TrustRadius

Omnissa Intelligence

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Omnissa Intelligence
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
Omnissa Intelligence (formerly Workspace ONE Intelligence for Consumer Apps, or Apteligent Crittercism) is a Mobile APM and crash reporting tool. Its optimization for mobile environments allows it to handle the variety of configurations that come with mobile spaces, and can differentiate issues between applications and specific device environments (Android phone vs. iPhone vs. iPad, etc.). It automates issue detection and reporting, including how network issues impact application functionality…N/A
Pricing
Omnissa Intelligence
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Omnissa Intelligence
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
Additional Details—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Omnissa Intelligence
Considered Both Products
Omnissa Intelligence
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Omnissa Intelligence
I use both for different purposes. Twitter Fabric integration was easier for setup purposes and documentation was a lot clearer than Crittercism and geared towards Swift more so than Objective-C. Twitter Fabric is also better with real-time emails pointing to exact line number …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Omnissa Intelligence
A similar product we use is Conviva. I personally prefer Crittercism as Conviva seems to miss things fairly often. Critter tends to catch most issues as long as development has set the app up for it. I've had to reproduce issues several times before Conviva catches it whereas …
Best Alternatives
Omnissa Intelligence
Small Businesses
Sentry
Sentry
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Sentry
Sentry
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Dynatrace
Dynatrace
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Omnissa Intelligence
Likelihood to Recommend
9.8
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Omnissa Intelligence
Likelihood to Recommend
Crittercism is definitely, in my opinion, best for software testers/engineers. We are the faces behind proper app behavior. However, I'm sure there are other scenarios that would benefit from this program. Engineers should should use it prior to sending out builds to see if anything major is crashing or going wrong behind the scenes to diagnose the problem before going into testing/production
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
  • Identifying crashes users are experiencing.
  • Allowing us to see how many times the crash occurred.
  • Allowing us to see what times the crashes have occurred.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
  • Pointing to exact line number of the crash
  • A more explicit navigation bar (a little confusing for the user)
  • Third-party API specific crash reporting (instead of just listing the endpoint)
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I use both for different purposes. Twitter Fabric integration was easier for setup purposes and documentation was a lot clearer than Crittercism and geared towards Swift more so than Objective-C. Twitter Fabric is also better with real-time emails pointing to exact line number for a bug. Crittercism is better for bread crumb trails and stack traces to see the user flow and how a problem ending up becoming a problem in the first place.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Allow us to release iOS versions quicker to the app store
  • Help us solve bugs and view bread crumb trails on money-making actions within the API
  • Points us to problems in the stack trace with a direct correlation to our route creation aspect in the app
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots