Nitro Productivity Suite combines electronic signature and general PDF editing, from Nitro, Inc. It is built around capabilities such as getting approvals and esignatures in seconds and sharing and reviewing documents from anywhere.
$9.99
per month billed annually per user
VeriDoc Sign
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
A blockchain-secured eSignature solution utilising VeriDoc Global’s patented verification technology. A unique digital fingerprint of the document is stored on the blockchain and can’t be edited or tampered with. VeriDoc Sign allows companies to leverage blockchain
technology to secure eSignatures. The solution is designed to improve efficiency by eliminating long wait
times to print, sign, scan and send documents. The software requires no coding,
existing software or special hardware.…
Nitro Productivity Suite is able to perform just as well as Adobe. It uses less resources on my machine than Adobe. I think it is much easier to use than Tungsten as well.
Every 1-2 years will do a check on current PDF options to include trialing the software. Have tried Foxit and several that seem to have failed in the marketplace. Over the last 4 years, I have always stuck with Nitro. Unfortunately, we still need to keep Adobe Acrobat (free …
I think Adobe is probably the best PDF solution since they essentially developed and own the PDF format, but Nitro is a very good alternative and is more competitively priced.
If our clients didn't use PDF documents or sent us everything in MS Word, then our Office 365 would be …
Nitro Productivity Suite allows a user to accomplish all of the things you would want to do to a document that Adobe does not. Much easier to find the operation you are looking for in Nitro Productivity Suite compared to Adobe
At the time, we evaluated Adobe Professional to help with some of the PDF modifications we were needing to accomplish. I didn't see any further options besides Nitro and Adobe that were worth evaluating. When looking at costs and feature comparisons it was a no-brainer.
I downloaded the trial versions of both Acrobat DC and Nitro PDF, and found Nitro to be superior in price, while Acrobat was superior in software features and user-friendliness. I knew I would be using Nitro for basic publishing and editing of PDFs, which both programs do well, …
We selected Nitro PDF because the features that the organization needed were comparable and the annual cost for the on-premises version of the application was considerably less expensive at the time. When we selected, Adobe was not yet in the cloud. At that time, there were …
Cost factor stood out as our initial requirement was very basic while we evaluate 3 products. Also the signature creating process seemed to be easy and smooth compared to other products. However I was not heavily involved in the evaluation process.
One thing that VeriDoc offers that Docusign does not is the ability to verify your documents, this added level of security is something that I really like it. I am hoping for a mobile version of VeriDoc soon; However. I also love being able to see my documents in real time so …
VeriDoc Sign help us manage multiple users and reviewers to any single contract document. We do not have to worry about authenticity and traceability of the document. These features are not available in docusign or Adobe Acrobat. Unlike other softwares VeriDoc Sign is on …
Adobe turned out to be better, since instructions, training and support are more plentiful and easier to find. VeriDoc Sign was not as intuitive to learn and was missing some key features, which made Adobe comparatively more efficient and a better value despite the higher price …
I have used DocuSign for years and years. The one thing that Veridoc makes better is the UI system. DocuSign is very confusing and can be a bit complicated when you have many many users that need to sign and return packet. VeriDoc Sign simplified the process so i can just send …
We use DocuSign and VeriDoc Sign together. This allows us to verify the documents are true and accurate before and after they are signed via DocuSign. Previously, we had used DocuSign by itself.
VeriDoc Sign offers a minimal set of features that meet my needs and I am satisfied with that, as Docusign offers more features that I never use, and I am satisfied with the VeriDoc Sign, while Docusign features like scheduling are usually not needed by me and it seems more …
I run a professional services business from home. I need to edit documents quickly and easily and with minimal subscriptions to minimize overheads. I love that Nitro is a one-off payment to get a license to the software, and you can simply upgrade to the latest version if that's what you want, but you're not obligated to. I've been using the same version of Nitro for 7-8 years now. Despite the fact the upgraded versions have a lot of great, nice-to-have features, the version I'm on still does the job.
VeriDoc Sign is a tool with great potential. It has a lot of room for improvement as a product. This type of tool is for essential for any organization and therefore the product can do much better in terms of adding customer requirements. Right now, blockchain contract process has been such a relief for us and we have used this for all our contracts. Users are easily adopted as you can even sign your document by typing or drawing on the document. However, we need to add expiry dates for some contracts and there is no such option to do. Also you will need to send reminders manually if the parties have not signed or approved the documents submitted.
For the most part, the entire software is extremely easy to navigate and use. You won't need to follow tutorials or anything for the bulk of the core features, as it's all pretty seamlessly designed.
Nitro checks all the boxes for what we need. It is fairly priced, it allows us to read and edit PDF documents, convert PDF to MS Word and convert MS Word to PDF. It allows us to combine multiple files and do all the post processing like adding page numbers and adding headers and footers
Every 1-2 years will do a check on current PDF options to include trialing the software. Have tried Foxit and several that seem to have failed in the marketplace. Over the last 4 years, I have always stuck with Nitro. Unfortunately, we still need to keep Adobe Acrobat (free version) installed to view a small percentage of some PDFs we receive.
VeriDoc Sign offers a minimal set of features that meet my needs and I am satisfied with that, as DocuSign offers more features that I never use, and I am satisfied with the VeriDoc Sign, while DocuSign features like scheduling are usually not needed by me and it seems more advanced for me.
Positive - Allows us to modify PDF documents from our clients to submit our proposals.
Positive - Allows us to convert PDF documents to MS Word to share with our consultants and others without a PDF editor who contributes to our proposals.
Negative - Need to upgrade to get the latest features/versions unlike something like MS/Office 365 where we just get updates automatically and free for the monthly fee. Maybe they will or need to move to a subscription solution versus a product price.