Modern Campus CMS vs. OpenText Web CMS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Modern Campus CMS
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Modern Campus CMS (formerly Omni Campus) is a CMS for institutions of higher education. It can be deployed as a cloud-based service or hosted locally. It is built in Java, uses open standards, and is extensible through APIs.N/A
OpenText Web CMS
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Web CMS (TeamSite) accelerates and simplifies the end-to-end digital content and campaign lifecycle, from content creation and rich media management to omnichannel publication, optimization, automation, commerce, and community. According to the vendor, with TeamSite, users can: Capture diverse digital audiences with amazing brand experiences – Give customers and prospects consistent, high-quality brand experiences across devices and channels, and foster closer…N/A
Pricing
Modern Campus CMSOpenText Web CMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Modern Campus CMSOpenText Web CMS
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Modern Campus CMSOpenText Web CMS
Considered Both Products
Modern Campus CMS
Chose Modern Campus CMS
I think the visual editing and version control. If the CMS server is down the website is still live because of content independent of the server.
Chose Modern Campus CMS
Using OU Campus allows us to have a professional, modern-looking website that can be updated to stay current with the times.
Chose Modern Campus CMS
During the RFP process, we also evaluated Hannon Hill Cascade and Terminal Four. Both CMS systems had pros and cons, but overall, OU Campus was an easy choice. The features were better, non-technical users liked the simplicity of the interface, and the price was competitive.

We …
Chose Modern Campus CMS
We selected OU Campus after reviewing a number of CMS products and are extremely happy.
Chose Modern Campus CMS
Before using OU Campus Content Management System we were using Adobe's DreamWeaver suite for creating and maintaining web pages. The core web development environment was cumbersome to set up. Non-tech people also had trouble understanding how the web works and how web pages are …
Chose Modern Campus CMS
I don't know how OU Campus stacks against other products because I have been using OU Campus while I have been employed at my university.
Chose Modern Campus CMS
MUCH easier to use than other CMS systems. Quite intuitive. Pleasant interface. Reduces anxiety for beggining users of cms system, and supports stronger users comfortable doing more.
Chose Modern Campus CMS
I have evaluated Ektron, PHP Nuke, Drupal, Joomla!, typo3, Reason and SharePoint. OU Campus outshines all of these in the web CMS space. The OU Campus interface is more intuitive, more user-friendly, and the system itself is more flexible and scalable and capable in almost …
OpenText Web CMS
Chose OpenText Web CMS
It offers more content editing features at a relatively low cost thus overall deployment is lower in cost. It has great customer support who are always there to support and answer to our needs thus making the process of deployment seamless at every stage and offering training …
Chose OpenText Web CMS
OpenText TeamSite has been more powerful and resourceful as compared to Storyblok. The cost of deployment was relatively low and it has more content editing features. The customer support team members are always online 24/7/367 and they offer the best training of working with …
Chose OpenText Web CMS
It offers an intuitive user experience, modern, versatile and consistent in performance. It simplifies the whole process of managing the digital experience across all marketing channels, which is done from a unified interface. This tool has enabled us to take control of our …
Chose OpenText Web CMS
OpenText went through an RFP process against IBM Content Management back in 2012. OpenText not only met our business and technical requirements, but we asked both vendors to show a use case and OpenText provided an extensive solution that IBM could not. Also the content …
Chose OpenText Web CMS
Elasticsearch is scalable, ready for cloud deployments, and documentation is readily available and comprehensive.

