NetBrain Technologies vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

Although there are many products in the market that provides very simple and easy fault and performance monitoring metrics in notification format, reports and emails etc However NetBrain is a specialized tool when it comes to network issues troubleshooting for various kind of scenarios such as multicasting issues in a site can be detected live and bottle neck can be highlighted by a simple click of troubleshooting button.

Incentivized

If there is any organization who is having more then 10-15 firewalls and from different vendors, Tufin Orchestration Suite can be best suited there as it can manage all the firewalls from one single pane of glass and push the policy, and get the Standard based compliance reports for the rules created on the firewalls.

Incentivized

• Network discovery
• Config comparation
• Runbooks

Incentivized

• If you set your zones correctly Tufin will create your network topology map.
• You can find which object or rule you want easily for all firewalls in the network.
• Tufin provides more features for Checkpoint.

Incentivized

• After every release one or the other things stop working
• API call to create INC's in SNOW,Remedy

Incentivized

• Tufin SecureChange needs to be more agnostic, easy to integrate with Service NOW
• JSON payload identification for Tufin SecureChange while integrating it with SNOW
• customization should be made more easy, like custom dashboarding
• Tufin Orchestration Suite Professional services experience could be also improved overall - Taking more ownership
• API calls to 3rd party tools should be more flexible

Incentivized

This is a easly tool that i've worked.

Incentivized

The others were cumbersome, slow and there is a huge learning curve for the installation, configuration and just daily monitoring. NetBrain was the easiest of all to setup then let it run and build our network and map it out. Once it was complete, we immediately identified several circuit issues that we were unaware of within our network. With the maps and information gained, we were able to present to [management] and prove a case that we needed larger circuits in several areas.

Incentivized

1) Fairly okay overall but definitely needs improvement overall Vs the other products available in the market like Palo Alto XSOAR 2) Cost wise okay at the beginning but when client demands add-ons/ more features/customization tailored to their needs, Tufin Orchestration Suite recommends RFE / custom costs/development costs 3) USP feature is cool to use overall Vs FireMon 4) Tufin ProServ needs to buckle-up/Support compared to other competitors in the market

Incentivized

• Network automation is up to date.
• Quicker failure discovery and resolving due to the path discovery.
• Less time spent on documentation.
• Much more details in the documentation.

Incentivized

• Tufin has helped increase firewall migration time letting us build new policies instead of migrating garbage in
• Tufin helps to identify who changed what when so if a change impacts access Tufin can help find what change was made from a single location
• Tufin has a great reporting feature - except for Palo Alto right now - that helps to review and audit policy, flagging overly permissive and shadow or partially shadow policies.

Incentivized