NameScan vs. NICE Actimize

It has advance automated tool which leverage machine learning to deliver an expansive range of information retrieval , showing accurate result with good speeds. It is tool to tack the to the footprints of each & every entity available in the internet . Some time we get the information which come with false positive but after dong some fine-tuning information will get corrected.

Incentivized

Most of the firms that use this tool range from the biggest banks to budding financial firms. It provides custom solutions to garner the business needs and regulatory requirements which are continuously becoming complex needs for all. It is also a gradually evolving tool/product adding more and more solutions and features down it road to constantly be able to deliver to the client needs.

Incentivized

• Single Dashboard Solution for all Quires
• Easy Integration with System
• Competitive Price

Incentivized

• The overall UI is very clean and friendly. The operations team will find the RCM Dashboard very useful and easy to operate while the analytics team will have no problem working on the policy manager for creating new fraud detection rules.
• Ene to end fraud solution. Cover Card fraud, Remote Banking, Deposit fraud, Employee fraud and commercial banking.
• The ability to use Actimize internal scoring system and creating additional custom scoring system . Integrating both in fraud detection scenarios.

Incentivized

• The software still generates confusion, especially in the case of Asian names, often repetitive or similar to each other. In this case, the information it returns is not very accurate.
• The numerous integrative databases that can be purchased are really very expensive.
• NameScan is graphically unintuitive.

Incentivized

• Not as much as I can think of

Incentivized

Based on the information from other university colleagues, it seems that NameScan is a more reliable and complete software than others of the same category. However, as already mentioned in another answer, the software NameScan remains a little weak in verifying the identity of people from states where names are frequently repeated.

Incentivized

As a fraud prevention consultant i worked both with Actimize IFM And Fico Falcon.
For Card Fraud (debit/credit) Falcon has an advantage, but on the end to end fraud Actimize is a better investment.

Incentivized

• It allowed us to limit the admission of non-welcome people to the University.
• It has allowed us to limit the number of frauds in the context of thesis discussions, especially doctoral ones.
• NameScan has become fundamental in our university's internalisation to verify, in particular, people arriving from countries at risk.

Incentivized

• Increased employee efficiency.

Incentivized