openSUSE Open Build Service (OBS) vs. Travis CI

openSUSE Open Build Service (OBS)

openSUSE Open Build Service (OBS)

0 Reviews and Ratings

Travis CI

Travis CI

26 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
openSUSE Open Build Service (OBS)	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	German company SUSE supports the open source project openSUSE. Open Build Service (OBS) is the openSUSE generic system to build and distribute binary packages from sources in an automatic, consistent and reproducible way.	N/A
Travis CI	Score 7.3 out of 10	N/A	Travis CI is an open source continuous integration platform, that enables users to run and test simultaneously on different environments, and automatically catch code failures and bugs.	$69 per month

Pricing

openSUSE Open Build Service (OBS)

Travis CI

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

1 Concurrent Job Plan: $69
per month
Bootstrap: $69
per month 1 concurrent job
2 Concurrent Jobs Plan: $129
per month
Startup: $129
per month 2 concurrent jobs
5 Concurrent Jobs Plan: $249
per month
Small Business: $249
per month 5 concurrent jobs
Premium: $489
per month 10 concurrent jobs
Platinum: $794+
per month starting at 15 concurrent jobs
Free Plan: Free

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
openSUSE Open Build Service (OBS)	Travis CI
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

Discount available for annual pricing.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	openSUSE Open Build Service (OBS)	Travis CI
Considered Both Products	openSUSE Open Build Service (OBS) No answer on this topic	Travis CI Oscar Morrison Software Engineer Chose Travis CI Similar features. [Travis CI has a] Simpler interface and setup. Incentivized Helpful? Ryan Brewster Principal Software Engineer Chose Travis CI Jenkins is probably the leading choice for automation and has loads of features and a large community behind it, but it can be overkill for many projects. It also has more of a web 1.0 look and interface. CircleCI is another similar big competitor, but cannot compete with Travis … Incentivized Helpful? Eduardo Sampaio CTO Chose Travis CI There are a few other options out there, CircleCI, Codeship and Wrecker would be a few good ones I can also recommend, each one has its particularity but I believe Travis has the best interface and flexibility of all of them. I'd recommend trying them all and seeing which one … Incentivized Helpful? Mathias Fonseca CTO Chose Travis CI Jenkins is much more complicated to configure and start using. Although, one you have done that, it's extremely powerful and full of features. Maybe many more than Travis CI. As per TeamCity, I would never go back to using it. It's also complicated to configure but it is not … Incentivized Helpful? Yasmany Cubela Medina Development Team Lead Chose Travis CI TravisCI is the first choice for open source projects. Incentivized Helpful? Kevin Patrick Westropp Software Engineer Chose Travis CI Much easier to navigate web interface. Setup and configuration is much easier and straightforward via the yml config file. Incentivized Helpful? Jonathan Yu, P.Eng. Software Engineer - OpenShift Chose Travis CI There are a number of alternatives to Travis CI, but Travis remains the most popular, since it was one of the first to show up. It has a lot of examples, support for building dozens of languages, and good documentation. Significant portions of the system are open source, so you … Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	openSUSE Open Build Service (OBS)	Travis CI
Small Businesses	GitLab Score 8.7 out of 10	GitLab Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	GitLab Score 8.7 out of 10	GitLab Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises	GitLab Score 8.7 out of 10	GitLab Score 8.7 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	openSUSE Open Build Service (OBS)	Travis CI
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	6.0 (0 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	5.0 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	4.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	openSUSE Open Build Service (OBS)	Travis CI
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	TravisCI is suited for workflows involving typical software development but unfortunately I think the software needs more improvement to be up to date with current development systems and TravisCI hasn't been improving much in that space in terms of integrations. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	It's simple and easy to get started (it can detect the language being used based on build configuration files like a Maven pom.xml). It's free (as in beer) for open source projects. It has a responsive staff (you can file issues on GitHub to ask for new languages or packages to be supported, and the turnaround time isn't too bad for the free offering). The user interface is beautiful and easy-to-use, including features like live-tailing in-progress builds. It supports specifying private environment variables and encrypted credentials, so that you can safely automate deployments (for example, pushing built docker images to DockerHub). Incentivized Jonathan Yu Software Engineer - OpenShift Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	Travis CI is a fairly mature platform now, and most, if not all of the common complaints have been improved. This includes documentation and logs with color support. Incentivized Ryan Brewster Principal Software Engineer Read full review
Usability	No answers on this topic	TravisCI hasn't had much changes made to its software and has thus fallen behind compared to many other CI/CD applications out there. I can only give it a 5 because it does what it is supposed to do but lacks product innovation. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	No answers on this topic	After the private equity firm had bought this company the innovation and support has really gone downhill a lot. I am not a fan that they have gutted the software trying to make money from it and put innovation and product development second. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	Jenkins is probably the leading choice for automation and has loads of features and a large community behind it, but it can be overkill for many projects. It also has more of a web 1.0 look and interface. CircleCI is another similar big competitor, but cannot compete with Travis CI's free account [in my opinion]. Incentivized Ryan Brewster Principal Software Engineer Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	It saves you in infrastructure and setup costs, since running a server and installing and maintaining Jenkins can be a hassle. Incentivized Eduardo Sampaio CTO Read full review
ScreenShots