OpenText ALM/Quality Center vs. Ranorex Studio
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 OpenText ALM/Quality Center | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | OpenText™ ALM/Quality Center, formerly from Micro Focus, serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps users to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes. | N/A |
 Ranorex Studio | Score7.8 out of 10 | N/A | Over 14,000+ users worldwide automate tests with Ranorex Studio, which promises to enable rapid delivery of high-quality desktop, mobile, and web applications. The vendor says that with over 10 years in test automation, Ranorex Studio supports automating functional UI tests for even the most challenging technologies, from legacy applications to the latest web and mobile platforms. Ranorex Studio is an all-in-one tool that empowers everyone on the team. Key benefits and… | $890 per additional endpoint |
| OpenText ALM/Quality Center | Ranorex Studio | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | All licenses are perpetual and include 12 months of maintenance and email support. A runtime floating license requires at least one premium license for test creation. Please contact our sales team for information about possible volume discounts and options for enterprise support. Consulting, integration and training services are available from our partners worldwide. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| OpenText ALM/Quality Center | Ranorex Studio | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| OpenText ALM/Quality Center | Ranorex Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.1 | 1.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 | - |
| Usability | 3.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 7.4 | 6.0 |
| Ease of integration | 1.0 | - |