Net-Results

Net-Results

29 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Net-Results	Score8.1 out of 10	Small Businesses (1-50 employees)	Net-Results is a marketing automation solution that features segment-driven approaches to lead management and marketing automation. Some key features include support for A/B email testing, drag & drop landing pages, CRM integrations, and automated marketing workflows.	$800 Annual agreement, up to 25,000 Contacts or 60,000 Sends

Pricing

Net-Results

One Price Full Platform: $800
Annual agreement, up to 25,000 Contacts or 60,000 Sends

Pricing Offerings
Net-Results
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

No setup fee

Tiered pricing by total email sends or total contacts, you decide. All features included. No upsells or limitations based on your price.

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Net-Results
Considered Both Products	Net Results Todd Last Marketing Systems Analyst in Marketing at KEY2ACT - WWW.KEY2ACT.COM (Computer Software, 51-200 employees) Chose Net-Results We've used ClickDimensions and Marketo. We felt that ClickDimensions was more limited as far as creating effective email campaigns and not as easy to use. It also is completely native to Dynamics CRM, which can be a positive and a negative. Marketo was the previous solution … Incentivized Helpful? Joel Babbitt Benefit Coordinator/VEBA Plan Administrator in Sales at IPPFA Benefits (Financial Services, 1-10 employees) Chose Net-Results Net-Results is easier to use and we have been able to format emails that are more functional and look better. Incentivized Helpful? Samantha Caldwell Marketing and Sales Manager in Marketing at Prospective Payment Specialists (Hospital & Health Care, 11-50 employees) Chose Net-Results Constant Contact was great for what it was. We were wanting to see who was visiting our website and be able to get more leads that way. When we found out that Net-Results offered email marketing as well it made sense to use that. Creating, building and sending the emails to our … Helpful? Ryan Limpert V.P. in Corporate at Rycor Medical Inc. (Medical Devices, 11-50 employees) Chose Net-Results Act-On and HubSpot - We believe Net-Results was a better overall value for similar features. Helpful? Anthony Fischer Business Development in Sales at teXium (Telecommunications, 11-50 employees) Chose Net-Results We also looked into Act-On, but Net-Results just had that something. Helpful? Michael Martin Executive Vice President of Sales in Sales at teXium (Telecommunications, 11-50 employees) Chose Net-Results Just a better team and stronger overall value. Helpful? Jordan Fraczek Marketing Manager in Marketing at Brainsell Technologies LLC (Computer Software, 11-50 employees) Chose Net-Results Net-Results is much better than a lot of marketing platforms on the market. Helpful? Verified User Chose Net-Results Marketing automation at its core has become very standardized. While most platforms can easily compete with one another it is difficult to ignore the small company factor when it comes to top-notch support. Net-Results cares a great deal about your success and do what they can … Helpful? Tom Symoens Managing Director in Corporate at The CRM Warehouse (Computer Networking, 1-10 employees) Chose Net-Results Act-On and Marketo because of Sugar integration. We found Net-Results offering best value. Helpful? Kris Patel Director of Strategic Planning and Social Media in Marketing at Zig Marketing (Marketing and Advertising, 11-50 employees) Chose Net-Results Net-Results is 10X more powerful than HubSpot, which to us was a basic marketing automation implementation that focused only on top of funnel acquisition. Net-Results is structured for the marketing automation power user whereas Pardot is structured for the generic marketing … Helpful? Norman Pracht Head of Webmecanik in Marketing at Eureos (Internet, 1-10 employees) Chose Net-Results Net-Results is much easier to use, I'd say some other softwares can be guesswork. All the features of the big marketing automation softwares are included in Net-Results. And don't even try to compare prices! Helpful? Erika Cannon Partner in Marketing at Rally Prospecting (Marketing and Advertising, 1-10 employees) Chose Net-Results We selected Net-Results because they aren't too big to not care about their customers. They work with our company on an individual basis, integrating our systems so that, working together, we are more efficient and effective. The mammoth companies wouldn't care whether we … Helpful? Ken Barber VP of Marketing in Marketing at The Search Monitor (Internet, 11-50 employees) Chose Net-Results --Priced much much better than the big dogs in the industry, and similar to platforms with much fewer features --Support is excellent and includes phone support, which the others didn't --Doesn't need to take over your blog and host it on their site, like others do. Helpful? Verified User Chose Net-Results Net-results is more cost effective and you feel like you really get to know the team. This is not a big organization feel, but they have a lot of power. Helpful? Christine Magnuson Director of Digital Marketing in Marketing at Hilco Industrial, LLC (Machinery, 51-200 employees) Chose Net-Results Net-Results was far more customizable and able to integrate with our website than any other solution. It is more intuitive than Strongmail and more powerful than Constant Contact. Blue Hornet didn't offer this level of integration. Helpful? Cliff Limpert President in Corporate at Rycor Medical (Medical Devices, 1-10 employees) Chose Net-Results Initially, we made inquiries with other providers. It seemed they were either too large, or too small. Net-Results provided a team responsive to our specific needs, without having to tolerate a voicemail hockey game with each inquiry. I am able to contact the appropriate … Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic

Features

Net-Results

Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Net-Results
Feature	Net-Results 7.1 23 Ratings
WYSIWYG email editor	7.021 Ratings
Dynamic content	7.214 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content	7.311 Ratings
Landing pages	7.019 Ratings
A/B testing	6.311 Ratings
Mobile optimization	5.022 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting	8.023 Ratings
List management	7.022 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences	8.618 Ratings

Comparison of Lead Management features of Net-Results
Feature	Net-Results 7.6 20 Ratings
Lead nurturing automation	8.518 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading	8.418 Ratings
Data quality management	5.018 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks	8.616 Ratings

Comparison of Campaign Management features of Net-Results
Feature	Net-Results 7.5 15 Ratings
Calendaring	7.99 Ratings
Event/webinar marketing	7.015 Ratings

Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Net-Results
Feature	Net-Results 6.3 22 Ratings
Dashboards	7.021 Ratings
Standard reports	6.022 Ratings
Custom reports	6.019 Ratings

Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Net-Results
Feature	Net-Results 7.5 20 Ratings
API	7.015 Ratings
Role-based workflow & approvals	8.08 Ratings
Customizability	7.019 Ratings
Integration with Salesforce.com	7.99 Ratings
Integration with Microsoft Dynamics CRM	7.03 Ratings
Integration with SugarCRM	8.17 Ratings

User Ratings
	Net-Results
Likelihood to Recommend	8.0 (25 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	9.0 (4 ratings)
Usability	7.5 (3 ratings)