N-able N-central vs. Noction Flow Analyzer

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
N-able N-central
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
MSPs and IT professionals use N-able™ N-central® to monitor and manage devices and complex networks remotely. N-central provides visibility and efficiency as the user's needs scale. N-central can help users: 1. Proactively monitor everything on a customer network—not just servers and workstations—and troubleshoot. 2. Stay on top of threats with features like MFA, antivirus, integrated endpoint detection and response, data backup, disk encryption, email protection,…N/A
Noction Flow Analyzer
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Noction Flow Analyzer (NFA) is a flow-based monitoring and reporting software that collects, stores, and presents both real-time and historic traffic data across an entire network. It helps to analyze and understand a network’s traffic patterns, bandwidth utilization, hosts and applications traffic anomalies, better capacity planning, and a lot more. NFA allows for detailed BGP peering analysis, provides insights into potential security issues, and allows engineers to minimize network…
$299
per month
Pricing
N-able N-centralNoction Flow Analyzer
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Noction Flow Analyzer
$299.00
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
N-able N-centralNoction Flow Analyzer
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsNFA licensing is simple, transparent, and upfront. There is no limit on the number of devices, interfaces, or sites that can be added to the system. Free updates to new releases and premium 24/7 support are available to all NFA users. BGP Data is delivered as an optional add-on to Noction Flow Analyzer at $199/month.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
N-able N-centralNoction Flow Analyzer
Considered Both Products
N-able N-central
Chose N-able N-central
Most advanced, and other technicians in the business already used it before. NinjaOne was a close competitor, but lacked some features that we ideally need. ITarian was too basic but was MUCH cheaper. For a startup MSP, it would be much more attractive. Splashtop was just for …
Chose N-able N-central
Tried another MSP software provider however the cost was not justified.
Chose N-able N-central
I selected N-able N-central as I liked the idea of easy-to-work with pricing that integrates with other PSAs (specifically Connectwise PSA aka Connectwise Manage). I did not succeed with that. I'd use any of the other tools instead. The integration is problematic as the default …
Chose N-able N-central
Our version of SolarWinds was old and running on old hardware, but it was way easier to setup and do things with. It did not do everything N-able does such as patch management, or at least we didn't have a module to do so if one existed. However it definitely seemed easier to …
Chose N-able N-central
In regards to the above, they are more concentrated on Cybersecurity and AV management whereas N-able N-central covers these areas but has the added advantage of IT management, whereby the IT environment can be managed directly from N-able N-central
Chose N-able N-central
N-able N-central was cheaper than Connectwise RMM as the poor NOC monitoring inflated costs but was not useful. Kaseya VSA was terrible contracts and poor product all around.
Chose N-able N-central
NinjaOne has been a breath of fresh air. Moving away from N-Able to NinjaOne has been the best decision we've made in this department.
Highly recommend.
Chose N-able N-central
In my eyes, if I could I would have switched to automate, but this is a distant second or third.
Chose N-able N-central
N-Central has automation manager, which allows you to automate multiple tasks, thereby saving time and effort through Automated patching. AV and Backups are built into the system, and can be deployed by checking a box. It's easy to update and keep secure. File transfer and …
Chose N-able N-central
Solarwinds seemed less complicated and less expensive and would have the least impact on our staff as far as training and setup time.
Chose N-able N-central
I feel it's much more robust then Kaseya which is the only other RMM solution I have tried. I like the remote support and the fact that in N-central I can deploy patches at the click of a button.
Chose N-able N-central
It's much pricier than other remote support fools.
Chose N-able N-central
SolarWinds N-central is on the more unique side of tools because it can do so many things, and do most of them quite well. For patching, it is much easier to use than SCCM. In terms of monitoring, it is not great out of the box and requires tweaking to take full advantage. …
Chose N-able N-central
All three systems integrate with Connectwise Manage. All systems have integration to active directory. Automation does configuration deployment better. Ninja is a SaaS, N-central is a Saas, whereas Automate is on-premise. Automate is more scalable. Pricing and seat deployment …
Chose N-able N-central
Automate has the best scripting engine. There is no conversation there, the scripting is taken to another level. N-central and VSA both have the ability to run scripts, but Automate runs away with it. Automate also has the best remote access tool. VSA and N-central remote …
Chose N-able N-central
With Bomgar there are codes and/or a website that the user has to login to before we can connect remotely. N-central allows us to click on the machine and log in. We can set it to prompt the user to accept the connection, or on some computers, we can just log right into it.
Chose N-able N-central
We chose SolarWinds N-Central because of the integration with ConnectWise Manage, it allows us to automatically create tickets and helps us be more efficient. We really liked the engineers that were able to coach us in migrating from our old system and teach us all the best …
Chose N-able N-central
N-Central has all of the features of previous software I have used all rolled into one package. I can push software and check anything and everything about every machine on our network in one place now instead of multiple interfaces and programs. N-Central saves us time and …
Chose N-able N-central
Overall, for the Average MSP, none of the RMM solutions is going to be perfect, they will all have their strengths and weaknesses and N-Able is no exception. It is a great solution if you are looking for something that is not super cryptic to use and want something relatively …
Chose N-able N-central
Since I came in to manage the product, we have only tested one other product. The main reason for not switching was that it would take a considerable amount of time and resources to convert everything to a new service. Additionally N-able's interface, while it does have much …
Noction Flow Analyzer

