OpenText LoadRunner Professional

OpenText LoadRunner Professional

68 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
LoadRunner Professional	Score8.9 out of 10	N/A	A solution simplifies performance load testing for colocated teams. With project-based capabilities, so teams can quickly identify abnormal application behavior.	N/A

Pricing

LoadRunner Professional

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
LoadRunner Professional
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

No setup fee

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	LoadRunner Professional
Considered Both Products	OpenText Chris Trimper Enterprise QA Lead Automation Analyst in Quality Assurance at Independent Health (Insurance, 1001-5000 employees) Chose LoadRunner Professional Micro Focus LoadRunner fit well into our portfolio of tools with its long track record, ability to test near any application technology we adopt and allow for a single / cohesive toolset to drive our performance testing needs. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose LoadRunner Professional While soasta is currently being used for cloud related applications, LR is specifically used to address the load testing on on-premise servers in our case. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose LoadRunner Professional Loadrunner stacks up very well against these tools. All software have certain very strong features and that is what differentiates LoadRunner from all of these. It has accurate results and data. Reports are also very well formatted. Different data can be integrated and other … Incentivized Helpful? Mayank Thirani Research Assistant in Engineering at University of San Francisco (Higher Education, 1001-5000 employees) Chose LoadRunner Professional The biggest point of using HP LoadRunner is the response time numbers captured after executing the tests were more accurate when we generated the same by using tools like JMeter or NeoLoad though it involves a certain licensing cost but what [we] needed was trust and accuracy … Incentivized Helpful? Anil Kumar Moka Senior QA Lead and Automation Consultant in Quality Assurance at Wipro Technologies (Information Technology and Services, 10,001+ employees) Chose LoadRunner Professional HP performance center stacks up very well for front end applications. Need more improvements for API performance testing. Incentivized Helpful? Pradeepan Anthony Associate QA Manager/Performance Testing Practice in Quality Assurance at Virtusa (Computer Software, 10,001+ employees) Chose LoadRunner Professional Most of the above tools are pretty popular in the industry. These are tools that are way cheaper compared to the industry giant LoadRunner. Yet these tools have their own limitations and drawbacks. In BlazeMeter the user load cannot be modified during the test run. JMeter and Bl… Incentivized Helpful? Peter Skintges QC Test Manager in Quality Assurance at BLUE Software (Computer Software, 51-200 employees) Chose LoadRunner Professional It was faster to script in HP LoadRunner than in JMeter. The main issue is the expense involved in the cost of the virtual users in HP LoadRunner. In time, it may be more cost effective to switch to JMeter when the number of virtual users increases. Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic

Features

LoadRunner Professional

Comparison of Load Testing features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional
Feature	OpenText LoadRunner Professional 8.4 6 Ratings
End to end performance management	9.06 Ratings
Integrated performance data	10.06 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility	9.06 Ratings
Real time monitoring	6.15 Ratings
Automated anomaly detection	8.05 Ratings

User Ratings
	LoadRunner Professional
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (7 ratings)
Support Rating	3.0 (1 ratings)