OneSpan Sign (formerly eSignLive) is an e-signature solution for secure document signing processes that enables organizations to digitize business processes and eliminate costly paper and inconvenient “wet” signatures.
$0
Free for 30 Days
VeriDoc Sign
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
A blockchain-secured eSignature solution utilising VeriDoc Global’s patented verification technology. A unique digital fingerprint of the document is stored on the blockchain and can’t be edited or tampered with. VeriDoc Sign allows companies to leverage blockchain
technology to secure eSignatures. The solution is designed to improve efficiency by eliminating long wait
times to print, sign, scan and send documents. The software requires no coding,
existing software or special hardware.…
N/A
Pricing
OneSpan Sign
VeriDoc Sign
Editions & Modules
Free Trial
$0
Free for 30 Days
Professionnal
$20
Per User per Month
Enterprise
Call for Pricing
Enterprise
Call for pricing
Contract
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OneSpan Sign
VeriDoc Sign
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OneSpan Sign
VeriDoc Sign
Considered Both Products
OneSpan Sign
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose OneSpan Sign
Both products had similar functions, but I found that OneSpan Sign just had the edge when it came to use ability and user experience. It is very clear how to use the system and it integrates very well into our business. Are use it on a regular basis, and even though I’ve tried …
we realized some insurance companies are using OneSpan and also our admin office uses the same program. Therefore, it is more friendly in terms of everyone knowing software.
My experience with OneSpan in the customer service has been very positive. However, since my experience with OneSpan is much more recent, most of my technical experience with OneSpan includes technical areas that were not available in other products at the time I was working …
All other evaluated tools allowed for changes within the document after the first signature. Within OneSpan this action kicked off a completely new signing process. This along with the security compliance was our main factor for approval.
We are being introduced to similar products; I'm loyal, but any improvement with the unlocking of documents, and yearly subscription cost would make me more loyal!
DocuSign was probably one of the alternatives but to be honest we just did not evaluate alternatives at all. We were simply happy to integrate easily with an approved (by our financial institution) eSign product. We just moved from the POC to a "That's a go" decision given the …
I was told that the other services may have a better API but for our needs, the cheaper the better and eSign Live's prices could not be beat. I believe that DocuSign's similar product was roughly four times as much as what we are currently spending on eSign Live.
Our primary market is the enterprise. We reviewed other tools at the outset but these are small to medium scale tools trying to move into the enterprise, mostly with public cloud only offerings. We needed a platform with a proven record in the enterprise with options like …
We've used a few other programs for sponsorships, and looked into using them for scholarships but the cost was in the thousands to create an additional form. eSignLive was much more cost-effective for our department as our organization was already using it for other forms (I …
It all comes down to workflow and UX. e-SignLive is the superior choice when it comes to these factors. The product lays out the signing process in an easy-to-follow format that is easy to understand both from the client side and the customer side. As a SaaS user, security was …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose OneSpan Sign
We were also considering Docusign but with the similarity of product and functional offering, it boiled down to price and possibly a better support system.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose OneSpan Sign
e-SignLive provided us with more cost control options around implementing and using the service than competitors. e-SignLive seems to offer stronger legal and audit attention to details around electronic signature processing.
Cost factor stood out as our initial requirement was very basic while we evaluate 3 products. Also the signature creating process seemed to be easy and smooth compared to other products. However I was not heavily involved in the evaluation process.
One thing that VeriDoc offers that Docusign does not is the ability to verify your documents, this added level of security is something that I really like it. I am hoping for a mobile version of VeriDoc soon; However. I also love being able to see my documents in real time so …
VeriDoc Sign help us manage multiple users and reviewers to any single contract document. We do not have to worry about authenticity and traceability of the document. These features are not available in docusign or Adobe Acrobat. Unlike other softwares VeriDoc Sign is on …
Adobe turned out to be better, since instructions, training and support are more plentiful and easier to find. VeriDoc Sign was not as intuitive to learn and was missing some key features, which made Adobe comparatively more efficient and a better value despite the higher price …
I have used DocuSign for years and years. The one thing that Veridoc makes better is the UI system. DocuSign is very confusing and can be a bit complicated when you have many many users that need to sign and return packet. VeriDoc Sign simplified the process so i can just send …
We use DocuSign and VeriDoc Sign together. This allows us to verify the documents are true and accurate before and after they are signed via DocuSign. Previously, we had used DocuSign by itself.
VeriDoc Sign offers a minimal set of features that meet my needs and I am satisfied with that, as Docusign offers more features that I never use, and I am satisfied with the VeriDoc Sign, while Docusign features like scheduling are usually not needed by me and it seems more …
It is well suited for financial professional field. At the moment, i cannot think of area that will be less appropriate. It all comes down to if the admin office or head office can accept OneSpan as authorized software. Often enough, program can be very good but not recognized by head office due to its compliance issue. For example, in the Canadian regulatory rules for investments, sometimes it requires companies to process/store documents in the same country. If there is a cross border issue, it will be a big compliance issue.
VeriDoc Sign is a tool with great potential. It has a lot of room for improvement as a product. This type of tool is for essential for any organization and therefore the product can do much better in terms of adding customer requirements. Right now, blockchain contract process has been such a relief for us and we have used this for all our contracts. Users are easily adopted as you can even sign your document by typing or drawing on the document. However, we need to add expiry dates for some contracts and there is no such option to do. Also you will need to send reminders manually if the parties have not signed or approved the documents submitted.
I don't see any reasons to change as their solution covers all my need for now. I could make even more integrations but that might be something that I will do down the road. I'm used to working with the interface and my data is all there as well.
The product is so well designed and built that we rarely need to reach out to customer service. But we have reached out to them in case of downtime, and we have always gotten a satisfactory response. We never had to follow up, as customer service executives were very responsible.
My experience with OneSpan in the customer service has been very positive. However, since my experience with OneSpan is much more recent, most of my technical experience with OneSpan includes technical areas that were not available in other products at the time I was working with other products.
VeriDoc Sign offers a minimal set of features that meet my needs and I am satisfied with that, as DocuSign offers more features that I never use, and I am satisfied with the VeriDoc Sign, while DocuSign features like scheduling are usually not needed by me and it seems more advanced for me.