Our using HP Autonomy is based on the sunk cost fallacy.
Features
Modern Campus CMSOpenText Web CMS
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Modern Campus CMS
10.0
Ratings
21% above category average
OpenText Web CMS
8.6
Ratings
6% above category average
Role-based user permissions10.00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Modern Campus CMS
9.3
Ratings
20% above category average
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
Ratings
4% above category average
API8.60 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language10.00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Modern Campus CMS
8.9
Ratings
14% above category average
OpenText Web CMS
8.0
Ratings
4% above category average
WYSIWYG editor9.20 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness9.20 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Admin section9.20 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Page templates9.60 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Library of website themes10.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design8.80 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Publishing workflow9.20 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Form generator6.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Modern Campus CMS
8.8
Ratings
18% above category average
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
Ratings
7% above category average
Content taxonomy9.20 Ratings7.90 Ratings
SEO support8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Bulk management8.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions9.00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Community / comment management9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Modern Campus CMSOpenText Web CMS
Small Businesses
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Modern Campus CMSOpenText Web CMS
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.4
(0 ratings)
3.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Modern Campus CMSOpenText Web CMS
Likelihood to Recommend
This website works well in an academic setting. It's easy to add pages as your site expands/grows. It's really easy to use and modify pages once you know what you're doing, but it can be a little tricky to get the hang of it at first. It is definitely useful to have in-person or virtual training before you dive in.
Read full review
OpenText TeamSite is well-suited to large, enterprise-wide implementations where customization, content governance, and dynamic content distribution is needed or prioritized. It is probably not ideal for smaller sites with simple architecture and few resources to manage custom implementation.
Read full review
Pros
  • Assets are easily managed and can be edited independently of the page they exist on.
  • Version history is handled well. Allows for a comment section to note what changes have been made.
  • Dependency tags are perfect for media that is used in several places. Upload a photo once, use it in multiple places, edit the photo or its description in one place.
Read full review
  • Offering compelling experiences to customers, which help in improving satisfaction
  • Information is delivered across multiple channels
  • Testing relevant result sets to improve the rate of website conversion
Read full review
Cons
  • OU Campus could use some improving on their upload changes as far as naming the document because when you are trying to upload the same document with minor revisions, OU Campus requires you to change the name of the document within OU Campus which creates multiple documents in the workfolder.
  • When naming documents to upload into OU Campus, it would be nice if we could name out documents the way we would instead of having to put an underscore to indicate a space in the document. Most users of OU Campus has not had proper training to know that you need to do that.
Read full review
  • I have recommendation for improvements.
  • It is easy to work with all the features.
  • All necessary content management tools are included.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I don't work at the college any longer, but I believe they will renew the license for the OU Campus Content Management System because of all the great benefits they have had since they initially deployed it. The system is very intuitive and easy to use. Department leads love it. The IT department also loves it because it saves them a lot of time and resources.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Once you've been training how to use it, it's really easy to use it on a daily basis
Read full review
Overall, it's a solid package with the potential to offer much functionality with appropriate resources applied. There are a few issues with the authoring interface that OpenText should address before its a top shelf authoring experience.
Read full review
Support Rating
The support at OmniUpdate is one of the reasons we continued with the company when time for renewal of contract.
Read full review
Our technical resources engage with OpenText TeamSite so I don't have direct experience. However, critical issues that we need help with seem to get the attention they deserve without issue. However, training and user resources for business owner roles are a bit lacking and some annoying issues with the authoring interface should be addressed sooner.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
The support team at OmniUpdate is available to assisting campuses with implementation
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I think the visual editing and version control. If the CMS server is down the website is still live because of content independent of the server.
Read full review
It offers more content editing features at a relatively low cost thus overall deployment is lower in cost. It has great customer support who are always there to support and answer to our needs thus making the process of deployment seamless at every stage and offering training for working with their product.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Increased satisfaction with user experience. OU Campus has made it easier for us to address problems when they arise, making our website more efficient.
  • Role-based control. Our old CMS made it very easy for users to change fonts and colors on their sections, which was very detrimental to the overall brand. That's not a problem anymore.
  • Reduced training times. OU Campus is so easy to use, I've been able to cut training times down by half.
Read full review
  • We integrated with google analytics, now we have the proper comprehension of our audience data reception and behaviors - we've greatly improved on personalized marketing.
  • Quick publication of content across the main digital channels.
  • We run our digital campaigns swiftly.
  • We've maintained our brand consistency for three years.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Modern Campus CMS Screenshots

Screenshot of OU Campus in-context editingScreenshot of OU Campus forms managementScreenshot of OU Campus user dashboardScreenshot of OU Marketplace: one-stop shop for OU Campus modules and cost-free gadgets