OneLogin is an identity and access management (IAM) product from One Identity since the October 2021 acquisition, featuring single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication, provisioning, cloud directory, and more.
$4
per month per user
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
SailPoint Identity Security for the cloud enterprise manages risk from the explosion of technology access. The solution gives businesses visibility while automating and accelerating the management of all user identities, entitlements, systems, data and cloud services.
N/A
Pricing
OneLogin by One Identity
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Editions & Modules
Advanced (bundle)
$4
per month per user
Professional (bundle)
$8
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OneLogin by One Identity
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Aside from the bundle options, OneLogin offers its services a la carte, and therefore these prices can vary depending on your business's needs.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OneLogin by One Identity
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Considered Both Products
OneLogin by One Identity
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin has a lesser cost as compared to other solutions. It also has a successful POC, partner expertise, integration with in-house and cloud-based apps, and provides restriction of access from unauthorized devices. It is a secure solution with industry-standard encryption, a …
Okta was revolutionary for its time, but it wasn't as well polished as the OneLogin product. I do think that OneLogin has a more modern user interface as well as a more attractive platform. The use of colors clear delineation of security for multiple login flows is really …
I have not used any product similar to OneLogin, previously I had just been using the login on the sites themselves and having to use my browser to store my passwords in order to gain acces to the systems. The one good thing with OneLogin is that it will always have your most …
When our company used to use RSA SecurID, we had physical security devices for the two-factor security pin. If we wanted to remotely access an account from an unsecured network, we had to carry around an extra physical tag. While this was very secure, it was not convenient and …
This was the only vendor that we really evaluated. We use Lastpass in conjunction with OneLogin, but I believe that we're moving away from it and staying with OneLogin for the future.
With similar functionalities, OneLogin was the most cost effective solution. We also compared OneLogin to on prem open source solutions but we were worried about the management overhead that would be required by such systems. Cloud services like OneLogin were allowing to limit …
OneLogin was a better value than Ping and Okta, and it was more feature-rich than HelloID. The other products are fine, but OneLogin was the perfect balance of value and functionality for our organization.
OneLogin stacks up against Okta. Same product, different names. They both are a single sign-on tool and offer users the ability to auto sign in versus having to remember a kajillion passwords. Roll this out to your teams and you will make the teams' lives much easier. Click …
We chose OneLogin due to its many integrations, superior brand name, and an extremely competitive price point. We did not evaluate the other solutions beyond the superficial.
The customer was already using SailPoint Access Risk Management (ERP Maestro) and doesn't want to bring in SAP AC for the SOD topic. So it was easy to decide to go with SailPoint Access Risk Management (ERP Maestro).
SailPoint is a more customizable solution than Okta, it is also not just a cloud application. Our use of IIQ to manage external suppliers via Azure AD guest accounts was not available on other platforms at the point of deployment. The integration with SAP and other Microsoft …
The on-prem SailPoint IdentityIQ platform provides the necessary customization that is required in our dynamic environment. Although we may look at a cloud-based Identity Management service again in the future, (there are many advantages), our identity management, …
SailPoint and Oracle were selected for the RFP from a field of over 10 companies. SailPoint was much more mature and stable during our evaluation in 2015 and continues to lead the pack. We're confident we made the correct decision and work closely with our success team at …
I think SailPoint Identity Platform stacks better than most IAM tools and solution though a lot of SaaS IAM solutions are already available, can compete and are at par with its features and capabilities.
IdentityIQ provides a more complete solution for a fraction of the cost of other solution providers. It is easy to work with and provided very effective management of all aspects of the access management process.
All these products are really good at some key areas. They are all different and solve different parts of the puzzle. IIQ is more of a centric focal point that manages and maintains access in a vendor-agnostic way. It helps bridge the gap at the identity layer for different …
Compared to other solutions, IdentityIQ provides the best identity governance for your organization. Custom workflows and automation processes make this product more attractive to business rather than its competitors. IdentityIQ is a united, user-friendly platform to perform …
OneLogin definitely has a range of people it could work for. Everything from individuals who just want a better login process. Small companies who are wanting a way to keep a better count of who has access to what, and large corporations that want to implement a login process that will reduce the number of helpdesk tickets due to forgotten passwords.
We are happy with the management of the Id, accounts where the user can request any access easily. Also the many connector which Sailpoint is offering in order to onboard lots of applications is quite helpful. The access review module has also have been improve so that large campaigns can we work out easily.
Where we see some improvement is on the UI as here it is not so intuitive for the end user, so that we need to make lots of communications and training so that the user is able to understand how to use it.
For the administration and creation of roles it also would be great to have some improvements here to make it more easily its management.
The access request work flow and back end process is exceptional. It effectively manages all of the various pieces of a request and presents the completed request to the provisioning agent as a single record. This is very helpful to the efficiency of the process since the provisioning agent only sees the completed request rather than seeing each component as it is approved. Other systems deliver the various request components to provisioning as they are approved but cannot be provisioned without all the components. Thus creating complexity for the provisioning agent and impacting the SLAs with what looks like a delay with the provisioning process.
The system is robust enough to effectively handle the scale that we need. With 750+ applications, 24,304 individual entitlements to select from, and an average of 10,200 request transactions per month. We have never had any performance issues.
The system flexible enough to accommodate our complex business needs without needing to customize the base system. We have been able to add significant functionality to the system in order to support the business needs by extending the code rather than altering the base code. This has enabled a simple upgrade of the system without having to re-apply code enhancements.
Lack of administrative APIs for creating or setting up new connectors: This prevents the automated integration to federations and requires manual setup rather than discovery-based automated setup.
Customization of the interface: The potential configuration of the interface are still limited at the moment (logo, primary and secondary colors, background). This prevents the usage of the platform as a communication medium or to organize the space in a more standard fashion (for our institution)
There are some limitations with using the apps provisioning APIs that can lead to some termination or provisioning actions not being completed
Technical adoption requires a high level of training and experience by the implementing teams.
SailPoint and partners offers very good training courses which I think are very good. An area of improvement can be in providing cloud VMs that users can work with to learn the IIQ tool more effectively at their own pace.
OneLogin is very easy to use. The most complicated part is the user setup and even that is not difficult. After everything is working, using it day to day is trivial. All you have to do is have the application ready on your phone and you can use a single set of login credentials to access all of your tools securely.
There has never been an issue where I have needed to use the OneLogin support so it would be unfair to rate them anything other than a 10 on their ability to provide support. Like I said its a very basic platform that we use it for with no issues.
When our company used to use RSA SecurID, we had physical security devices for the two-factor security pin. If we wanted to remotely access an account from an unsecured network, we had to carry around an extra physical tag. While this was very secure, it was not convenient and make working remotely unappealing. Additionally, we would have to manually enter the security pin to gain access. OneLogin fixes both these concerns and makes Single Sign On security very easy to use.
SailPoint is a more customizable solution than Okta, it is also not just a cloud application. Our use of IIQ to manage external suppliers via Azure AD guest accounts was not available on other platforms at the point of deployment. The integration with SAP and other Microsoft services is also second to none.