TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    MindTouch

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AMindTouch is a customer experience management platform with content management and help authoring capabilities. Formerly known as MediaWiki, it is optimized for building knowledge bases for customer self-service and agent assistance purposes.N/A
    Pricing
    MindTouch
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    MindTouch
    Free Trial
    Yes
    Free/Freemium Version
    No
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Yes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    MindTouch
    Considered Both Products
    MindTouch
    Chose MindTouch
    I will be brief. DealerTeam is built upon Salesforce and we try to support native apps. We used Desk.com first for basic Help Ticket management. The product did not satisfy how our customers were looking for information. We upgraded to Service Cloud with Knowledge Base and …
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    MindTouch wasn't the cheapest option we considered, but it was the best value. It gave us the most features, controls, flexibility, and growth opportunity for the money we paid for it. We did not need a ticketing solution, and a lot of the offerings we evaluated were stronger …
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    MindTouch is user-intuitive and mobile-friendly
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    We considered:
    • Home-built solution
    • Self-hosted solution using out-of-the-box libraries for API documentation
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    SDL's product at the time did not elegantly handle content other than DITA.
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    In my view, MindTouch is hands down the industry leader when it comes to documentation and publishing products. None of the other products I have used provide such an intuitive interface for single-source content creation. MadCap Flare has a steep learning curve and requires …
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    Actually, when we evaluated MinfTouch it was evident that we didn't really need to perform due diligence against other solution providers. It was apparent from the get-go they were the perfect fit for the problems we were trying to solve.
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    We selected MindTouch after being given assurances it met all of our needs. Whilst I am sure it can do this, it was not made apparent the technical ability required to be able to achieve this and given the choice again we would not have selected MindTouch.
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    Each suite offered a variety of features; however, MindTouch had powerful SAP integration and as a hosted solution the value of ownership was nearly immediate. Put on top of the API and CSS options for customization MindTouch was the top solution for our documentation …
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    MindTouch offers a unique knowledge and information management tool that was different enough from traditional knowledge bases and advanced enough to not be a Wiki while allowing CRM integration and APIs for customization. MindTouch as a company is focused on making their …
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    We compared MindTouch to Salesforce Community and Salesforce Knowledge and we ultimately picked MindTouch because of the increased usability.
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    MindTouch was the first and only product we used, so I do not know what other companies provide services similar to MindTouch.
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    We have not used a competing alternative, and are still working to better implement this solution.
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    We were on Salesforce.com's KB and did not like the interface and the difficulty with article creation. The advantage of SF was that we could assign articles to individuals for review. I feel that is missing with MindTouch. It makes article creation workflows very difficult.
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    I did not select MindTouch at my current company, but I was looking into it at my previous position. It has many of the useful features of the more traditional publications tools (RoboHelp, Frame) with the ease of web deployment of other tools (HelpIQ). It has some limitations …
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    We selected MindTouch because:
    - it could support multiple products inside of one instance
    - it could support both external and internal users with conditionalized access to content
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    We previously used MadCap Flare. Flare is amazing for its single sourcing capabilities, where MindTouch is lacking. But with Flare we had to do an entire build and publish each time (which took hours).
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    We looked at Happy Fox, Salesforce Communities, Fuze, MadCap Flare, etc. MindTouch won out because of its Salesforce integration and the fact that it was a hosted solution with everything included in one price.
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    We selected MindTouch because it had the most features for what we were looking for in our solution.
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    N/A. It has been several years since I evaluated competitors. I'm vaguely aware of Zendesk and am in process of evaluating not - not with the intention to replace MindTouch, just to keep up with trends in the industry. I would consider a move if I ever felt that MindTouch was …
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    MindTouch has a high degree of user freedom regarding customization, offers a quick-responding support team, and keeps their site up-to-date and modern. The combination of these abilities made MindTouch a fine choice that could suit our needs.
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    We evaluated various knowledge base options and previously used a home-grown site for documentation. Mindtouch had more options than we knew were possible and provided a more robust product.
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    We used Parature a long time ago but we left that system due to increasing costs and we moved to SFDC and WordPress. For a few years we used WordPress which was very difficult to manage especially for managing images, page redirects and overall longterm maintenance of content.
    Incentivized
    Chose MindTouch
    MindTouch is not as sophisticated as those editors but MindTouch is the only one that generates HTML. The other editors provide additional, advanced functionality, are more bulletproof, and require the services of an experienced technical writer. MindTouch, however, is simpler …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    MindTouch
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.6
    (110 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.8
    (18 ratings)
    Usability
    7.5
    (29 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (10 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.8
    (31 ratings)
    Online Training
    8.8
    (5 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.7
    (10 ratings)
    Configurability
    5.0
    (5 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    1.4
    (3 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    9.3
    (4 ratings)