TrustRadius

NGINX Ingress Controller vs. Podman.io

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
NGINX Ingress Controller
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
NGINX Ingress Controller is a traffic management solution for cloud‑native apps in Kubernetes and containerized environments.N/A
Podman
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Podman is a daemonless container engine for developing, managing, and running OCI Containers on Linux Systems. Containers can either be run as root or in rootless mode. Podman is open source and free, supported and maintained by the Containers organization, with code available from GitHub.N/A
Pricing
NGINX Ingress ControllerPodman.io
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
NGINX Ingress ControllerPodman
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
NGINX Ingress ControllerPodman.io
Considered Both Products
NGINX Ingress Controller
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose NGINX Ingress Controller
We are already using NGINX which is so reliable, it definitely lends weight to our decision to select NGINX Ingress Controller. Also, even though it is a little more complex to manage, NGINX Ingress Controller definitely have a richer feature set, better performance, caching, …
Podman
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Podman
Podman is Daemonless, lightweight and doesn’t charge us for commercial usage, so it’s a relief for startups. Minikube and Rancher are a bit more complex for our use cases; so we keep things simple, fast and secure with Podman that can easily be managed with Podman Desktop and …
Features
NGINX Ingress ControllerPodman.io
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
NGINX Ingress Controller
7.8
Ratings
1% above category average
Podman.io
10.0
Ratings
26% above category average
Security and Isolation7.50 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Discovery Tools8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
NGINX Ingress ControllerPodman.io
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.6 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
NGINX Ingress ControllerPodman.io
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
NGINX Ingress ControllerPodman.io
Likelihood to Recommend
Best suited if we have to manage external traffic inside your Kubernetes cluster and want to use granular control to your applications.
AS
Amit Setia
Senior Engineer]
Read full review
While it always depends on your use case, I believe security concerns of need for root user is a concern, so it is worth considering daemonless container service over Docker, which works just as good and has support for docker compose. Another good reason is the licensing for enterprise usage, which podman has no restrictions for. It’s also a great choice for OpenShift integration, which is seamless and works well with Rancher as well.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
  • Provide access to containers
  • Manage traffic
  • Route traffic
  • Lightweight
  • Near to zero downtime
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • It’s daemonless, so somewhat more secure.
  • It works exceptionally well and is compatible with Docker compose
  • Podman Desktop actually makes individual usage also pretty easy.
  • It can be used as Docker alternative with almost no additional steps
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
  • Its not related to Ingress functionality but certificate management with cloud vendor would be a feature i would like to see.
AS
Amit Setia
Senior Engineer]
Read full review
  • Podman desktop is getting more stable with each version, but does need more UX friendliness as well.
  • Official support for development tools and IDEs is missing for most tools
  • It works well with Kubernetes, but I wouldn’t mind additional improvements
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We are already using NGINX which is so reliable, it definitely lends weight to our decision to select NGINX Ingress Controller. Also, even though it is a little more complex to manage, NGINX Ingress Controller definitely have a richer feature set, better performance, caching, traffic management among other features which was why it was chosen.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Podman is Daemonless, lightweight and doesn’t charge us for commercial usage, so it’s a relief for startups. Minikube and Rancher are a bit more complex for our use cases; so we keep things simple, fast and secure with Podman that can easily be managed with Podman Desktop and other works with our docker-compose based projects without issues.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Security is one of the best objective which we achieve with NGINX Ingress
  • Cost optimization is one of the business objective
AS
Amit Setia
Senior Engineer]
Read full review
  • We definitely feel more secure.
  • We do not suffer from memory or cpu overuses as it uses fedora coreOS which is lightweight
  • We do not have to worry about license payments for our basic usages.
  • It’s open source so quick fixes imminent with maximum transparency.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots