TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Open Source Puppet vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Open Source Puppet

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AOpen source Puppet provides tools to automate the configuration and management of IT infrastructure. It is supported by a community of users and contributors. Users can get involved by fixing bugs, influencing new feature direction, publishing modules, and engage with the community to share knowledge and expertise.N/A

    Ansible

    Score9.2 out of 10
    N/AThe Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform (acquired by Red Hat in 2015) is a foundation for building and operating automation across an organization. The platform includes tools needed to implement enterprise-wide automation, and can automate resource provisioning, and IT environments and configuration of systems and devices. It can be used in a CI/CD process to provision the target environment and to then deploy the application on it.

    $5,000

    per year

    Pricing
    Open Source PuppetAnsible
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Basic Tower
    5,000
    per year
    Enterprise Tower
    10,000
    per year
    Premium Tower
    14,000
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Open Source PuppetAnsible
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Open Source PuppetAnsible
    Considered Both Products
    Perforce Software
    No answer on this topic
    Red Hat
    Chose Ansible
    I've evaluated Puppet and Chef and they're not as good as Ansible.
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Easier to use and adapt
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Puppet is more constant state management for us than Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is a more one off configuration then we transfer over to a pupper configuration for steady state.
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    I used puppet prior to moving to open source Ansible and eventually to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. I appreciate the agentless approach of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and feel that its deterministic approach to applying code is superior to puppet
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    There's 0 comparison. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform leaves them in the dust. It is easier to configure and wipe playbooks for, and has way more community support and documentation making it a no brainer.
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    It's agentless. Not needing to deploy and maintain an agent on a system I want to maintain is invaluable.
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Ease of use, once you understand how to configure the tool, everything is a piece of cake. It runs pretty fast also, can use GITLab to manage our playbooks. Security options is great, can setup granular security depending on each team using Red Hat Ansible Automation …
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform requires little to no configuration on the nodes to manage the systems. However, this means that the inventory source of Truth must come from somewhere else. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is able to manage things beyond typical nodes …
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Much easier to use and understand.
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is much easier to setup than Puppet, because it is agentless.
    The Ansible community seems to be more active than Puppet's in the recent years.
    Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform does not require learning a programming language where Puppet …
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    As I said earlier, Red Hat Ansible remains a top choice because it is a perfect combination of multiple capabilities. Terraform is good in IAC but not in config automation. Puppet is well-suited for developers, but not for system administrators and infrastructure integrators. …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Open Source PuppetAnsible
    Configuration Management
    Comparison of Configuration Management features of Open Source Puppet and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
    Feature
    Open Source Puppet
    -
    Ratings
    Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
    8.6
    44 Ratings
    Infrastructure Automation00 Ratings9.244 Ratings
    Automated Provisioning00 Ratings8.841 Ratings
    Parallel Execution00 Ratings8.840 Ratings
    Node Management00 Ratings8.432 Ratings
    Reporting & Logging00 Ratings7.841 Ratings
    Version Control00 Ratings8.738 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Open Source PuppetAnsible
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.5
    (108 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (5 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.6
    (5 ratings)