NGINX vs. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 NGINX | Score9.2 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | NGINX, a business unit of F5 Networks, powers over 65% of the world's busiest websites and web applications. NGINX started out as an open source web server and reverse proxy, built to be faster and more efficient than Apache. Over the years, NGINX has built a suite of infrastructure software products o tackle some of the biggest challenges in managing high-transaction applications. NGINX offers a suite of products to form the core of what organizations need to create… | N/A |
 Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox) | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (ACS) for Kubernetes is a Kubernetes-native security platform, equipping organizations to more securely build, deploy, and run cloud-native applications. The solution helps protect containerized Kubernetes workloads in all major clouds and hybrid platforms, including Red Hat OpenShift, IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service, Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS), Microsoft Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS), and Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE). | $0 per month |
| NGINX | Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| NGINX | Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| NGINX | Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.8 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 | - |
| Usability | 9.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.1 | - |