Netpeak Spider vs. Siteimprove

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Netpeak Spider
Score 7.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Netpeak Spider is a desktop tool which crawls a website like a search engine robot and detects key SEO issues that influence the website’s visibility in SERP. According to the vendor, this tool allows users to: Spot 80+ issues of your website optimization. Check 70+ key on-page SEO parameters. Calculate internal PageRank to improve website linking structure. Analyze all incoming and outgoing internal links. View page…
$19
per user
Siteimprove
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
The Siteimprove platform offers tools used to create digital experiences optimized for quality, accessibility, analytics, and SEO. Sitemprove offers content insights and recommendations in a prioritized list to improve the impact of changes. It is available through three solution packages (Inclusivity, Content Experience, and Marketing Performance).N/A
Pricing
Netpeak SpiderSiteimprove
Editions & Modules
Standard (1-month subscription)
$19.00
per user
Pro (1-month subscription)
$39.00
per user
Standard (12 months subscription)
$182.40
per user
Pro (12 months subscription)
$374.40
per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Netpeak SpiderSiteimprove
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup Fee$15.90 per userNo setup fee
Additional DetailsStandard Plan includes all basic features except access to white-label reports. Pro Plan gives you all basic features and access to white-label reports.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Netpeak SpiderSiteimprove
Considered Both Products
Netpeak Spider
Chose Netpeak Spider
We choose Netpeak Spider because:
1. Can buy a monthly subscription and have unlimited number of websites to check.
2. Price. It's affordable, especially when you have not only one project.
Siteimprove
Chose Siteimprove
Siteimprove helps complement other SEO tracking tools by providing a different view of metrics and greater visibility into KPIs.
Chose Siteimprove
I prefer Siteimprove to all above for their easy to view and use dashboards. The visual aspect of SiteImprove makes it easy to pick up for everyone - as we have experienced in our team. We've only had 1 training session on it, as opposed to the multiple for the other things we …
Chose Siteimprove
The ability to take the raw data and put it into a user-friendly format.
Chose Siteimprove
Siteimprove provides richer features when it comes to how granular you can define policies and metrics for search engine optimization and content relevance. It is also much easier to set up and maintain the sites that you want to administer. However, pricing wise is more costly …
Chose Siteimprove
These tools allow you to make your site accessible without affecting its performance or design at all!
Chose Siteimprove
Compared to any other tool I've used, Siteimprove is the best. Many tasks that I used to do manually have become more accessible and faster due to it. The visual scanning of issues is what makes it the best. It's simple to find problems, fix them, and track how far we've come. …
Chose Siteimprove
I do like Siteimprove, but we are moving on to Monsido purely for costs. Monsido costs a third less than Siteimprove and offers the same functionality.
Chose Siteimprove
This was a replacement to IBM Policy Tester.
Chose Siteimprove
We have used or tested other tools that get installed on a computer or that are hosted online, but none of them offer the features that come with Siteimprove. TotalValidator Pro will check your site for accessibility issues, but it is a manual check and there is no historical …
Chose Siteimprove
In terms of WCAG, accessiBE is the more value oriented product with easy to understand results, less false positives, better WCAG results. That said, it's also a single focused tool, whereas Siteimprove is geared towards overarching web governance. There are simply no other …
Chose Siteimprove
Siteimprove is superior to Ahrefs due to it's clean and intuitive user interface and seamless navigation. Ahrefs contains a more robuts data set but the information is often difficult to locate and take action on because of how it's displayed to users. Siteimprove has less data …
Features
Netpeak SpiderSiteimprove
SEO
Comparison of SEO features of Product A and Product B
Netpeak Spider
9.0
Ratings
15% above category average
Siteimprove
-
Ratings
Page grader8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Site audit / diagnostics10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
SEO Channels
Comparison of SEO Channels features of Product A and Product B
Netpeak Spider
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
Siteimprove
-
Ratings
Mobile SEO8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Global SEO9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
SEO Platform & Account Management
Comparison of SEO Platform & Account Management features of Product A and Product B
Netpeak Spider
10.0
Ratings
17% above category average
Siteimprove
-
Ratings
Multi-domain support10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Analytics
Comparison of Web Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Netpeak Spider
-
Ratings
Siteimprove
7.4
Ratings
8% below category average
