mRemoteNG vs. SecureCRT

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
mRemoteNG
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
mRemoteNG is a fork of mRemote, an open source, tabbed, multi-protocol, remote connections manager.N/A
SecureCRT
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
SecureCRT provides secure remote access, file transfer, and data tunneling for everyone in your organizatiom.N/A
Pricing
mRemoteNGSecureCRT
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
mRemoteNGSecureCRT
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsContact vendor for pricing/licensing information
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
mRemoteNGSecureCRT
Considered Both Products
mRemoteNG
Chose mRemoteNG
Every now and then I do look to see if there is any other software that can bring together multiple remote access protocols in a single interface that can contain multiple connections to remote devices with image scaling to mage use of a windowed interface and have yet to find …
Chose mRemoteNG
mRemoteNG is far more useful than LogMeIn when on the same network, or VPN as the servers, as it allows multiple server screens open in multiple tabs. LogMeIn is much more useful when working out of the office for its ability to connect anywhere, but each system accessed is in …
SecureCRT

No answer on this topic

Features
mRemoteNGSecureCRT
Remote Administration
Comparison of Remote Administration features of Product A and Product B
mRemoteNG
7.9
Ratings
3% below category average
SecureCRT
-
Ratings
Screen sharing8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
File transfer5.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Over-the-Internet remote session9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Remote management of servers & workstations10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Remote Active Directory® management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized management dashboard8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Annotations7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring and Alerts9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-platform remote control5.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
mRemoteNGSecureCRT
Small Businesses
Getscreen.me
Getscreen.me
Score 9.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Remote Desktop Manager
Remote Desktop Manager
Score 9.0 out of 10
PRTG
PRTG
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Remote Desktop Manager
Remote Desktop Manager
Score 9.0 out of 10
PRTG
PRTG
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
mRemoteNGSecureCRT
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
mRemoteNGSecureCRT
Likelihood to Recommend
mRemote is well suited if you need to manage multiple types of servers and/or network devices. Instead of opening a dedicated Putty session and having to manage all of the windows, mRemote can handle all of this with different tabs. If you only have a few devices (less than 10), mRemote could be overwhelming for the need and not quite match up with what you are needing.
Read full review
SecureCRT is well suited for any environment that has a back-end network configuration or in a system administration environment. The ability to configure devices via CLI is the best place where we can use SecureCRT. Configuring network changes and taking backup of network devices is a prime example of SecureCRT being used.
Read full review
Pros
  • Tabbed Views. Each server remote desktop is viewed in its own separate tab, similar to a web browser. This makes it much quicker and easier to switch between them than using separate windows.
  • Storing credentials. You can configure it with log on credentials for each system, saving time on accessing as you don't need to enter a password each time.
  • Multiple connection types. I use the traditional RDP the most, but mRemoteNG allows many different connection types, similar to Putty.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Sadly not seeing much in the way of active development these days.
  • Have had a few issues where the config file has been messed up (so learnging to back that up was key).
  • Interface is functional but not pretty and can be a bit clunky at times.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
It's very easy to setup and use. The tree structure organizes the multiple connections in a hierarchical manner which makes it easy to browse and the tabbed browsing make it simple to switch between multiple ongoing connections You can even export the list of connections and import it to another setup.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Never actually needed to use support so have no idea - honestly it's simple enough to use I'd be surprised if anyone really needs support with it.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
mRemoteNG is far more useful than LogMeIn when on the same network, or VPN as the servers, as it allows multiple server screens open in multiple tabs. LogMeIn is much more useful when working out of the office for its ability to connect anywhere, but each system accessed is in a separate window making navigation a little tricky. Sometimes I use them in tandem however, LogMeIn to access a machine in my network, then mRemoteNG to access multiple machines from there!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Very easy to hand over connections to new starters.
  • Having multiple remote protocols in one place is a massive time saver.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots