a good experience. I will say that I will renew Skype for Business subscription, which is a significant inconsistency on my end. The explanation is that Skype for Business comes bundled with Office for Business, with no additional cost, so why not.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
It can be used on the phone via mobile application as well as on the desktop by logging in to the website. Easily installed and ready to use.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft Teams Rooms has been more cost effective for us than using a separate subscription from another vendor. With our microsoft 365 tenant already in-place we've streamlined our configuration and licensing into a single management portal which really suites us and the way in which we work as an organization. Managing meetings is just so much better through Microsoft Teams Rooms than any of our experiences with other vendors.
Read full review
Selected Skype because it was the only platform that was available for such purposes for video conferencing or audio conferencing. Since Microsoft, the tech giant, backed it, it was assured that it would work great in terms of productivity, with utmost security measures for all data, conversations, work materials, and personal information.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We save time in transportation having more online meetings.
  • We save resources doing webinars for our customers without paying additional licenses.
Read full review
  • Skype has contributed to increased efficiency for remote collaboration, especially now due to the ways things are and having so many remote employees. Without this tool, or any collaboration tool, business could not move forward.
  • I think Skype is the cost effective solution also between it and the other competitors out there. I'm not privy to the exact costs, but it strikes me as the cheaper option.
  • The only negative impact I would say is its lack of functionality and customization for larger organizations or groups that have employees spread out or require inter-departmental collaboration.
Read full review
ScreenShots