Lead Conversion Tracking00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Bounce Rate Measurement00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Device and Browser Reporting00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Pageview Tracking00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Event Tracking00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Reporting in real-time00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Referral Source Tracking00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Customizable Dashboards00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Netpeak SpiderSiteimprove
Small Businesses
Nozzle
Nozzle
Score 10.0 out of 10
StatCounter
StatCounter
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Advanced Web Ranking
Advanced Web Ranking
Score 8.2 out of 10
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Dupli Checker (DupliChecker.com)
Dupli Checker (DupliChecker.com)
Score 8.5 out of 10
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Netpeak SpiderSiteimprove
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Netpeak SpiderSiteimprove
Likelihood to Recommend
[Netpeak] Spider is a great service for:
  • Checking and monitoring big websites or e-commerce projects for technical errors on regular basis
  • Creating custom formulas for calculation of internal page ranks and building a tree view with this information
  • Get reports that include metrics for every page (performance, inbound and outbound links, indexing status)
  • Create reports that include all metrics from external SEO services like Serpstat or Similarweb for every single page of your website
It's very useful software for SEO or marketing agencies that have a lot of projects to work with, but might be overkill for small projects and companies.
Read full review
Simple, easy-to-deploy accessibility that automatically scans, remediates and provides proof of compliance once the process is complete. It is ideal for people who want to make their website much more accessible and provide their users with an intuitive adjustable interface.
Read full review
Pros
  • Crawling data and metrics from every webpage on website (page structure, titles, meta tags, Google GTM & Analytics presence)
  • Building tree with calculation of internal page ranks
  • Get a report with different technical errors (404 errors, broken links, duplicated content, )
  • Performance report. Check out your page load time, server response time, extract metrics from Google Page Speed Insights
  • Checkout different metrics from external services like Serpstat, Similarweb (page ranks, keywords, traffic, etc.) for single page
Read full review
  • User-friendly customisable dashboards, easy to make a dashboard from a template, or create your own, and add in whichever 'widgets' are relevant for what you are looking at
  • Flagging words to review, allowing users to check and confirm if the word is 'accepted' or is a misspelling
Read full review
Cons
  • You can buy a subscription only for month or more, you can't pay for 1-2 projects
  • No version for MacOS
  • It's only desktop software, online version is not available
Read full review
  • I don't like that there are different navigation paths to go from point A to point B. When I want to navigate to a specific place, I have more than one way to get there, which means I have to make a decision about how I want to there and I'd rather the designer make that design based on what would be most efficient for me.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Tool has undergone numerous changes, both to function and UX/CX. Makes it less than user friendly at times. But on the other hand, that does indicate a willingness to improve the product in a continual manner - which they've done nearly year after year - but it's always a case of who moved my cheese with each new iteration.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I've used support often and it has been responsive, thorough and considerate of our needs. I can get a tech right away, they understand the issue, and work with us to resolve it. Often the problem is with the site we are trying to scan, sometimes it is with their product. I appreciate that they go beyond support into continually helping us implement SiteImprove in more places with 3rd party integration.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We choose Netpeak Spider because: 1. Can buy a monthly subscription and have unlimited number of websites to check. 2. Price. It's affordable, especially when you have not only one project. 3. Frequent updates. With every update functionality is expanding (latest update for example brought a lot of new integrations). 4. Quality of reports. They are very detailed and have everything we needed for our work.
Read full review
Siteimprove provides richer features when it comes to how granular you can define policies and metrics for search engine optimization and content relevance. It is also much easier to set up and maintain the sites that you want to administer. However, pricing wise is more costly which can be a constraint for smaller organizations.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Get a full report with common technical errors on websites without manual QA testing
  • Speed up work of SEO specialist, can automatically calculate tree with internal page ranks
  • It's all-in-one tool and you don't need to buy another services to get all this info
Read full review
  • Siteimprove has helped bring our accessibility scores up from middling to near-perfect.
  • Siteimprove has helped reduce our broken links, style violations and misspellings.
  • Siteimprove's heatmaps have helped us make the case for enforcing best practices on the website among key stakeholders.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Netpeak Spider Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of