TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    MongoDB

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AMongoDB is an open source document-oriented database system. It is part of the NoSQL family of database systems. Instead of storing data in tables as is done in a "classical" relational database, MongoDB stores structured data as JSON-like documents with dynamic schemas (MongoDB calls the format BSON), making the integration of data in certain types of applications easier and faster.

    $0.10

    million reads

    Neo4j

    Score9.8 out of 10
    N/ANeo4j is an open source embeddable graph database developed by Neo Technologies based in San Mateo, California with an office in Sweden.

    $65

    per month

    Pricing
    MongoDBNeo4j
    Editions & Modules
    Shared
    $0
    per month
    Serverless
    $0.10million reads
    million reads
    Dedicated
    $57
    per month
    Aura Professional
    $65
    per month
    Community Edition
    Free
    Enterprise Edition
    Contact Sales
    Aura Free
    Free
    Aura Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    MongoDBNeo4j
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsFully managed, global cloud database on AWS, Azure, and GCP—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    MongoDBNeo4j
    Considered Both Products
    MongoDB
    Chose MongoDB
    There are use cases for both relational and non-relational databases. MongoDB is simply a different method of storing data, but I find it to be faster and more intuitive than relational models.
    Incentivized
    Chose MongoDB
    - Mongo had a query language
    - Mongo could be run easily on my laptop
    Incentivized
    Neo Technologies
    Chose Neo4j
    Neo4j is a graph store and has different use cases compared to another NoSQL Document store like MongoDB. MongoDB is a bad choice when joins are common as existing operators for joining two documents (similar to tables in a relational store) as Mongo 3.5 use SQL like join …
    Incentivized
    Chose Neo4j
    • For easy query language and better graphical representation on small dataset
    • Also easy to set up and handle on the server.
    • On top of that Neo4j also provides an API support to interact through any system.
    Incentivized
    Chose Neo4j
    Neo4j is ahead of any of the leading competitors I know. The only one which comes close, in my opinion, is the "Titan-Distributed Graph Database" which is completely open source and free to use. Titan works on top of Apache Cassandra so it has some huge learning curves to do, …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    MongoDBNeo4j
    NoSQL Databases
    Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of MongoDB and Neo4j
    Feature
    MongoDB
    10.0
    39 Ratings
    Neo4j
    -
    Ratings
    Performance10.039 Ratings00 Ratings
    Availability10.039 Ratings00 Ratings
    Concurrency10.039 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security10.039 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scalability10.039 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data model flexibility10.039 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility10.038 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Ratings
    MongoDBNeo4j
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (79 ratings)
    2.1
    (9 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (67 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (15 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    Availability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.6
    (13 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.4
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)