| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 MongoDB | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | MongoDB is an open source document-oriented database system. It is part of the NoSQL family of database systems. Instead of storing data in tables as is done in a "classical" relational database, MongoDB stores structured data as JSON-like documents with dynamic schemas (MongoDB calls the format BSON), making the integration of data in certain types of applications easier and faster. | $0.10 million reads |
 MarkLogic Server | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | MarkLogic Server is a multi-model database that has both NoSQL and trusted enterprise data management capabilities. The vendor states it is the most secure multi-model database, and it’s deployable in any environment. They state it is an ideal database to power a data hub. | $0.01 per MCU/per hour + 0.10 per GB/per month |
| MongoDB | MarkLogic Server | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Fully managed, global cloud database on AWS, Azure, and GCP | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| MongoDB | MarkLogic Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | Chose MarkLogic Server Because Hadoop cannot parse the XML and Json files as marklogic does Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose MarkLogic Server In comparison to both Mongo and HBase, MarkLogic wins in terms of integration to other systems, while loosing in terms of pricing. In terms of documentation all will be in same range putting MarkLogic a bit forward. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose MarkLogic Server MarkLogic is good at what it does: storing and searching XML with a REST interface. The amount of support out there for the other NoSQL products is what gives them the best advantage. Many plugins exist for those, none exist for MarkLogic. Even the proprietary ones like … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose MarkLogic Server There's no other single product that directly compares to all the features that are packed into MarkLogic. Generally speaking, you're looking at a combination of many products to build a stack that competes feature-for-feature. Even if you're leveraging only a limited set of … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose MarkLogic Server I have used most of the common RDBMS databases (SQL Server, Oracle, MySQL, etc.). MarkLogic is more dependable, faster, and flexible. I would not willingly go back to RDBMS. As far as open source competition to MarkLogic such as MongoDB, I haven't used it myself so I don't have … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose MarkLogic Server We had Fast in place when Microsoft had bought it up and was going to change / deprecate it. One of the biggest advantages of MarkLogic for search actually had to do with the rest of the content pipeline - it allowed us to have it all in one technology. On the NoSQL side, we … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| MongoDB | MarkLogic Server | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NoSQL Databases |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MongoDB | MarkLogic Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | 7.0 |
| Usability | 10.0 | 9.0 |
| Availability | 9.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 9.6 | 9.0 |
| Implementation Rating | 8.4 | - |
