Netgate TNSR vs. Sophos Firewall

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Netgate TNSR
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
TNSR is an open-source based high-speed packet processing platform from Rubicon Communications, LLC (Netgate).N/A
Sophos Firewall
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Sophos XG Firewall provides comprehensive next-generation firewall protection powered by deep learning and Synchronized Security. Sophos Firewall supplies insights and exposes hidden user, application, and threat risks on the network, and say the product is differentiated by its ability to respond automatically to security incidents by isolating compromised systems, with Security Heartbeat™.N/A
Pricing
Netgate TNSRSophos Firewall
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Netgate TNSRSophos Firewall
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Netgate TNSRSophos Firewall
Considered Both Products
Netgate TNSR

No answer on this topic

Sophos Firewall
Chose Sophos Firewall
Since we already utilize the Sophos Endpoint and its tight integration into their firewall, it was a no brainer to go with it.
Chose Sophos Firewall
Very simple to manage, several features, and a report included.
Chose Sophos Firewall
We decided to use Sophos XG Firewall because it is a reliable and reputed cybersecurity product.
Chose Sophos Firewall
We selected the Sophos Firewall because of its comprehensive security, ease of use, Scalability and increase the productivity.
Chose Sophos Firewall
We have been a Sophos customer for the most part but i have seen some other offerings from SonicWall, Barracuda, and Cisco. While they all offer nice products, we've always been content with our Sophos XG firewalls, especially as they release more and more features/etc.
Chose Sophos Firewall
I was a big fan of Cisco ASA products, but when I saw all of the security feature differences between both firewalls, I moved to Sophos devices. Its sandbox, IPS, and many more features are really advanced. Cisco does not provide features like this.
Chose Sophos Firewall
Cisco ASA is not [a] true next generation firewall if you want to protect from 7 layers and malware attacks then you need firepower services but this service is very costly. In Sophos all the advanced security features are [less] cost[ly].
Chose Sophos Firewall
Sophos XG Firewall provides easy integration with Active directory & LDAP Servers so that we can implement single sign on (SSO) for users. Also the content filtering & inspection feature protect us from bad actors.
Chose Sophos Firewall
The firewall that was in use at the first location before expanding was a cheaply made open source box that couldn't do much even as a basic firewall. We had looked at various companies but came to the conclusion that Sophos was the right fit for us and it has been that way for …
Chose Sophos Firewall
It is to very little surprise that we selected Sophos UTM at our first use. Then, we upgraded to XG Firewall and the operation is very smoothly done.
Features
Netgate TNSRSophos Firewall
Firewall
Comparison of Firewall features of Product A and Product B
Netgate TNSR
-
Ratings
Sophos Firewall
9.5
Ratings
10% above category average
Identification Technologies00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Visualization Tools00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Content Inspection00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Policy-based Controls00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Active Directory and LDAP00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Firewall Management Console00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Reporting and Logging00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
VPN00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
High Availability00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Stateful Inspection00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Proxy Server00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Netgate TNSRSophos Firewall
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

pfSense
pfSense
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
F5 BIG-IP
F5 BIG-IP
Score 9.2 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
F5 BIG-IP
F5 BIG-IP
Score 9.2 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Netgate TNSRSophos Firewall
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Netgate TNSRSophos Firewall
Likelihood to Recommend
Netgate TNSR would be most suitable if you are in need of fast application traffic and quick packet processing. What I like most about Netgate TNSR is that the network interfaces no longer get cut in half or encrypted traffic hauled so you are able to work on your projects swiftly on stable connections. You will however have to make time to familiarize with the command line interface for quick commands.
Read full review
It is well-suited for small, medium, and large organizations looking for comprehensive cybersecurity protection. It will not only safeguard their network from cyberattacks but also provide them with many advanced features like deep packet inspection, centralized management, web filtering, application control, etc. in one place. It will help them optimize bandwidth and ensure continued connectivity.
Read full review
Pros
  • Has very fast connection setups
  • I've never experienced packet processing latencies while using the software.
  • It's easy to monitor the routers via SNMP
Read full review
  • Web filtering. This allows us to monitor web usage and block certain categories from being access at the perimeter.
  • Application Control. With application control we can block certain applications that get categorized from working accessing the Internet.
  • Synchronized Security. When utilizing the Sophos Endpoint product you can use Synchronized Security to minimize Lateral Movement in a network. If a machine is shows a Red status you can auto-isolate it and it is unable to communicate with anything else on the network.
Read full review
Cons
  • Took me a while before I completely got a hold of the complex command line interface.
Read full review
  • If using Endpoint security and the Firewall it would be nice to have an easier back and forth between the portals rather than have two separate tabs open. Especially if using more than one in multiple locations.
  • If dealing with different revisions options are moved around and sometimes in places that doesn't normally seem like they should be there.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Because this is a user-friendly interface, and anyone can use it there are multiple articles and guidelines available, it has advanced-level security features. they provide VPN solutions all the features are very practical, SSID MAC-based authentications web control, Firewall rules segregation of the rules and policies, On-premises Active directory single sign-on feature is also available.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
As we are all addicted to graphics-oriented interfaces for all our life products. Easy to manage and access as a good way of using anything
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
I was a big fan of Cisco ASA products, but when I saw all of the security feature differences between both firewalls, I moved to Sophos devices. Its sandbox, IPS, and many more features are really advanced. Cisco does not provide features like this.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We deploy the third party hardware on AWS with great flexibility
  • Fast packet processing
  • Superb router performance without needing ASICs.
Read full review
  • True UTM device.
  • Very Active customer help for any help.
  • Easy license and cost effective.
  • Should [do] more work on logging and reporting.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Sophos Firewall Screenshots

Screenshot of Sophos Firewall v17.5 Control Center