per month per provider with a required annual commitment
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
NueMD
Practice Fusion
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
NueMD
Practice Fusion
Considered Both Products
NueMD
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose NueMD
AdvancedMD has really good customer service. Something NueMD needs to improve a lot. NueMD's pricing is GREAT, and we got a lot more features for a fraction of AdvancedMD. Software wise we only used AdvancedMD's Practice Management, and there is not a huge difference between …
NueMD is easier to use and more reliable than Allscripts. Allscripts feequently had technical problems when we eere using it.
It is more economical and a better value than Athena. It has the same features at a much lower price.
Overall NUEMD is easy to use self explanatory and realtime helps alot when were are busy checking in patients, it gives you messages letting you know when something isnt right and that makes the claim we send out to the ins company cleaner to the return on payments from the ins …
The only other EMR I have used is EPIC. I worked as a scribe for PAMF, where I spent 50 hours a week in front of EPIC. I got to know it really well, and have used PF much less, so it is difficult to make a comparison. EPIC came with so many more options to view test results, …
It wasn't really a choice for me- I used the chiropractic specific when working for chiropractors and then used Practice Fusion while I was working for an alternative healthcare doctor. The doctors all had chosen the software before signing me on, there wasn't really an option …
NextGen is hard to use as far as medical records. Practice Fusion is user friendly. There is a great knowledge base for questions asked. Practice Fusion takes all the guess work out of the day.
Practice fusion is much more user friendly than the other programs that we have used. The more costly EMR's were definitely no better and the ones we have used were not nearly as easy to use. I would highly recommend practice fusion over Athena or Allscripts.
We only use NueMD for scheduling and following up with patient, and entering their information... so I will just focus on that. The software does its job, has all the required fields you want for scheduling a patient and to keep their info at an easy access. I do think they need improvement in the Reports feature and the "Back" tool. Some of the reports are really good, some won't ever load and would make the program freeze and crash and some are not even possible to run cause you don't have the option for some filters.
I think this is a great tool for a smaller practice, and I really like that it is not practice-specific. It seems like any type of doctor could use the site. I also think this is really great for remote workers because you are able to log on via the internet. I think that this tool would not be good for those looking to have a specific practice software. I've worked for other doctors alongside the one I used practice fusion for, and the other doctors used specialty specific software because of the customization to their job and charting.
One of the biggest frustrations is that PF only imports PDFs of lab results, but does nothing to allow manipulation of the numbers within these PDFs. I can pull up lab results but can't look at a graph, for example, of trends in serum sodium or hematocrit.
Like EPIC, it would be nice to have an option like scrolling to all the "***"s using F2, which I always try to do on PF until I realize it does not work.
I wish PF had more dot phrases to pull in things like lab results, etc., into the note. Since I cannot copy and paste lab results (which are stored in PDF) or blow them in with a dot phrase, I have to manually re-write them, which leaves our notes more vulnerable to human error. If this feature DOES exist, it isn't obvious to me or anyone in our clinic.
It would be really nice to hear from PF support to see if we had any unmet needs in the clinic so that they could educate us on how to better use this EMR to support those needs.
We always get a return call within the time stated. There are many available topics on the forum and it is often easy to find the issue you are seeking more information on. When we have tried the live chat feature we have been satisfied with the timeliness and response.
AdvancedMD has really good customer service. Something NueMD needs to improve a lot. NueMD's pricing is GREAT, and we got a lot more features for a fraction of AdvancedMD. Software wise we only used AdvancedMD's Practice Management, and there is not a huge difference between both software
The only other EMR I have used is EPIC. I worked as a scribe for PAMF, where I spent 50 hours a week in front of EPIC. I got to know it really well, and have used PF much less, so it is difficult to make a comparison. EPIC came with so many more options to view test results, visits to other health facilities, and past notes. It also had so many more ways you could format your notes, blow in data, and statistically analyze data. While EPIC is a much more comprehensive and well-supported EMR, it also would be too heavy and unnecessary for the small scale clinic work I do at a community clinic. I feel that each EMR has the environment they are well-suited for, and I am glad to be using PF now.