TrustRadius

Nolio Release Automation vs. Spinnaker

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Nolio Release Automation
Score 6.4 out of 10
N/A
Nolio Release Automation (formerly CA Release Automation) is a release deployment management option from Broadcom company CA Technologies, a dynamic application deployment tool that regulates and speeds app delivery across the enterprise—enabling zero-touch deployments from development to production.N/A
Spinnaker
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Spinnaker is an open source continuous delivery platform with a range of cluster management and deployment management features, originally developed at Netflix.N/A
Pricing
Nolio Release AutomationSpinnaker
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Nolio Release AutomationSpinnaker
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Nolio Release AutomationSpinnaker
User Ratings
Nolio Release AutomationSpinnaker
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Nolio Release AutomationSpinnaker
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Spinnaker is a strong solution for Continuous Deployment being able to manage enormous environments in an easy way. Even Spinnaker being able to manage environments based on cloud instances (ec2 for example) I believe it is more suitable for containerized environments. Mainly in Kubernetes where it excels as a reliable and safe tool
Erlon Sousa Pinheiro | TrustRadius Reviewer
Erlon Sousa Pinheiro
Senior Devops Engineer
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • The immutable way of deployment is one of its greatest advantages.
  • We have a strict policy to restock our instances with new images very frequently and this can be done very seamlessly via Spinnaker
  • Rollback/ resize of clusters is one of the coolest features of Spinnaker.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Integration with external authentication mechanism is not that simple.
  • Its configuration is made by a external tool (halyard). Would be better if we could configure it by using its own frontend.
  • Its user interface is some times a bit confusing.
Erlon Sousa Pinheiro | TrustRadius Reviewer
Erlon Sousa Pinheiro
Senior Devops Engineer
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
• Pipeline Expressiveness • Self-Service/Override • Visibility of Client Teams • Operability of Client Teams - • High-Quality Integrations (AWS, IHP, Google) • Extensibility – (Ability to add code) • The maturity of Deployment Process • Speed/Ease of Onboarding
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • It's open source!
  • RPM based deployments can be scripted at Maven file itself , so very easy!
  • RPM based deployments bundles all code and configs together, so awesome!
Debajit Kataki | TrustRadius Reviewer
Debajit Kataki
Sr. Devops Mgr. ( Tools, automations , Release Engineering/ CICD , AWS )
Read full review
ScreenShots