OpenText ALM Octane vs. TestRail

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText ALM Octane
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
OpenText™ ALM Octane, formerly from Micro Focus, includes integrated planning, continuous integration, test management, and release management. With these capabilities, it helps Agile teams and DevOps toolchains to deliver high-quality software with insight, traceability, analytics-focused end-to-end visibility, and continuous quality.N/A
TestRail
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
TestRail by Gurock, an IDERA company, is presented as a complete web-based test case management solution to manage, track, and organize your software testing efforts.
$35
per month billed annually per user
Pricing
OpenText ALM OctaneTestRail
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Professional Cloud
$35
per month billed annually per user
Professional Cloud
$38
per month per user
Enterprise Cloud
$71
per month billed annually per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText ALM OctaneTestRail
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText ALM OctaneTestRail
Features
OpenText ALM OctaneTestRail
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText ALM Octane
-
Ratings
TestRail
7.5
Ratings
7% below category average
Centralized test management00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Map tests to user stories00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Test execution reporting00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Defect management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
User Ratings
OpenText ALM OctaneTestRail
Likelihood to Recommend
7.4
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText ALM OctaneTestRail
Likelihood to Recommend
For big applications and projects where different teams work in a different location, it is very helpful for them to keep all the processes in one place and makes it easy to keep track of all team member's processes.
Read full review
Well suited - where you have a set of cases defined say for regression and then you can mark them as Pass/Fail/Skipped, etc. If you wish to present the impact of certain set of new features, bug fixes,etc, you can use this tool Not well suited- where the user is naive and don’t have much understanding of test reporting tools as this tool is slightly difficult to learn at a glance
Read full review
Pros
  • Bug-logging and keeping track of the bug status.
  • Integration with DevOps to do continuous testing.
  • Keeping coordination between development and testing teams.
Read full review
  • Beautiful and productive UI.
  • Nice filtering system allowing me to find what I need quickly.
Read full review
Cons
  • The integration to Synchronizer is very difficult to implement.
  • The integration to Jira was very hard to get working.
Read full review
  • UI has a lot scope of improvement
  • Uploading of test screenshots and managing them can be more effective
  • User experience can be improved
  • Tracking of tests can be more simplified
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
As I am a tester, for me I found this tool to be new in terms of everything like the management of tests, plans, releases, reporting,etc. It is overall a good tool for test reporting and can be used for reference in the future. I liked several features of on the go placement of screenshots. Also I feel like the UI , the font, the color combination can be improved
Read full review
Support Rating
Customer support is very good takes minimal time to resolve the issue and always takes feedback seriously to improve the application.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Micro Focus ALM Octane use at DaVita goes back beyond my starting with them three years ago. They have used it as part of DevOps as well as for performance measurement of software releases in combo with HP Performance Center (a great combination). Jira is well suited to managing bug reports and development processes with Agile and Scrum, but ALM Octane goes above and beyond that.
Read full review
TestRail definitely saves times. I work in a company that consists of several development teams, all of which have different processes. Some of the teams leverage test cases, some do not. I've noticed that the turn around time it takes for me to pick up a ticket, QA it, and then pass/fail/send feedback is much faster when there is a test case created as I'm not reading through ticket description/comments to figure out what needs to be QA'd.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Our Performance Measurement team uses ALM all the time for test performance measurement in conjunction with HP Performance Center. We could not have such a robust performance capability without ALM.
  • Not being on the management side of it (I am a technical resource for support), I do not have solid information on ROI.
Read full review
  • We are able to easily pull reports any time management would like to see them
  • Jira integration makes it easy to attach to stories/defects and save time
  • A quick overview at the system's health as a whole is easy to see from TestRail
Read full review
ScreenShots