MySQL vs. SAP HANA Cloud

MySQL

971 Reviews and Ratings

SAP HANA Cloud

923 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
MySQL	Score8.1 out of 10	N/A	MySQL is a popular open-source relational and embedded database, now owned by Oracle.	N/A
SAP HANA Cloud	Score8.9 out of 10	N/A	SAP HANA is an application that uses in-memory database technology to process very large amounts of real-time data from relational databases, both SAP and non-SAP, in a very short time. The in-memory computing engine allows HANA to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk which means that the data can be accessed in real time by the applications using HANA. The product is sold both as an appliance and as a cloud-based software solution.	$0.95 per month Capacity Units

Pricing

MySQL

SAP HANA Cloud

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
MySQL	SAP HANA Cloud
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

No setup fee

Optional

—

Includes a one year free trial.

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	MySQL	SAP HANA Cloud
Considered Both Products	Oracle No answer on this topic	SAP Verified User Chose SAP HANA Cloud - SAP HANA has much better performance as it offers the power of in-memory computing. - SAP HANA is very well suited for analytics and data warehousing; we also have SAP BW on HANA. - MySQL is not suited for data warehousing and analytics; doesn't offer the power of in-memory … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SAP HANA Cloud Really, it is appropriate for any kind of company. For everyone to be successful and make wise business decisions, effective data analytics are essential. Any research analytics firm can benefit greatly from it. It won't be of much use to a modeling agency; instead, a business … Incentivized Helpful? Paulo Moreno Business Development Manager at Mitel (Telecommunications, 1001-5000 employees) Chose SAP HANA Cloud This has helped to keep a close eye on our entire data silos to get intelligent analytics and other indicators. During its use, we had also gone for other options but we realize that this is most suitable for us that's why we permanently picked this. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SAP HANA Cloud As SAP HANA is built into memeory, the proformance of the product is hard to beat against it's rivals but that comes with a price. You can get away with using another product but you'll be losing out else where. For example in time/multiple systems and efforts to relplicate … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SAP HANA Cloud Similar to other big DBMS, but better or equal at stability and technical maintenance. Better or equal at documentation. There is room for improvement at SQL path analyzing. Incentivized Helpful? Shiv Shivakumar Acquisitions Leader in Information Technology at Abbott (Computer Software, 1001-5000 employees) Chose SAP HANA Cloud We compared Microsoft BI with SAP HANA. The reasons to go with SAP HANA were - 1. ability to ingest data into HANA from a non SAP database 2. in-memory database resulting in faster real time analytics 3. ability to scale up 4. ability to replicate data real time 5. very solid … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic

User Ratings
	MySQL	SAP HANA Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend	9.3 (135 ratings)	9.4 (292 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	9.9 (4 ratings)	9.1 (6 ratings)
Usability	8.0 (7 ratings)	9.1 (10 ratings)
Availability	- (0 ratings)	3.6 (1 ratings)
Performance	- (0 ratings)	3.6 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	8.6 (2 ratings)	9.1 (252 ratings)
Implementation Rating	8.0 (1 ratings)	9.1 (2 ratings)
Configurability	- (0 ratings)	3.6 (1 ratings)
Ease of integration	- (0 ratings)	4.5 (1 ratings)
Product Scalability	- (0 ratings)	4.5 (1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	- (0 ratings)	4.5 (1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale	- (0 ratings)	3.6 (1 ratings)