No answer on this topic

Features
N-able N-centralNoction Flow Analyzer
Monitoring Tasks
Comparison of Monitoring Tasks features of Product A and Product B
N-able N-central
7.4
Ratings
0% below category average
Noction Flow Analyzer
-
Ratings
Remote monitoring9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Network device monitoring8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Management Tasks
Comparison of Management Tasks features of Product A and Product B
N-able N-central
9.0
Ratings
19% above category average
Noction Flow Analyzer
-
Ratings
Patch Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
N-able N-centralNoction Flow Analyzer
Small Businesses
Panda Systems Management
Panda Systems Management
Score 9.8 out of 10
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Intermapper
Intermapper
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
TeamViewer
TeamViewer
Score 8.5 out of 10
Cisco Meraki Dashboard
Cisco Meraki Dashboard
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
N-able N-centralNoction Flow Analyzer
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
N-able N-centralNoction Flow Analyzer
Likelihood to Recommend
In my opinion, N-able N-central is a good "learn your lesson and move onto something better" tool. I've used many RMM tools over the years and I feel that this one is slow, does a terrible job with reporting, alerting, monitoring, software deployments, etc. The ability to turn on services like AV, backup, etc easily is cute, but you're not going to be able to use your own tools with this easily. In my experience, if you do turn those tools on for testing during the trial, you'll be charged later (despite it being a trial). They also turn off your ability to monitor these increased costs or to turn them off yourself. As a company, I found that they were impossible to work with. The sales team is right there if you want to buy something - but if you need anything other than to buy something, in my experience, they take days or weeks to navigate. I found that they are not a terribly ethical company and are more concerned with making a few dollars than creating a partnerships with MSPs. I can see value is in the advertised price of $99 for a hundred endpoints. However, you need to remember to not trial any other tools (like AV, backup, etc).
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Robust patch management: it is easy to set up patching groups via tags, and configures patch management profiles and maintenance windows.
  • Remote Control: as long as the agent checks in, it is very quick and easy to take control of an endpoint, either in a separate session (RDP, kick the current user out), or to join the existing session of the current user, to provide desktop support or collaborate remotely.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Expensive software
  • The support team are terrible
  • Sales team will promise the world to get you over the line
  • Subscription management is tedious
  • Old software with very little development and the support team will not provide any further information on this - no roadmap
  • Integrations galore - but none of them are effective
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Overall we have liked our solar winds experience, however, as our company has grown to support larger enterprises, this product does not have the functionality that our teams need in order to fully support them. The lack of granularity with backups and lack of ability to support nutanix environments is slowly drawing us into the use of other tools.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The user interface is fairly straight forward, with logic groupings for objects. I did not deploy this software, but am one of the daily administrators. Once you get the correct agent package (Which can be a challenge) the integration into AD is not bad. The UI could be more customized, but that may have been a design choice.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Every time we have reached out to SolarWinds they are quick to respond, even offering support chat 24/7. Their support team is great and works with you to find solutions to issues. They have taken items we had issues with before and used those to create updates so that the issue is handled better in the future.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Make sure if you your using a vm you follow the instructions for provisioning to the letter or it will be starting from square one
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Most advanced, and other technicians in the business already used it before. NinjaOne was a close competitor, but lacked some features that we ideally need. ITarian was too basic but was MUCH cheaper. For a startup MSP, it would be much more attractive. Splashtop was just for remote connections, which we used for some time before realizing full RMMs were a better fit for our requirements.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • The product definitely increases productivity. Technicians can spend a few seconds to take care of remote tasks with a few clicks as opposed to minutes to get a user to start a remote control session, or worse, going on site to work on a piece of equipment.
  • The packaging of the features makes selling and pricing the product fairly straight-forward and convenient. This saves our sales team time from trying to work with add-ons when pricing our services - the product makes it easy to just have an "all you can eat" package at a set price.
  • When something goes wrong with the product, our business and our customers suffer. If for example, a bug causes all managed computers to reboot, our customers call in, resulting in our technicians being booked solid doing damage control. This also causes loss of trust with our customers - we can't simply blame the product, the customer trusts us to provide them a service and if the product fails, we fail.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

N-able N-central Screenshots

Screenshot of N-able N-central DashboardScreenshot of Remote desktop access with Take Control

Noction Flow Analyzer Screenshots

Screenshot of Complete, up to the minute network traffic visibility on bandwidth usage, conversations, subnets, traffic usage by application, traffic distribution by locations, top prefixes, top ASNs, and more.Screenshot of Comprehensive Alerting system with a multitude of utilization, duration, and frequency threshold-based alerts delivered via individual notification channels such as email or a specific Slack channel.Screenshot of Detailed BGP analysis capability, to find peering candidates and make informed interconnection decisions, diagnose policy misconfigurations, route flapping, or other peering related issues.